The Asset-Protection Machine Behind the “Stolen LEGO” Story

In November 2023, Bryan Mansell walked into the Bricks & Minifigs store in Keizer, Oregon, and consigned his elderly father’s Star Wars LEGO collection to the franchise to sell. He never saw most of it again. A year later the franchisor terminated that store, repossessed it, ran it as a corporate location, and then handed it to two new “independent” owners. One was the franchisor’s own franchise-sales recruiter. The other was the contractor it had sent to inventory the store when it seized it.

When a YouTuber who covers LEGO, “Reckless Ben,” began documenting the missing collection, the response was not a refund. It was a thirteen-count racketeering lawsuit, a restraining order dictating what he could publish, takedown demands to Patreon and GoFundMe, and, after a traffic stop, a search warrant, an arrest, and body-camera footage the police released only after blacking out roughly three hours of video and muting about ninety-four minutes of audio.

None of that is the real story. It is the surface of one. Underneath is Legally Mine, an asset-protection firm built by Daniel J. McNeff and run with his sons Ammon and Matthew, whose entire business was teaching people to make themselves hard to sue and hard to collect from. An Ohio court has ruled that business is the unlawful practice of law. The family then appears to have run the same creditor-frustration playbook on its own companies: a litigated firm renamed to an empty husk, the brand handed to a man the FTC won a 1999 consumer-redress judgment against over the collapsed iMall internet venture, and a new holding company stood up to hold the trademarks of the insolvent toy franchise in the middle of the litigation, even as the marks themselves still sit registered to the old entity. The two halves are the same instinct: never let the facts be tested. Make the assets hard to reach, and turn every institution within reach, the civil courts, a gag order, the police, on anyone who asks where they went. People who win by hiding the connections lose when the connections are laid out in one place. That is what this is.

How to read thisGrades, and the rules we held to

Every factual claim carries a grade, so you always know how solid the ground is:

ADJUDICATED court-decided · ADMITTED party-admitted · CONFIRMED primary document · CORROBORATED multiple sources · ASSERTED alleged, not decided · INFERENCE reasoned read · UNRESOLVED open · METADATA index/metadata only · REFUTED disproven

The discipline. Criminal charges against Benjamin Schneider are unadjudicated, presumption of innocence. Sworn-but-undecided allegations are labeled ASSERTED. A shared name is never treated as a shared identity without a document (see Same-name discipline). Third-party private data, home addresses, dates of birth, SSN/EIN, minors, non-party family, is withheld. source ↗ links open live public records; 📄 links point to documents we hold, opening their hosted copy where supplied. Reporting on matters of public concern, not a finding of any person’s guilt.

By the numbersThe case in six figures

≈49.6%

of Bricks & Minifigs that Legally Mine pledged to the franchise’s sellers, 450,000 of 906,500 shares

$1.39M

PPP loan to Legally Mine; the founder’s own sons swore he misappropriated it

body-camera clips withheld entirely from the official police release

≈94 min

of body-camera audio muted in the official release but intact in the leak

$5,000

penalty in the Ohio order finding Legally Mine practiced law unlawfully

items seized on the “stolen LEGO” search warrant, the return reads “no items seized”

The investigationThe full story

Chapter One

The collection that vanished

A son consigned his father’s life-long Star Wars LEGO collection to a friendly neighborhood brick shop in Oregon, on paper that said it stayed his until sold, and then the shop, and the collection, were gone.

The collection had taken a lifetime to build. Retired Star Wars LEGO sets, still in their boxes; loose minifigures, the little plastic people that LEGO collectors prize above almost everything; the kind of hoard that a certain sort of person assembles patiently over decades and a certain sort of son inherits with a lump in his throat. By the autumn of 2023 it belonged, in effect, to Bryan Mansell, who had decided to do the sensible thing with his elderly father’s trove and sell it through people who knew what it was worth.

So on November 22, 2023, Mansell walked into a Bricks & Minifigs store serving the Keizer and Salem area of Oregon and signed a consignment agreement. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A Consignment is an old and simple arrangement: you hand a merchant your goods, the merchant sells them from the shop floor, and when something sells you split the proceeds. The crucial point, the entire point, is that until the sale happens, the goods are still yours. Mansell’s contract said exactly that. Section IV provided, in plain words, that “Consigned merchandise shall remain the property of Mansell until sold.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A The agreement was governed by Oregon law. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A In the language of the Uniform Commercial Code that every state including Oregon and Utah has adopted, a consignor in Mansell’s position keeps title and holds a security interest in his own inventory; the store is merely a merchant known to sell the goods of others. Utah Code Ann. sec. 70A-9a-102(a)(20)✓ His Star Wars sets were sitting on someone else’s shelves, but they were still his.

The shop was a franchise. Bricks & Minifigs is a chain of LEGO-resale stores, buy, sell, trade used and new brick, operating across the country under a single brand. The brand and its franchise system belong to a Utah company called BAM Franchising, Inc., which had registered the “Bricks & Minifigs” trademark and built out the network store by store. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks & Minifigs 2023 FDD By the time Mansell signed his paperwork, the company was issuing franchise disclosure documents describing the system to would-be store owners, and assembling a portfolio of marks around the brand. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 The federal trademark office would, in late 2025, register BAM Franchising’s standard-character “BAM” mark to the company. USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901 On paper it was a tidy little empire of plastic.

The Keizer-Salem location, like the others, was independently owned. The franchisee on the ground, the people Mansell was actually dealing with, were the local operators of the Salem store, names that recur through the later court record: Bryan, sometimes rendered Benjamin, Gorman, and Chrystal Law. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint They ran the shop. BAM Franchising, up in Utah, ran the brand. To a customer handing over a box of vintage minifigures, the distinction would have seemed academic. It would not stay academic for long.

For a while, presumably, nothing happened that a consignor would notice, sets moving, the slow ordinary commerce of a hobby store. Bricks & Minifigs marketed itself, in the warm way these shops do, as the place for LEGO people; somewhere in the sales patter, according to the later filings, came the suggestion that the store was an authorized LEGO reseller, part of the official family. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint That representation, the franchisees’ own side would eventually argue, was false. LEGO itself said so in writing. In a letter the litigation dates to February 28, 2025, the LEGO Group stated flatly that “Bricks & Minifigs isn’t affiliated with the LEGO Group in any ways.” Exhibit A Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-A-LEGO-Email The franchise’s own disclosure document, read carefully, conceded as much, it carried a disclaimer that LEGO “does not sponsor, authorize or endorse” the business. Exhibit B Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-B-Franchise-Agreement The friendly neighborhood LEGO store was not, in any formal sense, a LEGO store at all.

That is the kind of detail that only becomes load-bearing in hindsight, once something has gone wrong. And by late 2024, something had gone very wrong. The store was gone. Where a year earlier there had been a going concern with Mansell’s father’s collection on its shelves, there was now an absence, the Salem-Keizer franchise shuttered, and most of the consigned collection gone with it.

What had happened, in the broadest strokes that the documents support, was a collapse in the relationship between the franchisor and its franchisee. The franchise agreement that bound the Salem store to BAM had two different off-ramps for a store in trouble: one section allowing automatic termination with no chance to cure, another requiring ten days’ notice and an opportunity to fix a payment default before the franchisor could pull the plug. Exhibit B Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-B-Franchise-Agreement BAM, the franchisees would later allege, terminated under the no-cure clause for what were really payment defaults that belonged in the cure track, and did so, they claimed, after itself failing to meet conditions it owed, so that it had effectively manufactured the very defaults it then invoked. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint Those are allegations in a complaint the franchisees filed against BAM in the Utah Business and Chancery Court; no court has ruled on them. Gorman/Mansell Complaint v. BAM Franchising⏳ BAM has its own answer to all of it, and the case is unresolved.

But strip away the contractual quarrel between two businesses and a smaller, sharper fact remains, the one that should have been untouchable. Mansell’s collection was never BAM’s to take. It was not the store’s either. Under the contract he had signed, and under the commonest principle of consignment law, title to the unsold sets had stayed with him the whole time. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A Conversion, the legal name for exercising control over someone else’s property in defiance of their rights, does not even require an intent to keep the goods forever; it requires only the wrongful dominion. Alta Industries Ltd. v. Hurst✓ When the store was seized and resold, the franchisees would allege, Mansell’s Star Wars collection was swept up and sold along with everything else, by parties who had no ownership interest in it and were on notice that it was disputed. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint He had done everything right. He had the paper. And the paper said the collection was his.

How much was it worth? That question would turn out to be a battlefield of its own. The collection was a substantial one, the sort valued, in the loose currency of a hobby-store promotion, in six figures. A figure of $200,000 would later attach itself to the affair, but the franchise litigation traces that number to a 2023 in-store promotional valuation rather than any appraisal of what was actually taken, and even the genuinely unexplained gap in the accounting is alleged to be far smaller, on the order of ten to twenty thousand dollars. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint What the precise number was, and who exactly was answerable for it, the franchisor in Utah, or the local operators of the Salem store, are matters still in dispute. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint

Set the dollar fight aside, though, and you are left with the human fact that opens this story and animates everything that follows. A man consigned his father’s life’s work to a store that promised to keep it safe and keep it his. He signed an agreement that said so. And when he went looking, the store had vanished and the collection had vanished with it.

That disappearance is the thread. Pull on it, and it runs a very long way, out of a strip-mall LEGO shop in Oregon, into franchise courts and trademark tribunals, into a tangle of Utah and Alaska shell companies and an asset-protection business with a history all its own, and eventually into a documentarian’s camera, a stalking warrant, and a judge’s order to take it all down. But it begins here, with a box of plastic that was supposed to stay where it was put, and didn’t.

The most-repeated number did not survive scrutiny. The viral figure was $200,000; the franchise filings trace it to a 2023 in-store promotion rather than any appraisal, and put the real value nearer $107,000. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint On camera, BAM’s own chief operating officer produced a roughly $10,000 night-of inventory of the seized Star Wars sets and allowed that corporate was “very likely” still holding them; the moving truck BAM denied sending turned out to have existed, as the investigator Coffeezilla reconstructed from the primary footage. The genuinely unexplained gap, on the franchisees’ own accounting, is closer to ten or twenty thousand dollars, and part of it points back at the store’s local operators, not the franchisor. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint

Chapter Two

The takeover

How a LEGO franchisor allegedly engineered the defaults it needed, seized a store and a stranger’s Star Wars collection overnight, and months later sold the wreckage to its own two men.

Every franchise deal has two or three small hinges on which the whole thing swings. In the sale of the Bricks & Minifigs store in Salem, Oregon, there were two. The bank account had to change hands. The lease had to be assigned. Do those two things and the buyer becomes the store: rent comes out of her account, the landlord’s notices go to her mailbox, the auto-payments to the franchisor run on their own. Leave them undone and the buyer is running someone else’s store on someone else’s paperwork, and that someone is the franchisor.

According to the franchisees’ sworn complaint, those two hinges were never set. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint The store’s operating company, BAMF Salem 1, LLC, bought the Oregon location in early 2023 under a written Franchise Agreement and a Business and Asset Purchase Agreement with BAM Franchising, Inc., the Delaware corporation that owns the national Bricks & Minifigs system. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint The purchase agreement, by BAM’s own account, required the buyers “to obtain landlord consent to a lease assignment” and “to coordinate account transfers.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint Those were the conditions precedent. The franchisees say they were BAM’s to complete and BAM never did.

Read BAM’s own verified complaint and the gap is right there, stated as fact by the company that benefited from it: “the lease and various accounts were never properly transferred.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint BAM frames that sentence as the franchisee’s failure. The franchisees’ complaint frames it as the trap. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint Because the lease was never assigned, BAM remained the tenant of record; the landlord’s bills and notices kept flowing to BAM, not to the operator who was actually behind the counter selling LEGO. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint Because the bank account never transferred, the automatic payments the franchise ran on could not run from the right account. The franchisees allege the result was not an accident but a mechanism: the very “payment defaults” and “unpaid lease” that BAM would later invoke as grounds to terminate were, on their account, manufactured by BAM’s own failure to throw the two switches. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint

Whether that is a fair reading is for a court; none has ruled. But the franchise contract itself shows why the distinction matters so much. The Bricks & Minifigs Franchise Agreement has two different doors marked “termination.” FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 Section 14.A, “Immediate Termination,” lets the franchisor declare the agreement terminated “automatically, without notice, at our discretion”, no warning, no chance to fix anything. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 Section 14.B, “Notice of Termination,” is the slower, fairer door: for a franchisee who fails “to make payment of any amounts due,” the company must send written notice and give the franchisee ten days to cure before the termination bites. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026

Here is the catch the franchisees point to. A money default and a lease problem appear on both lists. Section 14.A treats “Failure to Make Payments” when due, and “Breach of Lease; Loss of Right of Possession,” as grounds for no-cure, no-notice termination. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 Section 14.B covers the same failure to pay and the same loss of the premises, but with the ten-day cure attached. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 A franchisor confronting an unpaid balance can walk through either door. According to the franchisees’ complaint, BAM chose the no-cure door, 14.A, for defaults that its own non-performance had produced, skipping the ten-day cure that 14.B would have required for exactly the same dollars. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint Exhibit B Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-B-Franchise-Agreement

The contract gave BAM one more thing it needed. The franchise agreement reserves to the company the right to “assume the lease upon your termination,” and a recordable option to step into the premises if the deal ends “for whatsoever reason.” FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 Stay the tenant of record, terminate under the clause with no cure, and the franchisor can take the keys, the four walls, and everything inside them, without ever handing the operator the chance to make the payments right.

The night the store changed hands

BAM dates its move to November 14, 2024. On its own telling, it issued a written “Notice of Immediate Termination” to the Salem operating company, “exercised its priority rights to the collateral,” and “repossessed the Salem LLC store on or after 11/14/24 and assumed the lease,” taking “any and all fixtures, inventory and other assets.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint BAM puts the unpaid balance at “an estimated $175,000,” and says it credited the seized store against that debt at “an estimated $38,000 paltry value.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint The operator’s complaint describes the seizure differently, an after-hours clearing-out of well over $100,000 in store assets, taken without the notice-and-cure the operator says it was owed. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint

One detail survives in both accounts and it is worth pausing on. BAM’s complaint admits that, as its people took the store, the departing owner “removed certain receipts, a high value Boba Fett minifig and possibly money in the safe, over Brandon’s objection.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint “Brandon” is Brandon Best, and who Brandon Best was on that night is the hinge of everything that follows. By BAM’s own sworn words, he was “engaged as a contracted inventory inspector for BAM” and “was requested to inspect and inventory the Salem LLC store at the time of repossession.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint He was the franchisor’s man, sent to count what the franchisor was taking.

Then the inventory man became the buyer. BAM’s complaint lays out the sequence without apparent embarrassment: “After Brandon secured the location incident to the termination and completed the inventory, Josh expressed to BAM his interest in acquiring a franchise for the store location.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint “Josh” is Josh Johnson, described in the same filing as another insider in BAM’s orbit. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint Best and Johnson, the complaint continues, “agreed to jointly do so and formed Baker Salem,” believing they could “purchase the assets free and clear, assume the lease from BAM and infuse new inventory.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint In the first quarter of 2025 BAM sold the repossessed store and its contents to that new entity, owned by its own inspector and its own recruit, under a January 9, 2025 franchise agreement and a March 27, 2025 purchase agreement. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint The franchisees’ account compresses the turnaround harder still: the store seized one night, the franchisor’s two insiders installed as the new owners within roughly a day. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint

The neatness of it is the allegation. A store is declared in default under a no-cure clause; the franchisor takes it, values it at a fraction of the debt, and resells it to two men who already worked for the franchisor, one of whom had personally inventoried the assets he would shortly own. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint Best and Johnson are now co-plaintiffs alongside BAM in the lawsuit that grew out of all this, represented by the same Salt Lake firm. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint None of it has been tested at trial. BAM insists the resale was an “arm’s-length and legitimate corporate sale” to “bona fide third-party purchasers” who “acquired the business from BAM” with no knowledge of any competing claim. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint The franchisees say the buyers were never strangers at all. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint

The collection that wasn’t theirs to take

There was a problem with the inventory BAM hauled away, and its name was Bryan Mansell. More than a year before the seizure, on November 22, 2023, Mansell had signed a consignment agreement placing “a large collection of retired Star Wars Lego sets and minifigures” with the Salem store to sell on his behalf. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A The terms were ordinary and explicit. The store would take 35 percent of each sale and send Mansell 65 percent. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A And the title never moved: “Consigned merchandise shall remain the property of Mansell until sold,” the contract reads, with any unsold sets to “be returned to Mansell within 10 days of termination.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A The store was a shelf, not an owner. The collection belonged to a man who had never been party to anyone’s franchise deal.

When BAM cleared the store, the franchisees’ account holds, it swept Mansell’s consigned LEGO into the pile of seized “assets” it credited against the operator’s debt, taking goods that the consignment contract says it had no right to take. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A BAM’s answer to that is that it had no idea the collection existed: it took the store, it says, “as a bona fide purchaser, without notice of any third party claims or liens of any kind,” including the “undisclosed and alleged” consignment with Mansell. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint The company also disputes how much was even there, contending its inspector found “less than $5,000 worth of Star Wars LEGO product” onsite. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint

Mansell did not go quietly, and BAM’s complaint records what happened when he came looking. Within a day or two of the seizure he telephoned the store, then arrived in person holding his consignment paperwork and demanding the return of his collection or payment of $80,000. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint He was told the new occupants were not parties to his contract and turned away; he came back that evening with the police. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint By BAM’s own account the responding officer “concluded this was a private civil matter” and left without taking anyone’s side. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint A man’s Star Wars collection had been folded into a franchise repossession, and the system’s first answer to him was that it was somebody else’s problem.

What BAM did next

For most of a year the dispute lived in demand letters and small-claims paper. The Salem operating company sent BAM a legal demand on December 24, 2024, claiming it had been damaged by the termination; BAM denied it on January 10, 2025. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint In Oregon, the fight also reached small-claims court, in complaints against L2 Bricks, LLC (an earlier Salem franchise entity that preceded the Gorman ownership, not the store’s post-repossession operator) and, separately, against Josh Johnson personally. Complaint Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-small-claim-com Complaint Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-small-claim-com Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-claim-cc-1726577 BAM would eventually recast that scatter of filings as a sinister “campaign”, “splitting claims in multiple ineffective small claims actions”, in the sweeping Utah racketeering suit it brought in 2026 against the operators, against Mansell, and against a YouTuber named Benjamin Schneider whose video about the store drew more than 1.3 million views. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction Those racketeering allegations, and the criminal charges that trail behind them, are unproven and contested; they belong to later chapters, and to a presumption of innocence that the law extends to everyone BAM has accused.

But the most telling fact about the takeover is what BAM itself did in June 2026, after the cameras found the story. It closed the Salem store. It parted ways with Brandon Best and Josh Johnson, the two insiders it had installed as the store’s new owners. And it reached out to Bryan Mansell about restitution for the Star Wars collection it had once sworn was an “undisclosed” stranger’s problem. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A A company that had spent its filings insisting the repossession was lawful, the resale arm’s-length, and the consignment claim baseless does not, as a rule, voluntarily unwind all three at once. The franchisees say the unwinding is the confession. Whatever a court eventually decides, BAM’s own retreat is the clearest evidence yet that the takeover did not look, in the end, the way the takeover was supposed to look.

Chapter Three

The critic and the crackdown

A LEGO YouTuber asked where one customer’s collection went; the company answered with a racketeering suit, a gag order, and, after a traffic stop, a search warrant that seized nothing.

The collection at the center of all of it was a stack of retired LEGO sets, Star Wars boxes, loose minifigures, that a man named Mansell had handed to a Bricks & Minifigs store on consignment. The paperwork was plain about who owned them. The consignment agreement, signed November 22, 2023, said in so many words that the merchandise “shall remain the property of Mansell until sold.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A When the goods went missing in the churn of a store changing hands, that single sentence became the seed of a public fight.

The man who watered it was Benjamin Schneider, a LEGO YouTuber who posts as “Reckless Ben.” He started asking, on camera, where the collection had gone, and then asking louder. The videos found an audience and kept climbing; by the time lawyers got involved the company’s own court filing would describe the “Publications” as having drawn on the order of 1.3 million views. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction What had begun as one consignor’s grievance was now a consumer-advocacy campaign with a running headcount in the seven figures.

BAM Franchising’s response was not a refund. It was a lawsuit, and not an ordinary one.

Thirteen counts

On May 27, 2026, BAM filed a verified complaint in Utah’s Fourth District Court, case No. 260402353, built around the Utah Pattern of Unlawful Activity Act, the state’s racketeering statute. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint The named defendants were Schneider himself, his company Reckless Ben LLC, the consignor Mansell, and a fourth man, Victor Nguyen, along with unnamed Does the complaint lumped together as the “Schneider Group.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint The pleading ran to thirteen counts and leaned on seven enumerated racketeering predicates, communications fraud, theft by deception, theft by extortion, criminal simulation, deceptive business practices, forgery, and obstruction. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint

To turn a critic into a racketeer, a complaint needs more than criticism, and BAM’s reached for it. The filing alleged a $200,000 extortionate demand tied to a threat that things would get “very bad,” a separate $300,000 demand built around “damaging videos,” and a $40,000 demand resting on a forged contract. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint It described props from the campaign as crimes: a counterfeit Guinness World Record certificate, fake raffle tickets, allegedly forged court papers. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint Those are the kinds of acts, fabricated documents, dollar demands, that have nothing to do with reputation and everything to do with the elements of a felony, which is precisely why they anchor the complaint.

What the complaint conspicuously did not contain was a finding that anything Schneider had said was false. On the contrary, by its own paragraph the pleading conceded that no court and no law-enforcement agency had ever found that BAM stole or wrongfully converted anyone’s property, and it characterized the underlying mess as a private, store-level dispute at an independently owned Salem franchise. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint These are allegations, sworn but undecided; none has been adjudicated. There is daylight, too, in the complaint’s own attributions: the $300,000 “damaging videos” demand it pleads is laid not at Schneider’s feet but at those of two non-defendants. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint

There is a documentary wrinkle that sits awkwardly beside the racketeering theory. Days before the suit, on May 21, BAM had circulated a corrective note about the dispute, the company’s own public account, later filed as an exhibit to the very complaint that called Schneider a criminal for talking about the same facts. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit G And in a separate Utah Business and Chancery Court case, No. 260200029, the franchisee side pressed its own claims against BAM over the seized store and the consigned collection. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint That suit’s exhibits included LEGO’s own letter stating, flatly, that “Bricks & Minifigs isn’t affiliated with the LEGO Group in any way”, a fact that cut against the store’s pitch, and the termination paperwork at the heart of the franchise fight. Exhibit A Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-A-LEGO-Email Exhibit D Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-D-Termination-Letter By June 4, 2026, in its own press release, BAM announced it had closed the Salem store, agreed to ‘part ways’ with the insiders who had taken over its inventory, and said it was prepared to compensate Mansell for the collection. BAM press release, June 4 2026

The order to take it down

Five days after filing, on June 2, 2026, BAM got what it most wanted: an order telling Schneider what he could say and ordering the videos gone. The Fourth District Court, through Judge Tony F. Graf, Jr., entered a temporary restraining order on BAM’s ex parte motion, that is, after hearing only one side. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction The order made no finding that any statement was false; it rested on a recital that BAM was “substantially likely to prevail.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction

Two of its clauses reached pure speech. Clause 5(j) barred Schneider going forward from “creating, posting, publishing and disseminating (or any republication thereof) any false, misleading, harassing, interfering, defamatory or unlawful images or content” about BAM. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction Clause 5(k) went further into the past tense, commanding that the already-published videos “be immediately removed and/or taken down from any online streaming platform.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction No bond was required, and a hearing on a longer-lasting injunction was set for June 22. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction

That same clause reached past the people BAM had actually sued. Clause 5(k) restrains publications relating to “the private legal dispute underlying this matter between Bryan and Chrystal” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction, naming, in the operative restraint, a non-party: Chrystal Law, who with her husband Benjamin Gorman ran the Salem store through BAMF Salem 1, LLC and is herself a plaintiff against BAM in the separate Utah Business and Chancery Court action, No. 260200029. Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint On June 16, 2026 the Law-Gorman side did exactly that. Through counsel Sarah Spencer, the former Salem franchisees moved to intervene on a limited basis and to modify or dissolve the June 2 order, and the motion is now in hand. Civil 260402353 - Intervenors (Law-Gorman-BAMF Salem) Motion to Dissolve TRO It makes the constitutional case directly: that Clause 5(k) is an unconstitutional prior restraint entered with no finding of falsity, that it is overbroad enough to sweep in true statements and reports of public court filings, and that an injunction cannot bind known non-parties who were never served, joined, or heard. Civil 260402353 - Intervenors (Law-Gorman-BAMF Salem) Motion to Dissolve TRO It reserves the franchisees’ rights under Utah’s anti-SLAPP statute, and it is pointedly careful to take no position on relief aimed at conduct the defendants are “alleged to have engaged in,” naming “true threats, doxxing, trespass, or impersonation.” Civil 260402353 - Intervenors (Law-Gorman-BAMF Salem) Motion to Dissolve TRO The objection is substantial: a speech-restraining order that binds people who were never named as defendants, about their own dispute, stands on especially thin constitutional ground.

An order forbidding speech before it is published, and compelling the deletion of speech already published, is the textbook definition of what the law calls a prior restraint, “the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights,” in the Supreme Court’s phrase, carrying a heavy presumption against its validity. Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson✓ Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart✓ Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan✓ The closest case on the facts is one in which the Court struck down an injunction against leaflets criticizing a businessman’s practices, holding that fear of commercial harm does not justify silencing the critic. Org. for a Better Austin v. Keefe✓ Utah’s own Supreme Court has said the same and added a procedural point that fits this order like a glove: a speech restraint entered without notice and a hearing is invalid. KUTV, Inc. v. Conder✓ BAM’s strongest answer is that it was enjoining conduct, threats, impersonation, not commentary; that defense is sturdiest as to the clauses about harassment and weakest as to the two that reach a published video. None of this has been resolved; the question of whether the speech clauses survive is exactly what the June 22 hearing was set to decide.

The order was not the only pressure on Schneider’s ability to speak and to fund the fight. BAM’s campaign extended to demands aimed at the platforms that carried him, takedown requests directed at Patreon and GoFundMe, the crowdfunding and subscription channels through which a working critic keeps the lights on. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Docket Case History Where a content-based gag dictates what may be published and a takedown demand reaches the money behind it, the squeeze is felt before any judge ever rules on whether a word of it was untrue.

A traffic stop, a warrant, and nothing seized

Then the dispute left the courthouse and turned into a criminal case.

After a traffic stop, the American Fork Police Department obtained Search Warrant No. 3352981. Its affiant, Officer Cole G. Richardson, swore he had been a “POST certified officer as of 2024” with “over a year” of experience; the warrant was signed by Fourth District Judge Roger W. Griffin. American-Fork-Police-Warrant-3352981-Search-Warrant The charge was stalking, and the warrant carried an unusual rider: authorization to seize LEGO merchandise. American-Fork-Police-Warrant-3352981-Search-Warrant Statement American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Probable-Cause-Statement The investigation was opened under the department’s own incident number and written up as a stalking-and-harassment matter. American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Stalking-Harassment-Incident-Report When officers executed the warrant, the return tells its own story. The line for what was taken reads: no items seized. American-Fork-Police-Warrant-3352981-Search-Warrant A warrant that named LEGO as its quarry came back empty.

The department’s own records name the officers. The raid was led by Richardson, with Lieutenant Q. Adamson on the perimeter, Officer J. Laycock at the point of the entry team, Sergeant Lott, and Officers Spencer Tonga, D. Gonzalez, Jensen and A. Neil; the case detective, W. Nicosia, authored the probable-cause statement. American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Stalking-Harassment-Incident-Report The affidavit invites one question on its face: its narrative dates the triggering incident to “March 3rd,” although the warrant was sworn and served on March 11 and the affidavit’s own surveillance note bears the later date, an inconsistency in a document submitted under oath. American-Fork-Police-Warrant-3352981-Search-Warrant A profile compiled for American Fork on the national giglio-bradylist.com Brady-list database flags a “Brady/Giglio concern” arising from the matter and asserts that the department “has refused or failed to fully identify its involved officers by complete legal name and headshot”, an aggregator’s characterization, offered here as such and not as an official disclosure.

Officers arrested Schneider anyway and booked him. American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Booking-Sheet Prosecutors filed a criminal information; he was advised of his rights, and the court entered a pretrial protective order. Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Advisement-of-Rights Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Information-and-Indictment Order Reckless-Ben-Provo-Misdemeanor-Case-261000376-Pretrial-Protective-Order Docket Case History Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Docket-Events It bears stating as plainly as the presumption demands: the criminal charges against Benjamin Schneider are unadjudicated. He has been accused, not convicted. Nothing here decides whether he did anything wrong.

Honesty about those charges cuts the other way, too, and the credibility of everything else here depends on saying so. The American Fork case is not only stalking; its second count is targeted residential picketing, and a companion case in Provo charges criminal trespass and disorderly conduct. Criminal - American Fork Probable Cause Affidavit - Stalking + Targeted Residential Picketing (261401094) The arresting officer’s sworn affidavit describes conduct well past posting videos: after being formally trespassed from a BAM insider’s American Fork home, Schneider and others returned to it repeatedly, parked outside with cars of people, photographed the house with the family inside, sent others to knock at the door, and planted a sign in the park strip bearing the resident’s face and the words “I stole a dying man’s life savings”; one visitor posed as a delivery driver to get a signature. Criminal - American Fork Probable Cause Affidavit - Stalking + Targeted Residential Picketing (261401094) Those acts are confrontational, and the State charges them as crimes. Schneider’s account is that they were attempts to serve civil process and to report a story the consignor’s family had asked him to pursue, against a man his videos accuse of helping strip a dying father’s collection, and the officer’s own report concedes the police understood the visitors “were trying to serve him civil papers.” Criminal - American Fork Probable Cause Affidavit - Stalking + Targeted Residential Picketing (261401094) Both readings can hold at once: the conduct was aggressive enough to charge, and the complainant was a BAM insider who phoned the police day after day to turn a business grievance into a criminal file. Which one a jury would credit is exactly what has not happened yet.

There is a second, uglier thing the record makes plain. BAM’s filings collect a wave of messages the company and the McNeff family received once the videos went viral: anonymous notes threatening to mail “explosive” sets and to burn the stores and headquarters, a message promising a bullet with the chief executive’s name on it, wishes of cancer on the family, racist abuse, and online comments musing that “buckshot solves a lot of issues.” Civil 260402353 Exhibit K - Threat Screenshots (messages BAM and the McNeff family received) Those threats are real and they are vile, and no account of who wronged whom should pretend that a family fielding bomb and death threats is a comfortable place to stand. But nearly every one of them is pseudonymous, sent from throwaway handles and burner accounts, and they read as the work of the furious audience a million-view accusation summons, not as anything traced to Schneider’s own hand. That gap is the whole of BAM’s racketeering theory, which bundles the mob into a “Schneider Group” and asks a court to hold the journalist answerable for what his viewers did. The law has long resisted that move: a speaker is not liable for the independent lawless acts of those who hear him, absent incitement. NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.✓ Whether BAM can bridge the gap is, again, undecided; that it has not is why the threats sit in an exhibit rather than in a verdict.

The criminal matter runs on two separate tracks: the Fourth District stalking case, State v. Schneider, No. 261401094 (stalking and targeted residential picketing) before Judge Thomas Low, with a hearing set for July 1, 2026; and a separate Provo City Justice Court case, No. 261000376 (disorderly conduct and criminal trespass) before Judge Stephen H. Schreiner, in which Schneider entered not-guilty pleas. Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Advisement-of-Rights Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Information-and-Indictment

Three of the people detained at the Airbnb that day, Sheldon Norcross, Sierra Lauts and Tyler Shaw, have since launched a public fundraiser, “Justice for Sheldon and Friends,” to pursue civil-rights litigation against the department; of the five taken into custody, only Schneider was booked into jail. The campaign states that counsel advised their “rights were likely violated” and that a civil-rights attorney is being retained. No suit has been filed, and the civil-rights claims are the organizers’ own, untested allegations.

What makes the arrest more than a footnote is what the body cameras recorded, and what the public was first allowed to see. The American Fork Police Department released its bodycam footage as a set of 56 clips, but only after editing it. According to the bodycam investigation built from the records, roughly three hours of video were blacked out, eleven clips were withheld entirely, and about ninety-four minutes of audio were muted. American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Stalking-Harassment-Incident-Report The deletions were not scattered at random; they clustered on exactly the moments that mattered, the officers’ own on-scene legal assessment, the warrant’s execution, and the arrest itself.

The reason anyone could measure the gap is that an unredacted copy of the same clips had leaked, and the leak was the department’s own mistake: a misconfigured Dropbox, not a hack. American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Stalking-Harassment-Incident-Report Laid frame against frame, the official release and the leaked original made the muted minutes legible again. In the recovered audio, the investigation describes officers talking themselves from “letting them go cannot be an option … send a message” to “you’re under arrest for stalking.” American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Stalking-Harassment-Incident-Report These are the documented findings of that bodycam comparison, drawn from leaked and public records and presented here as such, not as a court’s conclusion.

The recovered audio was not the only thing the black boxes had hidden. The same leak made one of the department’s in-car computer screens legible again, and it answers a question the official release did not: who set the matter in motion. The screen logs the reporting party as Johnson, with a narrative about a “suspicious package” and footage supplied by “my business partner.” American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Stalking-Harassment-Incident-Report That is Josh Johnson, one of the two insiders BAM installed as the Salem store’s new owners; his “business partner” is Brandon Best, the inventory inspector who became the other. The man who helped take over the store is also, on this record, the one who summoned the police against its loudest critic and handed officers the video. A company that answers a critic with a racketeering suit, a gag order, and a police referral is not a harassment victim defending itself; it is reaching for every institution it can. Whether that crosses into the misuse of legal process, or the kind of private-and-state coordination that civil-rights law reaches, is a question for the arrestees’ counsel to pursue; the charges against Schneider remain unadjudicated, and he is presumed innocent.

The law has names for the questions that exchange raises. A warrant to search a place does not, by itself, authorize arresting the people found there; probable cause must be particular to each person, and “mere propinquity” to someone else under suspicion is not enough. Ybarra v. Illinois✓ A search-warrant affidavit can be attacked if it was built on a deliberate or reckless falsehood. Franks v. Delaware✓ And because the underlying charge, stalking, framed as a course of conduct, is wrapped around a man’s filming and commentary, there is the further principle that constitutionally protected speech cannot itself supply the probable cause to search. Mink v. Knox✓ Whether any of those theories has teeth depends on a record that does not yet exist; they are the arguments available, not findings made.

Strip the case to its spine and a pattern shows through. A customer’s collection went missing. A critic asked where it went, loudly enough to be heard a million times over. The company answered not with the goods or a check but with a thirteen-count racketeering complaint BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint, an order to delete the videos BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction, demands to the platforms that paid him BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Docket Case History, and finally a stalking warrant that hunted for LEGO and seized nothing American-Fork-Police-Warrant-3352981-Search-Warrant. Utah’s racketeering statute reaches real predicates, fraud, forgery, extortion, and BAM has pleaded them; that is why the suit is not frivolous on its face. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint But the statute’s own enumeration does not include defamation, and courts have been clear that ordinary online criticism is not a racketeering act. Walker v. Beaumont Independent School District✓ Consumer commentary about a franchisor’s treatment of customers sits high in the order of protected speech Snyder v. Phelps✓; a quantified, checkable accusation that a named party “stole $200,000” does not, and a court could find such a charge actionable rather than mere opinion Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.✓ RainFocus Inc. v. Cvent Inc.✓. The two ends of that spectrum are why the fight is real, and why so much of it remains, for now, sworn but undecided. The June 22 injunction hearing, and a criminal case in which Benjamin Schneider is presumed innocent, would have to sort out which is which. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction

Chapter Four

Pull the thread

A toy-store franchise fight was never the real story; behind it stands a family business that spent a quarter-century teaching clients how to disappear from the reach of the law.

Everything to this point has been the surface. The toy store, the LEGO resale floors, the franchise that sells the right to buy and rebuild other people’s childhoods, all of it is real, and all of it is a distraction. Pull the thread and the franchise unspools into something older and stranger: a family, a doctrine, and a business model built on a single promise. The promise was that you could make yourself impossible to sue, and impossible to collect from.

The business was called Legally Mine. For most of its life it ran out of Orem, Utah, from an address it shared with a captive back-office company called LMRA Services, Inc. Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10165814 Detail Its product was an “asset protection plan”, that is the phrase a federal magistrate judge used, dryly, when a customer named Kasra Eliasieh sued the company in California over what he had bought. Eliasieh v. Legally Mine, LLC⏳ What that plan actually was, and whether selling it was legal, would take years and another state to settle.

The man at the center

The plan belonged to Daniel J. McNeff. He built Legally Mine and ran it, and around it he assembled a thicket of limited-liability companies that read, in retrospect, like a demonstration of his own curriculum. He came to the business of advising others about money with a securities-industry ban of his own: the NASD, the brokerage industry’s self-regulator, censured Daniel McNeff, fined him $15,000, and barred him from associating with any member firm in any capacity, in a decision that became final in January 1991, after he failed to answer the regulator’s questions about why a member firm had terminated him. Daniel J. McNeff: FINRA/NASD BrokerCheck (CRD 1193655) His registered securities career had run about six years, at a single small Georgia firm, and ended in that bar. Utah’s business registry ties Daniel McNeff personally to Legal Bear LLC Utah UCC: Legal Bear Business 8097970 Detail, to Procure LLC Utah UCC: Procure Business 10875462 Detail, to Team Dentistry LLC Utah UCC: Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Detail, to DDL Investments LLC Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 12343181 Detail, and to Medisource Marketing LLC Utah UCC: Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Detail, a row of innocuously named vehicles, each its own little fortress.

The fortress had a moat in Alaska, a state whose trust and charging-order statutes are friendly to people who do not want to be found by creditors. In November 2016 McNeff incorporated LMRA Services, Inc. as an Alaska corporation; the initial report listed him as the 100 percent owner and as director, president, secretary, treasurer, and shareholder all at once. Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah LMRA Services INC Annual Report LMRA then became the registered agent, the official mailbox and front door, for a sprawl of further entities, the agent of record for thousands of companies across Alaska and Utah. One was Legal Elf, LLC, formed in 2017 with Daniel and Evelyn McNeff as fifty-fifty members and LMRA as its agent. Legal Elf, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2017-10-12) As late as April 2026, with litigation closing in from several directions, a new Alaska company called Wize Grizzly, LLC was formed with Daniel McNeff as its 100 percent member and, again, LMRA as the registered agent. Wize Grizzly, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2026-04-24) The same machinery produced layered structures for others, too, paired Alaska entities like Kerala House 101 and 102, one made the general partner of the other, the exact nesting-doll arrangement the strategy prescribes. Kerala House 101, LLC: Articles of Organization (2026-05-04)

This was not a sideline. It was the whole shape of the thing: a teacher who lived inside his own lesson.

What the lesson cost

For roughly a quarter of a century, Legally Mine sold that lesson to clients, by its own account, on the order of twenty-one thousand of them, typically professionals with money to shield and a fear of being sued: doctors, dentists, small-business owners. The sales channel ran through trade conventions. According to the Ohio regulatory record, a dentist who attended a Legally Mine presentation at a dental convention in Canton, Ohio, enrolled in a premium package that promised an asset-protection blueprint and the legal-document work to build it. That enrollment is what eventually brought the whole enterprise before a state supreme court.

On November 10, 2023, the Ohio State Bar Association filed a complaint against Legally Mine and Daniel McNeff, charging that the company’s blueprint-and-document business was the unauthorized practice of law, drafting legal instruments and giving legal advice without a license. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History The matter went not to a trial but to a consent resolution: the respondents waived notice and a hearing, and the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law issued a final report. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order

On February 20, 2025, the Supreme Court of Ohio adopted it. In a one-paragraph order that carries the full weight of the court, “Legally Mine, L.L.C., and Daniel McNeff” were “enjoined from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in Ohio,” and a civil penalty was imposed. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Legally Mine, L.L.C.⏳ Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order The penalty was $5,000, and the order required the company to notify affected clients and offer refunds. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order Daniel McNeff did not contest that he had directed the conduct; the resolution rests on the respondents’ own waiver and consent. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order It is worth being precise about what the order is and is not: a consent decree, limited to Ohio conduct, not a fully litigated finding of fraud. But on the narrow question the bar association posed, was this business the practice of law without a license, the highest court in Ohio said yes, and shut it down there.

Ohio was not the only place the model drew fire. Years earlier, the Eliasieh case in California had already put the “asset protection plan” before a federal court, where it ended up routed into private arbitration. Eliasieh v. Legally Mine, LLC⏳ And in a Washington bankruptcy, a trustee challenged a Chapter 11 debtor’s $7,800 payment to Legally Mine for asset-protection services; according to the complaint the transfer was avoidable, and a judgment was ultimately entered against Legally Mine before being satisfied. Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc1 Complaint Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction of Judgment The product, in other words, kept generating the very lawsuits it claimed to make irrelevant.

Set those findings beside each other and a pattern in the man himself emerges. In 1991 the securities regulators censured Daniel McNeff, fined him, and barred him from associating with any brokerage firm. Daniel J. McNeff: FINRA/NASD BrokerCheck (CRD 1193655) In 2025 the Supreme Court of Ohio enjoined him from the practice of law. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order In the years between and since, he built and ran a business whose entire promise was legal and financial protection. Two different regulators, decades apart, found him without the standing to do the very things his company sold.

The sons, and the toys

Here is where the thread doubles back to the toy store. Daniel McNeff has two sons in the business, Ammon and Matthew, and the connective tissue between the asset-protection firm and the LEGO-resale franchise runs straight through them.

The franchise is operated by BAM Franchising, the company behind the Bricks & Minifigs brand. Its origins trace to an Oregon registration in 2011 Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896, and when that Oregon registration was administratively dissolved and then reinstated in 2020, the reinstatement was signed by Matthew McNeff as secretary, with both Ammon and Matthew listed in officer roles. Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896 A sister company, BAM IP Holdings LLC, holds the intellectual-property side; Utah’s registry names its managers as Ammon and Matthew McNeff. Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail On the franchise-sale paperwork itself, the state-filed Franchise Disclosure Documents, Ammon McNeff and Matthew McNeff appear among the listed sellers of the Bricks & Minifigs system. FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C057 FDD

So the two halves are not separate worlds. They are the same family operating two firms out of the same cluster of Utah towns: Legally Mine and LMRA in Orem Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10165814 Detail, BAM Franchising a few streets over Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Detail, BAM IP Holdings in Provo Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail.

And the two halves are stitched together by a financing document that ought to give any reader pause. In August 2020, a Utah UCC filing records that Legally Mine, the asset-protection company, pledged 450,000 shares of BAM Franchising as collateral, to secured parties named John Masek and David Ortiz. Utah UCC: Detail A second filing the following February pledged a 21 percent membership interest in Legally Mine itself, along with its business assets, this time naming Ammon and Matthew McNeff as the secured parties on a settlement note. Utah UCC: Detail The toy franchise was, on paper, security for the family’s debts; the family’s company was, on paper, security for the sons. The ownership of the toy store and the ownership of the shield were the same balance sheet.

The fight inside the family

That balance sheet did not hold together quietly. In January 2021, the family went to federal court against itself. A complaint filed in the District of Utah alleged, these are allegations, never adjudicated, the suit was voluntarily dismissed Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc12 Voluntary Dismissal 2021-02-10, that Daniel refused to cede authority over BAM’s payments, that the nonpayment triggered a repossession by the company’s sellers, and that more than a million dollars in assets were lost as a result. Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 Complaint 2021-01-22 Around the same time, in a letter, Daniel McNeff described the situation in his own words: the prior owners had been carrying the loan, he wrote, and Ammon and Matthew had been assigned to run BAM full-time. The picture is of a father, two sons, a toy company, and a debt, all pulling against one another.

Meanwhile the asset-protection side kept changing its skin. The original Legally Mine entity was reported to have become “LM OLDCO LLC” Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal, old company, the linguistic tell of a business shedding a name. And in 2026, fresh “Legally Mine” and “Legally Mine Tax and Accounting” assumed-name registrations appeared in Utah, this time owned not by Daniel but by an entity called Centra Wealth Solutions LLC Utah Registry: Filing History Legally Mine 2026 Entity 14441858 Filing History All Internal Utah Registry: Filing History Legally Mine Tax and Accounting 2026 Entity 14441864 Filing History All Int, with a different registered agent. Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail The brand survives; the legal shell beneath it has been quietly swapped out, which is, after all, the entire point of the product.

This is the real story, and it is bigger than a quarrel over secondhand toy bricks. It is a family that spent twenty-five years teaching strangers how to put their wealth beyond the reach of courts and creditors, and that, when the courts and creditors finally came, reached for the same tools on its own behalf. Everything else is the thread you pull. The McNeffs are what is on the other end.

The McNeffs did not invent the model; they bought into it. Legally Mine descends from the asset-protection seminar circuit of Jay Mitton, the self-styled “father of asset protection,” by way of the National Foundation for Asset Protection, which is how, on the firm’s own telling, Daniel McNeff came to it in 2007 as “a student of Mitton.” Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History The same lineage seeded a cluster of look-alike Orem mills, among them Veil Corporate LLC and Guardian Law LLC, both named in a private fraud suit tied to the Federal Trade Commission’s $16.7 million case against the Nudge seminar empire FTC v. Nudge, LLC⏳, though neither is McNeff-owned; the tie is a shared mentor and a shared town, not common ownership. The network surfaces once more around the Salem store itself: Josh Johnson, sold to the public as an “independent” new owner, doubles as an executive vice-president of a Las Vegas asset-protection firm, on a presenter roster he shares with the ex-FBI principal of an outfit called Fortress.

Chapter Five

The machine

As the litigation peaked and the cash-advance lenders closed in, the family that sold asset protection ran the same creditor-frustration playbook on its own collapsing franchise, and left the paperwork behind.

For two decades the product was a sentence, repeated at dental conventions and on glossy seminar slides: put the thing the creditor wants out of the creditor’s reach. A preserved Legally Mine sales video lays out the machinery in plain terms, an Alaska holding company on top, a charging-order shield underneath, a “non-prorata” distribution clause and a so-called revenge clause to make a judgment creditor’s victory worthless. The presenter on the recording is Dan McNeff. Legal Elf, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2017-10-12)

The pitch had already drawn a regulator’s verdict. On February 20, 2025, the Supreme Court of Ohio enjoined Legally Mine and Daniel McNeff from the unauthorized practice of law and imposed a civil penalty, a finding entered against both the company and the man. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order By then the asset-protection business was no longer just teaching the technique. It was using it, on the family’s own assets, while its creditors lined the hallway.

The trademarks move

Start with the brand, because the brand was the last thing worth anything. The Bricks & Minifigs franchise system runs on a name, and the federal registration for the standard-character mark BAM is owned by BAM Franchising, Inc., the operating company at the center of the litigation. USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901 In Utah’s corporate registry, that operating entity now reads “Inactive.” Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Detail

On July 16, 2025, while the franchisee lawsuits and the trademark fight were live, a new company was organized in Utah: BAM IP Holdings, LLC, filed active, its managers listed as Ammon McNeff and Matthew McNeff, the two sons running the franchise day to day. Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail Utah Registry: Filing History BAM IP Holdings LLC 14333873 Filing History All Internal The name is not subtle. A holding company called “IP Holdings,” spun up by the operators of a brand whose chief remaining asset is intellectual property, formed in the middle of the storm.

What the public record does not yet show is a recorded assignment moving the BAM marks out of the operating company and into the new holding company. A focused pass through the federal Assignment Center turned up no public assignment bridge from BAM IP Holdings to the sampled BAM or Bricks & Minifigs marks; the registered BAM mark still names BAM Franchising as owner. USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901 The Delaware redomestication did not move them either: the surviving Delaware corporation was supposed to inherit the Oregon company’s property by operation of law, yet the marks still name the old Oregon entity, leaving the title clouded across three boxes, the inactive Oregon shell that still holds the registrations, the Delaware survivor that supposedly absorbed it, and the Utah holding company built to receive it. Delaware Certificate of Merger: BAM Franchising (Oregon) into Delaware (File No. 2482543) So the transfer, if it happened, has not surfaced on paper, and that distinction matters. But the shape is the classic badge of a voidable transfer: an insolvent operating company, a new entity owned by insiders, the valuable asset re-housed where old creditors cannot easily reach it while the operating business keeps using the name. It is the exact move the seminar video taught, separate the asset from the entity the creditor can sue. Legal Elf, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2017-10-12) Whether a court will ever call it a fraudulent conveyance is undecided; the structure is on the registry. Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail

The husk and the resurrection

The second move is cleaner, and it is documented to the day. The company that had been sued for twenty years, Legally Mine, LLC, the original Utah entity formed back in January 2009, did not die. It was renamed. On May 21, 2026, an amendment to its certificate of organization ran through Utah’s Business Entity Search. Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization LM OLDCO LLC 6045616 Amendment to Certificate of Organization The thing once called Legally Mine became “LM OLDCO, LLC”, old company, the name a lawyer gives a shell after the good parts have been carried out the door. It did not happen only once: that same afternoon, by an identical amendment, the family’s tax-and-accounting arm, Legally Mine Tax and Accounting, LLC, was renamed to “LMTA OLDCO, LLC.” LMTA OLDCO, LLC: Amendment to Certificate of Organization (UT 2026-05-21) Two companies turned into two husks in a single sitting.

Eight days later, the good part reappeared. On May 29, 2026, a separate company registered the assumed name “LEGALLY MINE LLC” as a brand-new doing-business-as, and a companion DBA, “LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC.” Utah Registry: Filing History Legally Mine 2026 Entity 14441858 Filing History All Internal Utah Registry: Filing History Legally Mine Tax and Accounting 2026 Entity 14441864 Filing History All Int The certificate of assumed name for the revived “Legally Mine” brand is its own filing. Utah Registry: Assumed Name (DBA) Legally Mine 2026 Entity 6069703 Certificate of Assumed and of True Nam The owner of these freshly minted Legally Mine names is not the litigated entity. It is Centra Wealth Solutions, LLC. Utah Registry: Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 6061489 Registration Information Change Form

Read the sequence as a single gesture. The defendant in the lawsuits is hollowed into “LM OLDCO”, a husk for the judgments and the regulators to chase. Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization LM OLDCO LLC 6045616 Amendment to Certificate of Organization The living brand, the name customers recognize, the name on the asset-protection seminars, walks across the room into a clean company with no litigation history attached to it. Utah Registry: Assumed Name (DBA) Legally Mine 2026 Entity 6069703 Certificate of Assumed and of True Nam Utah Registry: Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 6061489 Registration Information Change Form Same product, same market, new shell. It is the corporate version of the non-prorata clause: leave the creditor holding the name that no longer owns anything.

Who is Centra

Centra Wealth Solutions, LLC was organized in Utah, with a certificate of organization on file and a registered agent, BTJD Corporate Services, LLC, that also serves the new Legally Mine DBAs. Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 5892820 Certificate of Organizatio Utah Registry: Filing History Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 14421835 Filing History All Internal Its managers, per the Utah registry, are two men: David Johnston and Mark Comer. Utah Registry: Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 6061489 Registration Information Change Form

The name Mark Comer carries weight. In 1999, after the collapse of the dot-com retail venture iMall, the Federal Trade Commission obtained a stipulated final judgment against iMall and two individuals, Craig R. Pickering and a Mark R. Comer: a $4 million consumer-redress judgment, $3.25 million of it owed by Pickering and Comer, and a five-year order barring each of them from marketing any business opportunity unless he first posted a $500,000 performance bond. FTC v. iMall, Inc.⏳ Whether the Mark Comer now steering the revived “Legally Mine” brand is that same man is corroborated but not confirmed, call it about ninety-five percent. The registry establishes the role; it does not, by itself, establish the identity. What the record does say cleanly is this: the company now holding the Legally Mine name is run by a man named Mark Comer, out of an address in Highland, Utah, that the old operating entity never used. Utah Registry: Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 6061489 Registration Information Change Form

That an asset-protection brand with a federal UPL injunction against it Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order should re-emerge under new managers, in a new entity, weeks after the litigated company was renamed to “OLDCO,” is the pattern stated once more, in a different key. The brand outruns its own record.

The lenders in the hallway

None of this happened in calm water. By 2025 the family’s flagship was being worked over by the merchant-cash-advance industry, the high-cost lenders who buy a business’s future receipts at a discount and then claw the money back by daily debit. The filings come in a cluster, and they rhyme.

In Connecticut, Swiss Fund LLC sued. Its complaint package pleads a future-receivables agreement dated March 10, 2025, a personal guaranty from McNeff, and a cross-collateral security interest backed by UCC filings, followed by default. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc The matter was withdrawn that July. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07 On the Connecticut docket, the defense appearance was entered by attorney Glenn Francis Russell Jr. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) Docket Case History These are allegations in a civil complaint; the case ended before any judgment on the merits. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07

In New York, Castle Funding Corp. sued the operating entity, alleging a purchased stream of future receivables, an ACH remittance that failed, a guaranty, and a balance of $55,428.66. Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint The Castle action was later discontinued. Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Notice of Discontinuance What makes the Castle file telling is its service roster: the papers reach not just Legally Mine but a row of commonly controlled satellites, DDL Investments LLC, Medisource Marketing LLC, Big Blue Bungalow LLC, and Daniel J. McNeff himself. Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint The lender, in other words, understood it was dealing with a constellation, not a company.

Also in New York, DIB Capital Inc. sued, and its numbers are the starkest. The complaint alleges DIB paid $300,000 to buy $480,000 of future receipts, a sixty-cents-on-the-dollar advance, at an 18% remittance rate, secured by a guaranty, with the receipts then allegedly blocked or impeded, and damages pleaded at $501,250. Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint That action resolved by a stipulation of settlement. Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Stipulation of Settlement Again: alleged, then settled, never adjudicated. But the picture across the three files is consistent, a business borrowing against tomorrow’s sales at punishing terms, then accused of choking off the very receivables it had pledged. Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc

The cross-collateral net

The most revealing artifact is the cross-collateral pledge itself, because it shows the machine wired together. The Connecticut docket names, alongside Legally Mine, five commonly controlled co-defendants: Legal Bear LLC, Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC, Procure LLC, Shield LLC, and Team Dentistry LLC. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07 The complaint package ties those affiliates to one principal, Daniel Jay McNeff, and identifies him as the signatory and guarantor. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc Utah’s UCC records carry the same cluster: a financing-statement chain repeating the identical roster of Legal Bear, Legally Mine Tax and Accounting, Procure, Shield, and Team Dentistry as related debtors. Utah UCC: Detail

So the same six entities that the asset-protection product would, in theory, keep walled off from one another were instead bound together, pledged as a single block of collateral to secure the family’s borrowing, all tied back to one man. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc Utah UCC: Detail The shield the company sold to outsiders was, for the family’s own lenders, melted into one pool.

And the family had been pledging its core assets for years before the 2025 lenders arrived. In August 2020, Legally Mine pledged 450,000 shares of BAM Franchising stock as collateral to John Masek and David Ortiz. Utah UCC: Detail In February 2021, a further UCC filing pledged a 21% membership interest in Legally Mine, plus business assets, to secure a settlement and promissory note valued at $1.728 million, with Ammon McNeff and Matthew McNeff, the same two sons who would later manage BAM IP Holdings, named as the secured parties. Utah UCC: Detail The sons held a lien on the family business before they held the brand’s new holding company. Utah UCC: Detail Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail

The pattern, named

Set the beats in a row. A regulator finds the asset-protection company practiced law without a license and enjoins it. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order The marks that carry the franchise sit in an operating company gone “Inactive,” Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Detail while a new insider-owned “IP Holdings” company appears mid-litigation. Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail The litigated brand is renamed to a husk, Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization LM OLDCO LLC 6045616 Amendment to Certificate of Organization and the brand itself is reborn days later inside a clean entity run by a man with a contested past. Utah Registry: Assumed Name (DBA) Legally Mine 2026 Entity 6069703 Certificate of Assumed and of True Nam Utah Registry: Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 6061489 Registration Information Change Form Cash-advance lenders circle, pleading guaranties and blocked receivables. Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint And underneath it all, six commonly controlled entities are lashed together as one block of collateral, tied to a single guarantor. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc Utah UCC: Detail

No court has yet ruled that any of these 2025, 2026 transfers was fraudulent; the MCA cases ended in withdrawal, discontinuance, and settlement rather than judgment. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07 Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Notice of Discontinuance Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Stipulation of Settlement The criminal matter touching this family remains unadjudicated, and the men named here are entitled to the presumption of innocence. But the documents describe a recognizable thing, and it is the thing the company taught. The family that sold the art of making assets disappear from creditors appears, on the record, to have practiced it last on itself, moving the brand, hollowing the defendant, binding the collateral, one filing at a time. The machine ran on its own builders. Legal Elf, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2017-10-12) Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization LM OLDCO LLC 6045616 Amendment to Certificate of Organization

And it is not only the lenders’ suits that ended without a verdict. Look at how nearly every dispute this family has touched is closed. The Ohio unauthorized-practice case was resolved by consent, on an express waiver of notice and a hearing, with no facts ever found. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History Its own federal lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed. Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc12 Voluntary Dismissal 2021-02-10 The California customer’s case was steered out of court into private arbitration. Eliasieh v. Legally Mine, LLC⏳ And the answer to a critic was a gag order obtained without a hearing. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction Each of these is a lawful way to end a case; the consistency is the tell. A business built to make assets hard to find is run by people who, matter after matter, also make the facts hard to test, closing each one by consent, dismissal, arbitration, or settlement before a neutral adjudicator can weigh the evidence. The asset-protection product and the litigation habit are one instinct aimed at two targets, and it is why the single thing that can force a tested record, an anti-SLAPP special motion, is the most dangerous motion in this file for Bricks & Minifigs.

And the control-grab at the center of this story was not the first of its kind. In a 2020 complaint, a former business associate named David Gibb alleged that Ammon McNeff had gone to the Utah Division of Corporations in November 2019, falsely declared himself the sole owner and registered agent of an LLC he did not own, and then redirected its merchant-account funds to an account he controlled. Afraid OF Lawsuits, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2019-11-12) The mechanism is the one the Salem franchisees describe: a paper filing that manufactures control, then a quiet move of the money. That case was dismissed without prejudice within months, never tested on the merits, which is itself the pattern; but a sworn allegation of the same maneuver, against a McNeff insider, years before the toy-store fight, sits on the record.

What follows from all of this, whether any of it is a crime, a tort, or a winnable defense, is laid out claim by claim in the legal reckoning further down, every theory graded for how far the record carries it. First, where this can actually go.

Chapter Six

The way in

After the entities, the liens, and the lawsuits, what is actually proven, what is sealed behind unfiled paper, and which regulators already hold enough to act.

Strip away the noise and a story like this comes down to three columns: what a court has already decided, what the primary documents prove on their face, and what remains an allegation someone still has to win. The honest version of this article keeps those columns separate. So here, at the end, is the ledger.

What a court has already decided

One thing is adjudicated. On February 20, 2025, the Ohio Supreme Court entered a final order enjoining Legally Mine and Daniel J. McNeff and imposing a civil penalty. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Legally Mine, L.L.C.✓ The Ohio State Bar Association had brought the matter as unauthorized practice of law, the claim that a company selling asset-protection “blueprints” and entity paperwork to dentists and doctors was, in substance, practicing law without a license. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History The board’s record traces the funnel precisely: an Ohio dentist who sat through a Legally Mine presentation at a Canton dental convention and enrolled in a program promising legal-document work. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History

That order is real, and it is a finding. But it should be read for exactly what it is. The Ohio docket shows the disposition was a consent decree, entered on a board report with the respondents’ express waiver of notice and hearing. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History A consent decree is generally not “actually litigated,” so it carries no automatic preclusive weight in another state, and its reach is limited to Ohio conduct. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Legally Mine, L.L.C.✓ The decree’s recital that the conduct “constitutes” unauthorized practice is an admission usable as evidence, not a nationwide judgment. The pattern Ohio addressed is the strongest single fact in this whole file; it is also the narrowest.

What the documents prove on their face

A second tier needs no trial, because the proof is the paper itself.

The franchise disclosure document contradicts itself. BAM’s 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document states in Item 1 that “We have no parents or predecessors that are required to be disclosed,” while Item 2, in the bio of chief financial officer Reed Brimhall, states that he “has been the Chief Financial Officer of the Franchisor and the Franchisor’s Parent since June 2016.” FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 The same document says BAM is a Delaware corporation formed October 11, 2023, that completed a Delaware survivor merger on April 18, 2024, a clean origin story for an entity whose Bricks & Minifigs system has been registered and operating since 2011. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896 Delaware Certificate of Merger: BAM Franchising (Oregon) into Delaware (File No. 2482543) These are the franchisor’s own sworn disclosures, filed with state franchise regulators. A reader does not need discovery to see that an Item 1 promising no parent cannot live in the same booklet as an Item 2 describing a parent the CFO has run since 2016. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026

And the most telling contradiction is an absence. BAM’s own complaint says it repossessed the Salem store in November 2024, and that the store passed in March 2025 to Baker, a company owned by BAM’s own repossession inspector and a BAM recruiter. Yet the same year’s FDD reports zero Oregon outlets reacquired by the franchisor in 2024 and zero sold to franchisees in 2025, and it skips the very financial-statement note that should have explained a Salem sale. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint The transaction at the center of this story is the one the regulatory filing leaves out, and a sale to a company a BAM employee co-owns is precisely the related-party deal a disclosure document is meant to spell out. BAM calls the sale arm’s-length, and it may have been, but the two are not opposites: a fair-terms deal between a company and its own employee is still a related-party transaction, and the audited financials a franchise filing requires must set those out, with their terms, in the footnotes. None appears, for Salem or for the Eugene store also sold to Baker, a gap a franchise examiner can act on by requiring corrected financials and holding the registration until they are filed. Oregon Registry: Eugene Baker Bricks INC OR Filing Records

The insider resale is on the record. The bankruptcy schedules of franchisee Jace & Ace listed BAM Franchising as the franchise counterparty, and the disclosure statement records BAM agreeing to assume the franchise agreement with a twelve-month extension. Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc23 Schedules Original Jace Ace LLC Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc29 Disclosure Statement for Small Business When a franchise location failed, the chain ran from the independent franchisee to a company-owned store and onward to new buyers, a structure the legal file ties to a March 27, 2025 asset-purchase agreement moving the Salem store to Baker-affiliated buyers. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks & Minifigs 2023 FDD That a franchisor took over, then resold, a distressed location is not an accusation; it is a transaction visible in the filings.

The family built a separate box for the intellectual property. BAM IP Holdings LLC is its own Utah entity, managed by Ammon McNeff and Matthew McNeff, at its own Provo address, named for the one asset it exists to hold. Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization BAM IP Holdings LLC 5227635 Certificate of Organization Meanwhile the operating company, BAM Franchising, pledged its assets to JPMorgan Chase and watched Legally Mine pledge 450,000 of its shares to outside lenders. Utah UCC: Detail The marks the franchise is built on still name BAM Franchising as their owner, not the holding company, so the box meant to keep them one entity beyond a creditor’s or a franchisee’s reach is built and waiting, the transfer itself not yet on the public record. USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901 Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Name History

And the name itself has been re-homed. “Legally Mine” as a live brand is now an assumed name owned by Centra Wealth Solutions LLC, with BTJD Corporate Services as its registered agent, a fresh wrapper around an old product. Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail Utah Registry: Filing History Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 14421835 Filing History All Internal Centra’s managers of record are Mark Comer and David Johnston. Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail On Comer specifically the record supports a strong inference, not a certainty: the link to the iMall-era promoter of the same name is corroborated at roughly ninety-five percent, and this article does not state it as confirmed.

What is still only alleged

The third column is the one that disciplines everything above it.

No court has found that the people who bought these asset-protection plans were defrauded into measurable losses. The closest adjudicated event runs the other way: in a Washington bankruptcy, a Chapter 11 debtor’s $7,800 payment to Legally Mine was avoided and a judgment entered against the company in 2019, then fully satisfied months later. Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc1 Complaint Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc8 Judgment.ocr Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction of Judgment That is a single avoided transfer, paid off, not a finding of a fraud scheme. The fraud-in-the-inducement theory against the franchise disclosures, that franchisees relied on an “authorized LEGO reseller” pitch and the contradictory FDD and lost money, remains a theory; there is no private right of action under the FTC Franchise Rule, and the state-law fraud and rescission claims would have to be pleaded and proven, with a real risk that an arbitration clause sends them to an arbitrator before a court ever reaches them. Coraud LLC v. Kidville Franchise Co.✓

The fraudulent-transfer chain is alleged, not established. Utah’s voidable-transactions statute could reach an insider transfer made by an insolvent debtor for less than reasonably equivalent value, but the controlling Tenth Circuit authority makes “reasonably equivalent value” a genuine, fact-bound fight, and the cleanest pleaded transfer points at Daniel McNeff and Legally Mine, not at the franchise buyers. Utah Code Ann. § 25-6-203✓ White v. Wardley (In re White)✓ Veil-piercing to “the family and its entities” is an unsettled horizontal extension of a doctrine Utah courts apply with great caution and reserve as a last resort. Jones & Trevor Marketing, Inc. v. Lowry✓ M.J. v. Wisan✓

And the criminal charges are unadjudicated. Benjamin Schneider, the critic behind the videos, faces criminal process in Utah, but a charge is not a conviction, and the presumption of innocence is absolute. Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Information-and-Indictment The civil RICO-style complaint BAM filed against him pleads extortion and fraud predicates that are contested in both amount and actor: the headline “$200,000 stolen” figure traces to a 2023 store promotional valuation, the genuinely unexplained accounting gap is alleged at closer to $10,000, $20,000, and BAM’s own verified complaint concedes that no court or law-enforcement body has found that BAM stole or converted anything. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint These are allegations on both sides of a private dispute, sworn but undecided.

The walls

Three things this investigation could not get past, and they matter as much as anything it found.

The Baker asset-purchase agreement is unfiled. The March 27, 2025 document that would show what the Salem store actually sold for, and whether the consideration was arm’s-length, is the hinge of the successor-liability and fraudulent-transfer theories, and it is exactly the paper that has not been produced. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks & Minifigs 2023 FDD Without it, “the franchisor resold a distressed store” cannot become “the franchisor moved assets to evade creditors.”

The franchise filing cannot keep its own corporate story straight on whether BAM even has a parent. BAM’s own audited financial statements answer it: they consolidate at BAM Franchising, Inc. as the top entity, with only wholly-owned subsidiaries beneath it, so the likeliest reading is a contradictory filing, not a concealed parent.The FDD admits, in the CFO’s own bio, that a “Franchisor’s Parent” exists, while Item 1 declines to name one. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 The certified Delaware record is now in hand, and it settles the lineage against a hidden parent: the State of Delaware’s Certificate of Merger shows the Oregon “BAM Franchising, Inc.” merged into a same-named Delaware corporation that survived, the company redomesticated into a fresh shell of itself, signed by Ammon McNeff as president, effective for accounting purposes on December 18, 2023 and filed with Delaware on April 18, 2024. Delaware Certificate of Merger: BAM Franchising (Oregon) into Delaware (File No. 2482543) Delaware Registry: Delaware BAM Franchising Entity Status BAM did not merge up into a parent; it moved its own state of incorporation from Oregon to Delaware. And the absence of a parent sharpens the asset story rather than softening it: the value moved sideways, not up, toward BAM IP Holdings, the sons’ own sister company stood up to hold the brand one entity over from anyone a creditor could reach, even as the marks themselves still name BAM Franchising as owner and the recorded transfer has not yet surfaced. The vehicle is built; the title is clouded; that is the move in mid-stride, not a finished one. Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901

And the Comer identity is corroborated, not confirmed. The thread that would connect today’s “Legally Mine” wrapper to a much older promotional world runs through Mark Comer’s name, and a shared name, on this record, is about ninety-five percent, which is not the same as proven. Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail

The way in

Here is the point of laying it all out. The people best positioned to act on this file need no further discovery, because the contradictions are already sitting in records they hold.

State franchise examiners and the Federal Trade Commission already possess the self-contradicting FDD. Minnesota registered and later cancelled BAM’s franchise offering; Wisconsin holds a 2026 registration that lists the organizing state as Oregon even as the FDD claims a Delaware identity. Franchise Reg: MN Cards E1722ECD Order Registration Franchise Reg: MN Cards FEA39BFE Order Cancelling Registration Franchise Reg: WI Dfi BAM Franchising Registration Detail Item 1 versus Item 2 is not something a journalist had to reconstruct, it is a discrepancy on file with the very regulators empowered to demand an amended disclosure or pull the registration. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 16 C.F.R. § 436.5✓

The SBA’s Office of Inspector General can pull a loan file in an afternoon. The IRS-levy complaint in this record alleges a conflict between Legally Mine’s representations and a federal pandemic-relief certification, an allegation, not a proven loan, and stated here as nothing more. Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 Complaint 2021-01-22 But an inspector general does not need a journalist’s inference; it can retrieve the underlying Paycheck Protection Program application and certification directly and see for itself whether the representations square.

State bar unauthorized-practice authorities have a template. Ohio already adjudicated the pattern. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order The same conduct, selling legal-document work and entity structuring across state lines, is reachable by the Utah and Oregon bar regulators through their own injunction-and-restitution machinery, on the long-standing civil-enforcement track that does not depend on the newest, non-retroactive statutes. Utah Code § 78A-9-103✓ ORS §§ 9.160 / 9.166✓ Ohio’s consent decree is persuasive regulatory history they can build on.

Consumer-protection attorneys general have the marketing in hand. A preserved Legally Mine video teaches the Alaska holding-company, charging-order, and “revenge-clause” strategy in the company’s own voice, exactly the kind of cross-border solicitation a state AG examines for deceptive practices, against the backdrop of an out-of-state bar’s UPL finding. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order

One caution governs publication. Benjamin Schneider is under a gag. The ex parte temporary restraining order entered against him on June 2, 2026 includes clauses that forward-bar his speech about the plaintiffs and compel takedown of already-published videos with more than 1.3 million views, a posture that bears the heavy presumption against prior restraints that has stood since the Supreme Court vacated an injunction against publication in 1931. Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson✓ Org. for a Better Austin v. Keefe✓ Whatever the merits of that order, it means the most visible complainant is the one least able to speak. Counsel walking any of these doors should choose a complainant who is not muzzled, a franchisee, a former client, a consignor, and let the documents, not the gagged man, do the talking.

The gag may also prove a boomerang. Utah’s Public Expression Protection Act, the state’s anti-SLAPP statute, exists for exactly this fact pattern: a lawsuit aimed at punishing speech on a matter of public concern. A special motion under it freezes discovery the instant it is filed, forces the plaintiff to come forward with admissible proof that its case can actually win, dismisses with prejudice what cannot, and shifts the speaker’s legal fees onto the party that sued. Utah Code § 78B-25-101 et seq. (UPEPA)✓ Mackey v. Krause✓ The window to file it has not closed, and a national franchise that sued a YouTuber for racketeering and won a takedown order without a hearing is, on that motion, the party with the most to lose: the exposure runs toward Bricks & Minifigs, not toward its critic. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction

That is the whole reason to put this in one place. No single record in this file is a verdict. The Ohio order is narrow. The FDD contradiction is damning but civil. The transfers are alleged. The criminal case is unproven and the man at its center is presumed innocent. But the records do not contradict one another about the shape of the thing: the same family, the same Orem and Provo addresses, the same registered agents, the same product re-homed under a new name, the same assets pledged and the same intellectual property held one entity to the side. Utah UCC: Detail Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail Spread across a dozen states and as many dockets, each piece looks like an isolated dispute. Assembled, with every claim marked for what it is, it becomes something a regulator can follow without a single new subpoena. The connections were always there. The way in is simply to see them together.

Figure 1 · the whole webThe connection map

Every node is a documented entity, person, creditor, or court; every edge is a documented relationship. Click any node to see who it connects to, and for each connection, the relationship, why it matters, its grade, and the citation. Solid lines are documented relationships; dashed lines mark deliberate non-connections (an undisclosed parent we can prove exists but not name; an identity held at ~95%; same-industry firms that share only a mentor, never ownership). Use the cluster chips to isolate part of the web; the zoomed cluster maps below break it out group by group. Prefer it full-screen? Open the standalone interactive map ↗, drag, zoom, search, and click any node for its connections.

Show allMcNeff & Legally Mine clusterBricks & Minifigs (BAM)Brand handoffSalem takeover & the criticAsset-protection industryCreditorsCourts & agencies

Click any node to trace its relationships, why each one matters, and its source.

Fig. 1, The complete network. The full entity list is in “The cast”; every edge with its citation is in “Every relationship.”

Zoomed in, cluster by cluster

McNeff & Legally Mine cluster

Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)

Brand handoff

Salem takeover & the critic

Asset-protection industry

Creditors

Courts & agencies

Figure 2 · the chronologyHow it unfolded

The main arc

2003 – 2010

David Ortiz (concept, 2003) and John Masek found Bricks & Minifigs in Battle Ground, WA, growing to ~41 stores.

2007

Daniel McNeff acquires Legally Mine as “a student of Jay Mitton,” via the National Foundation for Asset Protection.

Jun 2016

Reed Brimhall becomes CFO of BAM and the Franchisor’s Parent, the parent no FDD ever names.

2018

The McNeffs buy BAM, seller-financed; Legally Mine pledges 450,000 shares (≈49.6%) to Masek and Ortiz.

2020

Legally Mine takes a $1,393,440 PPP loan. A family arbitration removes Daniel as manager; the sons later swear he misappropriated the PPP money.

Nov 22 2023

Bryan Mansell consigns his father’s Star Wars LEGO collection to the Gormans’ store in Keizer/Salem, Oregon.

Apr 18 2024

BAM completes its Delaware survivor merger.

Nov 14 2024

BAM terminates the Gormans, repossesses the Salem store, demands $97,393.70.

Jan – Mar 2025

BAM transfers Salem to “Baker Salem”, its own recruiter (Johnson) and its own repossession inspector (Best).

Feb 20 2025

Ohio Supreme Court: Legally Mine + Daniel McNeff practiced law unlawfully; injunction, refund, $5,000 penalty.

Apr – Jun 2025

Merchant-cash-advance creditors sue, Swiss (CT), DIB and Castle (NY); the Castle complaint names eleven co-defendants.

Jul 16 2025

BAM IP Holdings is formed to hold the trademarks, while BAM Franchising is insolvent.

Aug 11 2025

The 450,000-share Utah UCC pledge lapses, no continuation, no recorded foreclosure.

Mar 2026

American Fork PD stops, search-warrants (#3352981) and arrests Reckless Ben and others. Warrant return: “no items seized.”

May 2026

Reckless Ben publishes; BAM files the Utah RICO suit (260402353) and obtains a TRO; Patreon and GoFundMe takedowns follow.

May 29 2026

AFPD releases the redacted bodycam, and accidentally exposes the unredacted folder in its own public Dropbox (~82 GB).

Jun 4 2026

BAM “parts ways” with Best and Johnson; the Salem store closes. The Legally Mine brand has already moved to Centra’s assumed names.

The complete chronology, every documented event (204)

Date	Event	Cluster	Grade	Source
2000-01-14	Texas Comptroller detail excerpt lists effective Texas SOS registration date for `BAM PRODUCTS, INC.` as `2000-01-14`. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2001-05-03	Entity record captured for `SHIELD CORPORATION` with status `Inactive` and identity key `SHIELD-CORPORATION-4916731-0142`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Shield Business 4916731 Detail
2004-10-07	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Certificate of Organization with filing number 5746616-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History BTJD Corporate Services LLC 5746616 Filing History All Internal
2008-07-01	USPTO Assignment Center summary row associates `BUG BAM!` with current owner `BUG BAM PRODUCTS LLC` (serial 77054592, registration 3456254). medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2008-11-04	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Commercial Registered Agent Listing Statement with filing number 7187183-0250. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History BTJD Corporate Services Commercial Registered Agent 7187183 Filing History
2008-12-04	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 5746616-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History BTJD Corporate Services LLC 5746616 Filing History All Internal
2009-01-05	Entity record captured for `LEGALLY MINE, LLC` with status `Expired` and identity key `LEGALLY-MINE-LLC-7228976-0142`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14261919 Detail
2009-01-05	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Certificate of Organization with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2009-01-05	Original Utah `LEGALLY MINE, LLC` entity formed/effective per official Utah capture; later expired/name-history issues remain in the entity lane. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED
2009-01-23	RDAP registration date for the Bricks & Minifigs public domain. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2010-07-08	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Amendment Art of Org Issuance of Member Interest with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2010-08-23	Entity record captured for `SHIELD, LLC, THE` with status `Active` and identity key `SHIELD-LLC-THE-7763582-0160`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Shield Business 7763582 Detail
2011-01-05	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Amendment Art of Org Issuance of Member Interest with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2011-04-29	Oregon SOS filing-record PDF lists registration date `04/29/2011` for registry `76881896`. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896
2011-04-29	Oregon SOS record shows BAM Franchising registration date 04/29/2011; later 08/05/2020 reinstatement has Matthew McNeff signature and Ammon/Matthew officer roles. medium-high: establishes BAM origin and McNeff officer/control signal; still not Legally Mine fraud proof.		CONFIRMED	Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896
2011-04-29	Oregon-origin formation date appears in 2023 Minnesota FDD and Oregon SOS filing-record evidence. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896
2011-09-08	Entity record captured for `LEGAL BEAR LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `LEGAL-BEAR-LLC-8097970-0160`. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Legal Bear Business 8097970 Detail
2012-05-23	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 5746616-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History BTJD Corporate Services LLC 5746616 Filing History All Internal
2012-11-14	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2012-12-04	USPTO Assignment Center summary row associates `BRICKS & MINIFIGS` with current owner `BAM FRANCHISING INC.` (serial 85349593, registration 4255472). medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2013-07-23	USPTO Assignment Center summary row associates `BRICKS & MINIFIGS REBUILD, REUSE, REIMAGINE!` with current owner `BAM FRANCHISING INC.` (serial 85349601, registration 4370630). medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2014-01-01	Utah DWS / Workforce Services target `146404514` captured as `MISSING`; Nothing yet; current local bundle acquired adjacent DWS/tax dockets but not this exact docket. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED
2014-01-01	Utah DWS / Workforce Services target `146404515` captured as `MISSING`; Nothing yet; current local bundle acquired adjacent DWS/tax dockets but not this exact docket. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED
2014-01-01	Utah DWS / Workforce Services target `146404566` captured as `MISSING`; Nothing yet; current local bundle acquired adjacent DWS/tax dockets but not this exact docket. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED
2014-01-01	Utah DWS / Workforce Services target `146404571` captured as `MISSING`; Nothing yet; current local bundle acquired adjacent DWS/tax dockets but not this exact docket. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED
2014-01-01	Utah DWS / Workforce Services target `146404951` captured as `MISSING`; Nothing yet; current local bundle acquired adjacent DWS/tax dockets but not this exact docket. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED
2014-01-01	Utah DWS / Workforce Services target `156401663` captured as `MISSING`; Nothing yet; current local bundle acquired adjacent DWS/tax dockets but not this exact docket. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED
2014-01-01	Utah DWS / Workforce Services target `156401664` captured as `MISSING`; Nothing yet; current local bundle acquired adjacent DWS/tax dockets but not this exact docket. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED
2014-03-28	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2014-04-01	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2014-11-20	Entity record captured for `MEDISOURCE MARKETING, LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `MEDISOURCE-MARKETING-LLC-9224895-0160`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Detail
2014-12-08	Entity record captured for `DDL INVESTMENTS, LLC` with status `Inactive` and identity key `DDL-INVESTMENTS-LLC-9234745-0160`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 9234745 Detail
2014-12-11	DWS target `140401736` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-04-06	Utah State Tax Commission target `156402805` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-06-08	Multiple Utah State Tax Commission docket sheets against Legally Mine acquired in Bloomberg bundle. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED
2015-06-08	Utah State Tax Commission target `156404437` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-06-08	Utah State Tax Commission target `156404444` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-06-08	Utah State Tax Commission target `156404446` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-06-08	Utah State Tax Commission target `156404450` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-06-08	Utah State Tax Commission target `156404459` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-06-08	Utah State Tax Commission target `156404473` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-06-08	Utah State Tax Commission target `156404475` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2015-08-24	U.S. Tax Court/IRS target `021428-15` captured as `ACQUIRED`; Docket existence and filed-date metadata only; not lien release/current status. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2016-01-12	Minnesota registered BAM Franchising franchise offering file F-7847. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		CONFIRMED	Franchise Reg: MN Cards E1722ECD Order Registration
2016-08-03	Notice of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder against LEGALLY MINE LLC; entry 72347/2016. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2016-11-17	LMRA initial report listed Daniel J. McNeff as 100% owner and Director, President, Secretary, Shareholder, and Treasurer. high: establishes direct Daniel McNeff control of the registered-agent infrastructure, not just name similarity.		CONFIRMED	—
2016-11-17	Alaska official corporation bulk record shows LMRA Services, Inc. formed/registered; registered agent listed as Deborah Rogers medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	—
2016-11-17	LMRA Services, Inc. formed as Alaska business corporation; original formation PDF includes wealth-maintenance purpose language and initial registered-agent/incorporator details. high: proves McNeff-linked Alaska infrastructure began with explicit wealth-maintenance purpose language matching the asset-protection product theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2016-11-18	Entity record captured for `LMRA SERVICES, INC.` with status `Inactive` and identity key `LMRA-SERVICES-INC-10165814-0143`. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10165814 Detail
2016-12-09	Notice of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder against LEGALLY MINE LLC; entry 123878/2016. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2017-01-16	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History Default
2017-01-19	Notice of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder against LEGALLY MINE LLC; entry 5108/2017. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2017-03-28	Notice of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder against LEGALLY MINE LLC; entry 29413/2017. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2017-04-03	Peterson adversary complaint alleges Chapter 11 debtors paid Legally Mine $7,800 for asset-protection services before judgment avoided the transfer. medium-high: direct example of Legally Mine asset-protection payment challenged in bankruptcy; complaint allegation becomes stronger because later judgment entered.		ASSERTED	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc1 Complaint
2017-04-05	Alaska official corporation bulk record shows Legal Bear, LLC formed/registered; registered agent listed as LMRA Services, Inc. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	—
2017-04-05	Entity record captured for `BIG BLUE BUNGALOW, LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `BIG-BLUE-BUNGALOW-LLC-10331756-0160`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Detail
2017-05-17	Notice of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder against LEGALLY MINE LLC; entry 47524/2017. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2017-05-23	Notice of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder against LEGALLY MINE LLC; entry 49223/2017. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2017-07-20	Notice of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder against LEGALLY MINE LLC; entry 69995/2017. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2017-10-12	Legal Elf initial report listed Daniel McNeff and Evelyn McNeff as 50/50 members, with LMRA as registered agent. high: establishes direct family ownership of the Legal Elf Alaska entity at formation.		CONFIRMED	Legal Elf, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2017-10-12)
2017-10-12	Official Alaska live entity detail lists Legal Elf, LLC as Involuntarily Dissolved with AK formed date 10/12/2017 and next biennial due 1/2/2025. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	—
2017-12-27	Release of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder for lien entry 72347/2016; release entry 128534/2017. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2018-01-29	Entity record captured for `LMRA SERVICES, INC.` with status `Active` and identity key `LMRA-SERVICES-INC-10694354-0250`. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10694354 Detail
2018-03-27	Release of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder for lien entry 5108/2017; release entry 28466/2018. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2018-06-14	Entity record captured for `PROCURE, LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `PROCURE-LLC-10875462-0160`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Procure Business 10875462 Detail
2018-06-18	Eliasieh I filed against Legally Mine in N.D. Cal. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED
2018-06-26	Release of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder for lien entry 123878/2016; release entry 59487/2018. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2018-06-26	Release of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder for lien entry 47524/2017; release entry 59488/2018. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2018-06-26	Release of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder for lien entry 69995/2017; release entry 59489/2018. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2018-09-04	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Certificate of Organization with filing number 10950141-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Shielld LLC 10950141 Filing History All Internal
2018-09-25	Release of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder for lien entry 29413/2017; release entry 91530/2018. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2019-02-19	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History Default
2019-02-25	Bankruptcy adversary judgment avoided the $7,800 payment and entered judgment against Legally Mine. high: adjudicated avoided-transfer/judgment event tied to Legally Mine asset-protection services in bankruptcy context.		ADJUDICATED	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc8 Judgment.ocr
2019-04-03	Standalone Eliasieh order/opinion `2019 BL 120931` acquired. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		ADJUDICATED
2019-04-03	Notice of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder against LEGALLY MINE LLC; entry 27154/2019. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2019-05-01	Ohio board report says an Ohio dentist attended a Legally Mine presentation at a Canton dental trade convention and enrolled in Premium+/Entity Creation CAP promising asset-protection blueprint/legal-document work. high: connects sales funnel, asset-protection product, and legal-document work later addressed by Ohio UPL order.		ASSERTED	—
2019-05-20	Minnesota cancelled BAM F-7847 registration for failure to file annual report/fee. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		CONFIRMED	Franchise Reg: MN Cards FEA39BFE Order Cancelling Registration
2019-05-24	Peterson adversary satisfaction of judgment filed; judgment against Legally Mine acknowledged as fully paid. medium-high: shows pressure/collections context; fraud inference depends on asset-transfer timing and documents.	bankruptcy	CONFIRMED	—
2019-05-24	Satisfaction of judgment filed after Peterson adversary judgment against Legally Mine. medium-high: shows judgment was paid/satisfied; useful boundary against overstating continuing liability.		CONFIRMED	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction of Judgment
2019-06-18	Release of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder for lien entry 27154/2019; release entry 55157/2019. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2019-07-22	Release of federal tax lien indexed by Utah County Recorder for lien entry 49223/2017; release entry 67900/2019. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	—
2019-09-24	Eliasieh II refiled post arbitration; public Doc. 1 acquired, attachment 4 unavailable. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED
2019-09-30	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 10950141-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Shielld LLC 10950141 Filing History All Internal
2019-10-31	Entity record captured for `LEGALLY MINE TAX & ACCOUNTING` with status `Inactive` and identity key `LEGALLY-MINE-TAX-ACCOUNTING-11521063-0151`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 11521063 Detail
2020-01-08	Alaska official corporation bulk record shows Legally Enlighten, LLC formed/registered; registered agent listed as Registered Agents Inc medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	—
2020-01-21	Jace schedules list BAM Franchising as unsecured creditor and franchise-agreement counterparty. medium-high: shows BAM franchise creditor/counterparty role in franchisee bankruptcy; useful for BAM economics, not McNeff fraud by itself.		CONFIRMED	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc23 Schedules Original Jace Ace LLC
2020-01-22	Jace & Ace and Klima bankruptcy materials begin public-document cluster. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.	bankruptcy	CORROBORATED
2020-01-23	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 10950141-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Shielld LLC 10950141 Filing History All Internal
2020-01-31	LMRA biennial filings from 2020 through 2025 continue Daniel J. McNeff at 100% with the same officer/director/shareholder roles and the 200 W. 34th / 505 Old Steese address pattern. high: proves continuity of control and address infrastructure across the period when other Legally Mine/BAM creditor and entity events occur.		CONFIRMED	—
2020-02-11	IRS / McNeff complaint target `IRS-LEVY-MCNEFF-2020` captured as `PLEADING ONLY`; Complaint alleges wage levy/release and PPP certification conflict. medium-high: shows pressure/collections context; fraud inference depends on asset-transfer timing and documents.		ASSERTED	—
2020-02-25	Entity record captured for `LMRA SERVICES, INC.` with status `Active` and identity key `LMRA-SERVICES-INC-11676318-0143`. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 11676318 Detail
2020-06-25	Oregon SOS filing-record PDF references administrative dissolution effective `06/25/2020`. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896
2020-07-20	Daniel McNeff letter states prior BAM owners were carrying the loan and Ammon/Matthew were assigned to full-time BAM management. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		ASSERTED	—
2020-08-05	Matthew McNeff signed Oregon reinstatement-amended filing as secretary for BAM Franchising. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896
2020-08-10	Utah UCC chain 1 confirms Legally Mine pledged 450,000 BAM Franchising shares to John Masek and David Ortiz. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2020-08-10	UCC chain 1 filed with collateral category `BAM stock collateral`. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2020-08-10	UCC filed collateralizing 450,000 BAM Franchising shares. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2020-08-14	Entity record captured for `Legally Mine, Inc.` with status `court-filed exhibit only` and identity key `LEGALLY-MINE-INC-UT-7228976`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2020-08-19	Disclosure statement says BAM agreed to assumption of the franchise agreement and a 12-month extension. medium-high: shows BAM’s franchise relationship and workout posture in the bankruptcy record.		CONFIRMED	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc29 Disclosure Statement for Small Business
2020-08-20	Downloaded TXEB bankruptcy PDF header shows Case 20-40193 Doc 30; preview begins: Case 20-40193 Doc 30 Filed 08/20/20 Entered 08/20/20 15:02:50 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION IN RE: § § Jace & Ace, LLC § Case No. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	Bricks AND Minifigs Canby: Business Renewal (OR 2026-01-05)
2020-09-30	Downloaded TXEB bankruptcy PDF header shows Case 20-40193 Doc 37; preview begins: Case 20-40193 Doc 37 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:59:11 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 18 Case 20-40193 Doc 37 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:59:11 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 18 background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	Jace & Ace, LLC: Bankruptcy Operating Report (2020-08-20)
2020-09-30	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 10950141-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Shielld LLC 10950141 Filing History All Internal
2020-10-01	Individual Klimas converted to Chapter 7 in related bankruptcy; later trustee abandonment of litigation claims preserves context for BAM/Jace creditor distress. medium-high: supports franchisee distress/litigation-claim background; not direct Legally Mine proof.		CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) Motion to Convert
2020-10-09	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Miscellaneous with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History Default
2020-10-20	Downloaded TXEB bankruptcy PDF header shows Case 20-40193 Doc 42; preview begins: Case 20-40193 Doc 42 Filed 10/20/20 Entered 10/20/20 11:00:37 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 20 Case 20-40193 Doc 42 Filed 10/20/20 Entered 10/20/20 11:00:37 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 20 background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2020-10-21	Entity record captured for `BAM FRANCHISING, INC` with status `Inactive` and identity key `BAM-FRANCHISING-INC-11984597-0143`. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Detail
2020-10-21	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Application for Authority to Transact Business with filing number 11984597-0143. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History BAM Franchising INC 11984597 Filing History All Internal
2020-11-05	Trustee abandonment order approved abandonment of litigation claims in related Klima case. medium-high: helps determine whether franchisee claims against BAM were preserved/abandoned; useful only if tied to claim substance.		CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc87 Order Approving Abandonment of Litigation Claims
2021-01-04	Downloaded TXEB bankruptcy PDF header shows Case 20-40193 Doc 46; preview begins: Case 20-40193 Doc 46 Filed 01/04/21 Entered 01/04/21 14:12:02 Document Page 1 of 1 EOD Desc Main 01/04/2021 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION In re: § § JACE & ACE, background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	Plastic Palette LLC: UCC Initial Filing (2022-12-09)
2021-01-22	McNeff complaint alleges Dan refused to cede BAM payment decision authority and that nonpayment led to seller repossession and over-$1M asset loss. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		ASSERTED	—
2021-01-22	D. Utah family-control complaint filed; allegations remain asserted unless supported by arbitration award. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		ASSERTED
2021-01-28	Downloaded TXEB bankruptcy PDF header shows Case 20-40193 Doc 47; preview begins: Case 20-40193 Doc 47 Filed 01/28/21 Entered 01/28/21 17:21:00 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3 Case 20-40193 Doc 47 Filed 01/28/21 Entered 01/28/21 17:21:00 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 3 4th Quarter 2020; ended 12/31/2020 background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2021-01-28	Downloaded TXEB bankruptcy PDF header shows Case 20-40193 Doc 48; preview begins: Case 20-40193 Doc 48 Filed 01/28/21 Entered 01/28/21 17:22:06 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3 Case 20-40193 Doc 48 Filed 01/28/21 Entered 01/28/21 17:22:06 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 3 Quarter from 1/1/2021 - 1/3/2/21. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	—
2021-02-11	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 7228976-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History Default
2021-02-12	Utah UCC chain 2 pledges 21% Legally Mine membership and business assets as security for settlement/promissory note valued at $1.728M. high: direct family/member collateral lead; next proof is the settlement/promissory note and operating agreement.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2021-02-12	UCC chain 2 filed with collateral category `membership interest / settlement-note collateral`. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2021-02-12	UCC filed against Daniel McNeff and Legally Mine tied to membership interest and settlement/promissory note collateral. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2021-06-14	Entity record captured for `DDL INVESTMENTS, LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `DDL-INVESTMENTS-LLC-12343181-0160`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 12343181 Detail
2021-08-25	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 10950141-0160. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Shielld LLC 10950141 Filing History All Internal
2021-08-27	UCC chain 4 filed with collateral category `future receivables sale / MCA-style financing`. medium-high: shows pressure/collections context; fraud inference depends on asset-transfer timing and documents.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2021-08-27	UCC chain 5 filed with collateral category `future receivables sale / MCA-style financing`. medium-high: shows pressure/collections context; fraud inference depends on asset-transfer timing and documents.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2022-10-12	Legally Mine-branded video teaches Alaska holding-company / charging-order / non-prorata / revenge-clause strategy; mechanism evidence, not transaction proof. medium-high: shows asset-protection method/theory, but needs transaction-specific bridge docs.		CONFIRMED	—
2022-10-12	Preserved YouTube package identifies Legally Mine Asset Protect & Tax Reduction (Gold), upload date 2022-10-12, video-internal presenter as Dan McNeff, and Alaska/charging-order/non-prorata/revenge-clause content. medium-high: mechanism evidence showing what the product teaches; requires transaction documents to prove use in a specific fraud.		METADATA
2022-12-01	Legal Elf ownership endpoint changed from Daniel/Evelyn 50/50 in 2020 reporting to Evelyn McNeff 100% in the 2022 biennial report; Daniel appears as Previous Member in show-former capture. high: relevant ownership-transfer bracket for testing whether family-entity ownership shifted around litigation/creditor pressure.		CONFIRMED	—
2023-06-26	Separate Utah UCC packet for BAM Franchising shows JPMorgan lien on BAM operating collateral. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	—
2023-06-26	UCC chain BAM-1 filed with collateral category `BAM operating-assets lien`. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	—
2023-06-26	BAM Franchising UCC with JPMorgan Chase filed. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED
2023-07-05	RDAP registration date for the Bricks by the Box domain-route lead. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2023-08-23	Entity record captured for `TEAM DENTISTRY, LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `TEAM-DENTISTRY-LLC-13558625-0160`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Detail
2023-10-11	BAM 2026 FDD says BAM is a Delaware corporation formed 10/11/2023 and completed Delaware survivor merger 04/18/2024; official Delaware proof remains a gap. medium-high: important ownership/provenance guardrail; do not treat Delaware survivor status as official proof until Delaware records are pulled.		ASSERTED	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026
2023-11-10	Ohio board report says OSBA complaint filed 11/10/2023; record includes admissions/consent around Legally Mine/McNeff unauthorized practice of law conduct. high: direct legality/credibility anchor for asset-protection sales and legal-document practices.		ADMITTED	—
2023-11-15	RDAP registration date for the BAM Good Bricks storefront domain. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2023-12-01	USPTO response text represents BAM GOOD BRICKS first use and first use in commerce as at least as early as 2023-12-01. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453
2024-02-29	BAM Products filed `BAM GOOD BRICKS` application. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		CONFIRMED
2024-04-18	2026 FDD asserts Delaware survivor merger completion. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2024-05-01	Utah UCC evidence confirms 450,000 BAM Franchising shares are used as collateral in the creditor-pressure layer. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	—
2024-10-30	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 241030048817B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History BTJD Corporate Services LLC 5746616 Filing History All Internal
2025-01-01	Texas Comptroller officer-source row lists `BRIAN MAYES` as a `2025` officer for `BAM PRODUCTS, INC.`; the same detail excerpt lists him as registered agent. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		UNRESOLVED	—
2025-01-03	UCC chain 9 filed with collateral category `affiliate/cross-debtor receivables/all-assets lien`. medium-high: shows pressure/collections context; fraud inference depends on asset-transfer timing and documents.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2025-01-09	Ohio UPL matter docketed/submitted board materials. high: regulatory finding against Legally Mine/McNeff bears directly on legality and credibility.		CONFIRMED
2025-02-20	Final Ohio UPL order enjoined Legally Mine and Daniel McNeff and imposed civil penalty. high: regulatory finding against Legally Mine/McNeff bears directly on legality and credibility.		ADJUDICATED
2025-02-20	Ohio UPL order/consent-decree finding is a direct legality/credibility anchor for Legally Mine/McNeff conduct. high: regulatory finding against Legally Mine/McNeff bears directly on legality and credibility.		CONFIRMED	—
2025-02-21	Castle complaint alleges future-receivables purchase, ACH remittance, guaranty, blocked/remittance failure, $55,428.66 balance; Utah UCC independently shows Castle secured-party bridge. medium-high: creditor-pressure lead with UCC bridge; needs underlying agreement and payment/default records for fraud theory.		ASSERTED	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint
2025-03-10	Swiss future-receivables agreement date in Connecticut complaint package. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		ASSERTED
2025-03-10	Swiss Fund Connecticut complaint packet alleges merchant/future-receivables agreement, McNeff guaranty, cross-collateral/UCC security interest, later default and withdrawal. medium-high: strong creditor-pressure and cross-collateral lead; fraud inference depends on exhibits and payment/transfer timing.		ASSERTED	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc
2025-03-24	UCC chain 12 filed with collateral category `receivables/general intangibles lien`. medium-high: shows pressure/collections context; fraud inference depends on asset-transfer timing and documents.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2025-04-01	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 250401294299B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2025-04-03	DIB complaint alleges $300,000 purchase price for $480,000 future receipts, 18% remittance, guaranty, blocked/impeded ACH, and $501,250 damages. medium-high: high-value creditor-pressure file because exhibits include Article 9/UCC language and settlement preserving remedies.		ASSERTED	Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint
2025-04-07	Swiss Fund filed Connecticut collection action. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED
2025-05-06	Minnesota CARDS lists 2025 franchise-registration filing rows for file number `9006` submitted `05/06/2025`. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2025-06-20	UCC chain 13 filed with collateral category `future receipts sale / unknown represented creditor`. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2025-06-20	Utah UCC chain 13 records Future Receipts sold by Legally Mine, sale-not-loan language, and transfer/security-interest restrictions impairing collection. high: concrete UCC priority/anti-transfer language that may matter if assets or receivables were later moved/pledged.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
2025-06-25	CARDS public index shows public date `06/25/2025` for the BAM `Order of Renewed Registration w Amendment` row. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2025-06-25	CARDS index shows public date for 2025 renewal packet including order, clean FDD, and marked FDD rows. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2025-06-25	Filed TTAB Opposition No. `91299939` against BAM Products' `BAM GOOD BRICKS` application serial `98426865`. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 001 Filed and Fee
2025-07-15	Swiss Connecticut action withdrawn. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED
2025-07-16	Utah entity map already has BAM IP Holdings LLC as a 2025 Utah entity; this assignment-control pass found no public assignment bridge to sampled BAM/Bricks marks. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2025-07-16	Utah registry capture confirms BAM IP Holdings LLC formation; relationship to BAM marks/IP portfolio not proven by local assignment records. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail
2025-07-16	Entity record captured for `BAM IP Holdings, LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `BAM-IP-HOLDINGS-LLC-14592179-0160`. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail
2025-07-16	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Certificate of Organization with filing number 250718464196B. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History BAM IP Holdings LLC 14333873 Filing History All Internal
2025-07-16	BAM IP Holdings filed/active with Ammon and Matthew managers. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED
2025-07-29	RDAP registration date for the bamfranchising.com domain now redirecting to the Bricks & Minifigs franchise site. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2025-08-05	Filed motion for default judgment after the answer deadline passed in Opposition No. `91299939`. medium-high: shows pressure/collections context; fraud inference depends on asset-transfer timing and documents.		UNRESOLVED	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition Motion for Default
2025-09-09	TTAB sustained BAM Franchising opposition; BAM GOOD BRICKS application abandoned after inter partes decision. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		ADJUDICATED
2025-09-09	Cross-lane TTAB event: opposition between BAM Franchising and BAM Products terminated with refusal/abandonment of BAM Products' BAM GOOD BRICKS application. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2025-09-09	Granted default judgment, sustained opposition, refused registration to BAM Products, and the current TTABVUE page shows termination/application abandonment after inter partes decision. medium-high: shows pressure/collections context; fraud inference depends on asset-transfer timing and documents.		UNRESOLVED	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition TTAB Decision (opp. Sustained)
2025-09-30	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 250930584354B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Shielld LLC 10950141 Filing History All Internal
2025-10-20	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 251020611161B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History BTJD Corporate Services LLC 5746616 Filing History All Internal
2025-12-02	Issued registration `8046031` for BAM Franchising's standard-character `BAM` mark. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901
2025-12-02	USPTO registered BAM mark to BAM Franchising, Inc. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		CONFIRMED	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901
2026-01-20	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Annual Report with filing number 260120772869B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2026-04-06	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Certificate of Organization with filing number 260407922957B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 14421835 Filing History All Internal
2026-04-15	Wisconsin registration detail shows a 2026 effective/uploaded registration while listing organization state as Oregon. high: regulatory finding against Legally Mine/McNeff bears directly on legality and credibility.		UNRESOLVED	Franchise Reg: WI Dfi BAM Franchising Registration Detail
2026-04-15	Wisconsin registration detail shows BAM Franchising / Bricks & Minifigs registered/effective. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		CONFIRMED	Franchise Reg: WI Dfi BAM Franchising Registration Detail
2026-04-24	Wize Grizzly initial report lists Daniel McNeff as 100% Member; Wize Grizzly formed days earlier with LMRA as registered agent. high: shows a new 2026 Daniel-owned Alaska entity in the same LMRA infrastructure after earlier Legal Elf/Legal Bear events.		CONFIRMED	Wize Grizzly, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2026-04-24)
2026-05-05	Kerala House 101 and Kerala House 102 form a layered Alaska LLC/limited-partnership structure using LMRA; Kerala 101 is general partner of Kerala 102. McNeff ownership is not proven. medium-high: illustrates the exact layered structure type the Alaska strategy predicts, but should be treated as client/infrastructure evidence unless tied to McNeff ownership or BAM/Legally Mine assets.		CONFIRMED	Kerala House 101, LLC: Articles of Organization (2026-05-04)
2026-05-21	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Amendment to Certificate of Organization with filing number 2605221009625B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal
2026-05-29	Entity record captured for `BTJD Corporate Services, LLC` with status `role confirmed; own packet missing` and identity key `BTJD-CORPORATE-SERVICES-UT-NEEDS-PACKET`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail
2026-05-29	Entity record captured for `Centra Wealth Solutions, LLC` with status `role confirmed; own packet missing` and identity key `CENTRA-WEALTH-SOLUTIONS-UT-NEEDS-PACKET`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail
2026-05-29	Entity record captured for `LEGALLY MINE LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `LEGALLY-MINE-LLC-14701446-0151`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail
2026-05-29	Entity record captured for `LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC` with status `Active` and identity key `LEGALLY-MINE-TAX-AND-ACCOUNTING-LLC-14701452-0151`. medium: identity-key/name-history row; useful for obfuscation map but weak alone.		CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 14441864 Detail
2026-05-29	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Registration Information Change Form with filing number 2606011024876B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 14421835 Filing History All Internal
2026-05-29	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Certificate of Assumed and of True Name with filing number 2606031031140B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Legally Mine 2026 Entity 14441858 Filing History All Internal
2026-05-29	Official Utah BES filing-history index lists Certificate of Assumed and of True Name with filing number 2606031031189B. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		UNRESOLVED	Utah Registry: Filing History Legally Mine Tax and Accounting 2026 Entity 14441864 Filing History All Int
2026-05-29	Centra registered assumed names `LEGALLY MINE LLC` and `LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC`; these are tracked as separate DBA nodes from the old operating entities. background: useful for chronology/provenance, weak on merits standing alone.		CONFIRMED
2026-06-02	Official Utah UCC searches captured Legally Mine and BAM Franchising UCC chains; Daniel J. McNeff direct UCC search remained blocked by login/order flow. high: connects BAM/franchise assets or McNeff/Legally Mine collateral to debt, liens, or alleged repossession.		CONFIRMED
2026-06-15	Current public name and Texas SOS file-number searches each returned one `BAM PRODUCTS, INC.` match. medium: maps BAM governance/franchise context; needs link to McNeff/Legally Mine obligations.		UNRESOLVED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska bulk officials data lists Daniel J. McNeff on LMRA Services, Inc. (10045051) as: Director, President, Secretary, Shareholder, Treasurer high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska bulk officials data lists Daniel J. McNeff on Legal Bear, LLC (10055588) as: Member high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska Agents search for LMRA showed page 1 of 101 and a 2,000-result cap; partial capture contains 20 historical/previous registered-agent rows before site maintenance interrupted collection. medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska officials bulk data contains 5,299 rows where LMRA Services, Inc. is registered agent; pattern includes 1,338 Management, 964 Asset, 387 Safe, and 1,624 Limited Partnership names. high: proves scale of Alaska agent/entity infrastructure; requires bridge docs to prove misuse.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search for MCNEFF captured 125 rows across 7 pages, including 111 rows for Mariah McNeff as Previous Organizer and direct Daniel/Evelyn rows for LMRA/Legal Bear/Legal Elf/Wize Grizzly. high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Daniel as Member for Wize Grizzly, LLC (10360899). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Daniel as Previous Member for Legal Elf, LLC (10069745). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Daniel J. as Director for LMRA Services, Inc. (10045051). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Daniel J. as Member for Legal Bear, LLC (10055588). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Daniel J. as President for LMRA Services, Inc. (10045051). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Daniel J. as Secretary for LMRA Services, Inc. (10045051). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Daniel J. as Shareholder for LMRA Services, Inc. (10045051). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Daniel J. as Treasurer for LMRA Services, Inc. (10045051). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Evelyn as Member for Legal Elf, LLC (10069745). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska historical Officials search lists McNeff, Evelyn F. as Previous Member for Legal Bear, LLC (10055588). high: ties McNeff actors to Alaska entity/agent infrastructure matching the asset-protection theory.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska bulk officials data lists Nalin Patel on Legally Enlighten, LLC (10121284) as: Member medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	—
2026-06-16	Official Alaska bulk officials data lists Rekha Patel on Legally Enlighten, LLC (10121284) as: Member medium: maps infrastructure; not proof of misuse without client/asset-transfer bridge.		CONFIRMED	—

The playersThe cast, every entity & person

Everyone and everything in the record, grouped. The enterprise operates through dozens of entities across at least six states; filter or search to navigate the full list.

Name	Cluster	Role / significance	Grade	Documents held
Big Blue Bungalow LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	Legal Elf LLC member of; Castle Funding v. Legally Mine, 158140/2025 service roster includes	CONFIRMED	—
Daniel J. McNeff	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	Legal Bear LLC tied to principal; Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC tied to principal; Procure LLC tied to principal; SHIELLD LLC tied to principal	ADJUDICATED	public record ↗
DDL Investments LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	Daniel J. McNeff member/officer of; Castle Funding v. Legally Mine, 158140/2025 service roster includes	CONFIRMED	—
Legal Bear LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	co-defendant with Legally Mine old operating entity; cross-collateral affiliate of Legally Mine old operating entity; tied to principal Daniel J. McNeff; Daniel J. McNeff member/officer of	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legal Elf LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	member of Big Blue Bungalow LLC	CONFIRMED	—
Legally Mine old operating entity	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	Legal Bear LLC co-defendant with; Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC co-defendant with; Procure LLC co-defendant with; Shield LLC co-defendant with	ADJUDICATED	—
Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	co-defendant with Legally Mine old operating entity; cross-collateral affiliate of Legally Mine old operating entity; tied to principal Daniel J. McNeff; appears as UCC chain-9 related debtor with Legally Mine old operating entity	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 14441864 Detail
LegalProcessThree, LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	A McNeff legal-process-named shell (#8132151; dissolved 2011).	CORROBORATED	public record ↗
LM OLDCO LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	Legally Mine old operating entity reported name-change to	CONFIRMED	— —
LMRA mill: ~11,500 agented entities	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	LMRA Services is the registered agent of record for roughly 5,300 Alaska and 6,200 Utah entities.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	registered agent/back-office for Legally Mine old operating entity; uses business address 1337 E 750 N, Orem, UT	CONFIRMED	public record ↗
LMTA OLDCO LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	The renamed husk of Legally Mine Tax & Accounting (#11646910, Active/Delinquent), the same OLDCO maneuver applied to the tax arm.	CONFIRMED	public record ↗
Medisource Marketing LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	Daniel J. McNeff member/officer of; Castle Funding v. Legally Mine, 158140/2025 service roster includes	CONFIRMED	—
NFM Marketing, LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	A new McNeff entity (#14633312) formed 11/22/2025, a fresh marketing vehicle.	CORROBORATED	public record ↗
Procure LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	co-defendant with Legally Mine old operating entity; cross-collateral affiliate of Legally Mine old operating entity; tied to principal Daniel J. McNeff; Daniel J. McNeff member/officer of	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Protect Yourself, LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	A McNeff asset-protection-named shell (#9015464; dissolved 2014).	CORROBORATED	public record ↗
Shield LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	co-defendant with Legally Mine old operating entity	CONFIRMED	—
SHIELLD LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	cross-collateral affiliate of Legally Mine old operating entity; tied to principal Daniel J. McNeff; appears as UCC chain-9 related debtor with Legally Mine old operating entity	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc
Team Dentistry LLC	McNeff & Legally Mine cluster	co-defendant with Legally Mine old operating entity; cross-collateral affiliate of Legally Mine old operating entity; tied to principal Daniel J. McNeff; Daniel J. McNeff member/officer of	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Ammon McNeff	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	BAM IP Holdings LLC managed by; Legally Mine old operating entity pledged membership/note collateral to; BAM Franchising Inc. associated seller	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C414 FDD
BAM Franchising Inc.	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	debtor in UCC with secured party JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA; Legally Mine old operating entity UCC collateral includes; UCC secured party JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA; uses address 225 W 520 N, Orem, UT	CONFIRMED	—
BAM IP Holdings LLC	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	managed by Ammon McNeff; managed by Matthew McNeff; uses business address 4844 N 300 W, Provo, UT	CONFIRMED	—
BAMF Orem 1 LLC	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	An Ammon McNeff entity (#14522452; manager/organizer Ammon McNeff; dissolved 12/2/2024) tied to the BAMF-Orem reacquisition.	CONFIRMED	—
Bricks & Minifigs	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	BAM Franchising Inc. franchisor/brand system	CONFIRMED	Franchise Reg: WI Dfi BAM Franchising Registration Detail Franchise Reg: MN Cards E1722ECD Order Registration
Bricks and Minifigs Holdings LLC	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	BAM Franchising Inc. FDD affiliate	CONFIRMED	—
Bricks by the Box (DBA)	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	An Ammon McNeff LEGO-resale assumed name (#13447061; cancelled).	CONFIRMED	—
David Ortiz	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	Legally Mine old operating entity pledged BAM shares to	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C414 FDD
FDD self-contradiction: parent	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	BAM's FDD contradicts itself on whether it has a parent at all.	ADMITTED	—
John Masek	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	Legally Mine old operating entity pledged BAM shares to	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	BAM Franchising Inc. debtor in UCC with secured party; BAM Franchising Inc. UCC secured party	CONFIRMED	—
Kragle LLC	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	An Orem BAM franchisee co-owned by Ammon + Matthew McNeff since 2017; the $140k BAMF-Orem reacquisition note ran to it.	CONFIRMED	—
Matthew McNeff	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	BAM IP Holdings LLC managed by; Legally Mine old operating entity pledged membership/note collateral to; BAM Franchising Inc. associated seller	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C414 FDD
Reed Brimhall	Bricks & Minifigs (BAM)	BAM Franchising Inc. associated seller	CONFIRMED	FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C414 FDD
BTJD Corporate Services LLC	Brand handoff	registered agent for LEGALLY MINE LLC 2026 DBA; registered agent for LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC 2026 DBA	CONFIRMED	public record ↗
Centra Wealth Solutions LLC	Brand handoff	owns assumed name LEGALLY MINE LLC 2026 DBA; owns assumed name LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC 2026 DBA; Mark Comer manager of; David Johnston manager of	CONFIRMED	public record ↗
David Johnston	Brand handoff	manager of Centra Wealth Solutions LLC	CONFIRMED	—
LEGALLY MINE LLC 2026 DBA	Brand handoff	Centra Wealth Solutions LLC owns assumed name; BTJD Corporate Services LLC registered agent for	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail
LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC 2026 DBA	Brand handoff	Centra Wealth Solutions LLC owns assumed name; BTJD Corporate Services LLC registered agent for	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 14441864 Detail
Mark Comer	Brand handoff	manager of Centra Wealth Solutions LLC	CONFIRMED	—
American Fork PD / Judge Griffin	Salem takeover & the critic	Search warrant #3352981 (Judge Roger W. Griffin; affiant Officer Cole Richardson); released a selectively redacted bodycam; the 'scare him a little bit and let him go' stop.	CONFIRMED	—
Baker Salem / Baker Bricks LLC	Salem takeover & the critic	The 'bona fide acquisition' successor operator (Best + Johnson).	CONFIRMED	—
Brandon Best	Salem takeover & the critic	BAM's contracted repossession inventory inspector who then acquired the store he inspected; presented as the Salem/Eugene owner; RICO co-plaintiff.	CONFIRMED	—
Bryan Mansell	Salem takeover & the critic	Consigned his father's Star Wars LEGO collection to the Salem store (11/22/2023); swears it was swept into the takeover and kept being sold; a RICO co-defendant.	CONFIRMED	—
Josh Johnson	Salem takeover & the critic	BAM Franchise Development Recruiter (since May 2023) + Fortune Law EVP + Legally Mine Event Booking Director; Baker Salem co-owner; RICO co-plaintiff.	CONFIRMED	—
The Gormans (Chrystal Law / Benjamin Gorman)	Salem takeover & the critic	The Salem/Keizer franchisees BAM terminated and repossessed ($97,393.70 demand); now suing BAM in Oregon.	ASSERTED	—
Victor Nguyen	Salem takeover & the critic	Named with Schneider, Reckless Ben LLC and Mansell on BAM's RICO defendant roster.	CONFIRMED	—
“Reckless Ben” (Benjamin Schneider)	Salem takeover & the critic	The LEGO-channel critic who documented the missing collection; RICO/TRO defendant; arrested on a warrant that seized nothing.	CONFIRMED	—
Art McOmber / Fortress	Asset-protection industry	Ex-FBI; on the Fortune Law roster; principal of the Las Vegas Fortress Management (not the same-name Alaska entity).	CORROBORATED	—
Fortune Law Firm (Las Vegas)	Asset-protection industry	Asset-protection/estate firm; Josh Johnson is listed as EVP and on its presenter roster with Art McOmber.	CORROBORATED	—
Guardian Law LLC (Orem)	Asset-protection industry	A parallel Mitton-lineage AP mill. NOT McNeff-owned.	CORROBORATED	—
Jay Mitton	Asset-protection industry	The asset-protection-seminar pioneer; the lineage source for several Orem AP mills.	CORROBORATED	—
National Foundation for Asset Protection (NFAP)	Asset-protection industry	The Mitton → McNeff brand bridge into Legally Mine.	CORROBORATED	—
Veil Corporate LLC (Orem)	Asset-protection industry	A parallel Mitton-lineage asset-protection mill; a defendant in the private Wilson v. BuyPD fraud suit. NOT McNeff-owned.	CORROBORATED	—
Zachariah Parry	Asset-protection industry	Owner of Fortune Law Firm.	CORROBORATED	—
Castle Funding Corp.	Creditors	Legally Mine old operating entity UCC secured party	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
DIB Capital Inc.	Creditors		UNRESOLVED	—
FAVO	Creditors	Legally Mine old operating entity UCC includes future-receivables transactions with	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Swiss Fund LLC	Creditors	Legally Mine old operating entity seller/merchant in MCA with	ASSERTED	—
Castle Funding v. Legally Mine, 158140/2025	Courts & agencies	service roster includes DDL Investments LLC; service roster includes Medisource Marketing LLC; service roster includes Big Blue Bungalow LLC; service roster includes Daniel J. McNeff	METADATA	public record ↗
Eliasieh I, 3:18-cv-03622	Courts & agencies	names defendant Legally Mine old operating entity; has unavailable defense declaration Legally Mine old operating entity	CONFIRMED	public record ↗
FTC v. iMall (Comer, 1999 stipulated judgment)	Courts & agencies	A 1999 FTC stipulated final judgment and permanent injunction against iMall, Craig R. Pickering, and a Mark R. Comer.	ADMITTED	public record ↗
Jace & Ace LLC, 20-40193	Courts & agencies	matrix/notice recipient includes BAM Franchising Inc.; top-20 unsecured claims state Jace top-20 unsecured claims: none; Klima, 20-40192 affiliate/managing-members relationship with; Klima, 20-40192 companion case to	CONFIRMED	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc1 Pacermonitor Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition
Ohio State Bar v. Legally Mine, 2025-0037	Courts & agencies	resulted in injunction against Legally Mine old operating entity; resulted in injunction against Daniel J. McNeff; imposed civil penalty Legally Mine old operating entity	ADJUDICATED	public record ↗
Peterson v. Legally Mine, 19-01004	Courts & agencies	names defendant/judgment debtor Legally Mine old operating entity	CONFIRMED	public record ↗
Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine, FST-CV-25-6072810-S	Courts & agencies	filed in Connecticut Superior Court; Glenn Francis Russell Jr. appeared for defendants in	CONFIRMED	public record ↗
TTAB 91299939	Courts & agencies	BAM Franchising Inc. opposed application in; sustained opposition for BAM Franchising Inc.	ADJUDICATED	—
1337 E 750 N, Orem, UT	other / infrastructure	Legally Mine old operating entity uses business address; LMRA Services Inc uses business address	CONFIRMED	—
225 W 520 N, Orem, UT	other / infrastructure	BAM Franchising Inc. uses address	CONFIRMED	—
4844 N 300 W, Provo, UT	other / infrastructure	BAM IP Holdings LLC uses business address	CONFIRMED	—
5255 W 11000 N Ste 250, Highland, UT	other / infrastructure	Centra Wealth Solutions LLC uses business address	CONFIRMED	—
Andrea Klima	other / infrastructure	joint debtor in Klima, 20-40192	CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition
BAM	other / infrastructure	BAM Franchising Inc. owns registered mark	ADJUDICATED	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901 Utah UCC: Detail TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 001 Filed and Fee USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Application APP20240229170757 USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453
BAM GOOD BRICKS	other / infrastructure	BAM Products Inc. applied for mark	ADJUDICATED	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 001 Filed and Fee USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453 TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition TTAB Decision (opp. Sustained)
BAM Products Inc.	other / infrastructure	applied for mark BAM GOOD BRICKS; registered agent/officer Brian Mayes	CONFIRMED	Texas Comptroller: TX Comptroller BAM Products 32002130931
BB&T	other / infrastructure		UNRESOLVED	—
Brian Mayes	other / infrastructure	BAM Products Inc. registered agent/officer	CONFIRMED	Texas Comptroller: TX Comptroller BAM Products 32002130931 USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Application APP20240229170757
C T Corporation System	other / infrastructure	Legally Mine old operating entity UCC representative secured party	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Connecticut Superior Court	other / infrastructure	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine, FST-CV-25-6072810-S filed in	CONFIRMED	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc
Corporation Service Company	other / infrastructure	Legally Mine old operating entity UCC representative secured party	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Daniel McNeff residence (redacted)	other / infrastructure	Daniel J. McNeff has residence	CORROBORATED	—
DIB Capital v. Legally Mine, 516236/2025	other / infrastructure		UNRESOLVED	—
Eliasieh II, 3:19-cv-05977	other / infrastructure	names defendant Legally Mine old operating entity	CONFIRMED	—
Glenn Francis Russell Jr.	other / infrastructure	appeared for defendants in Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine, FST-CV-25-6072810-S	CONFIRMED	—
Jace top-20 unsecured claims: none	other / infrastructure	Jace & Ace LLC, 20-40193 top-20 unsecured claims state	CONFIRMED	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc1 Pacermonitor
Jason Klima	other / infrastructure	joint debtor in Klima, 20-40192	CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition
John S. Peterson	other / infrastructure	judgment creditor/trustee in satisfaction against Legally Mine old operating entity	CONFIRMED	—
Klima, 20-40192	other / infrastructure	affiliate/managing-members relationship with Jace & Ace LLC, 20-40193; matrix/notice recipient includes BAM Franchising Inc.; Jason Klima joint debtor in; Andrea Klima joint debtor in	CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition
Ohio State Bar Association	other / infrastructure	brought UPL matter against Legally Mine old operating entity; brought UPL matter against Daniel J. McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
Ohio Supreme Court	other / infrastructure		ADJUDICATED	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board	other / infrastructure		CONFIRMED	—
USPTO	other / infrastructure		CONFIRMED	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901

The connections, in fullEvery relationship, with the why and the citation

All 143 documented relationships behind the map, each with what it is, why it matters, its grade, and its source. This is the evidentiary backbone of every line in Figure 1.

From → To	Relationship	Why it matters	Grade	Source
Legal Bear LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	co-defendant with	Swiss official docket identifies all as defendants in the same Connecticut case	CONFIRMED
Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	co-defendant with	Swiss official docket identifies all as defendants in the same Connecticut case	CONFIRMED
Procure LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	co-defendant with	Swiss official docket identifies all as defendants in the same Connecticut case	CONFIRMED
Shield LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	co-defendant with	Swiss official docket identifies all as defendants in the same Connecticut case	CONFIRMED
Team Dentistry LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	co-defendant with	Swiss official docket identifies all as defendants in the same Connecticut case	CONFIRMED
Legal Bear LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	cross-collateral affiliate of	Swiss complaint says these affiliates are listed in the agreement package and tied to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
Legal Bear LLC → Daniel J. McNeff	tied to principal	Swiss OCR ties cross-collateral affiliates to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	cross-collateral affiliate of	Swiss complaint says these affiliates are listed in the agreement package and tied to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC → Daniel J. McNeff	tied to principal	Swiss OCR ties cross-collateral affiliates to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
Procure LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	cross-collateral affiliate of	Swiss complaint says these affiliates are listed in the agreement package and tied to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
Procure LLC → Daniel J. McNeff	tied to principal	Swiss OCR ties cross-collateral affiliates to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
SHIELLD LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	cross-collateral affiliate of	Swiss complaint says these affiliates are listed in the agreement package and tied to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
SHIELLD LLC → Daniel J. McNeff	tied to principal	Swiss OCR ties cross-collateral affiliates to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
Team Dentistry LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	cross-collateral affiliate of	Swiss complaint says these affiliates are listed in the agreement package and tied to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
Team Dentistry LLC → Daniel J. McNeff	tied to principal	Swiss OCR ties cross-collateral affiliates to Daniel Jay McNeff	CORROBORATED
Daniel J. McNeff → Legally Mine old operating entity	signatory/guarantor for	Swiss complaint package identifies Daniel as signatory/guarantor	CORROBORATED
Legally Mine old operating entity → Swiss Fund LLC	seller/merchant in MCA with	Swiss complaint pleads a future-receivables agreement. complaint	ASSERTED
Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine, FST-CV-25-6072810-S → Connecticut Superior Court	filed in	Official Connecticut case lookup	CONFIRMED
Glenn Francis Russell Jr. → Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine, FST-CV-25-6072810-S	appeared for defendants in	Official Connecticut docket lists defense appearance	CONFIRMED
Centra Wealth Solutions LLC → LEGALLY MINE LLC 2026 DBA	owns assumed name	Official BES shows 2026 LEGALLY MINE LLC assumed-name record with owner Centra; this is a separate node from the old operating entity	CONFIRMED
Centra Wealth Solutions LLC → LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC 2026 DBA	owns assumed name	Official BES shows 2026 LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC assumed-name record with owner Centra; this is a separate node from the old entity	CONFIRMED
BTJD Corporate Services LLC → LEGALLY MINE LLC 2026 DBA	registered agent for	Official BES shows BTJD as registered agent for Centra-owned assumed names	CONFIRMED
BTJD Corporate Services LLC → LEGALLY MINE TAX AND ACCOUNTING LLC 2026 DBA	registered agent for	Official BES shows BTJD as registered agent for Centra-owned assumed names	CONFIRMED
Mark Comer → Centra Wealth Solutions LLC	manager of	The Utah registry records Utah registry manager field	CONFIRMED
David Johnston → Centra Wealth Solutions LLC	manager of	The Utah registry records Utah registry manager field	CONFIRMED
LMRA Services Inc → Legally Mine old operating entity	registered agent/back-office for	the Utah registry identifies LMRA Services and Orem address	CONFIRMED
Legally Mine old operating entity → LM OLDCO LLC	renamed to (husk)	Official Utah registry name history for entity #7228976: ASSET PROTECTION LEADER LLC → LEGALLY MINE INC → LEGALLY MINE LLC → LM OLDCO LLC (renamed 5/22/2026, filing 2605221009625B), same registration, name changed; the litigated firm left behind as a husk.	CONFIRMED	—
Daniel J. McNeff → Legal Bear LLC	member/officer of	Official Utah BES capture ties Daniel McNeff to Legal Bear	CONFIRMED
Daniel J. McNeff → Procure LLC	member/officer of	Official Utah BES capture ties Daniel McNeff to Procure	CONFIRMED
Daniel J. McNeff → Team Dentistry LLC	member/officer of	Official Utah BES capture ties Daniel McNeff to Team Dentistry	CONFIRMED
Daniel J. McNeff → DDL Investments LLC	member/officer of	Official Utah BES capture ties Daniel McNeff to active DDL Investments	CONFIRMED
Daniel J. McNeff → Medisource Marketing LLC	member/officer of	Official Utah BES capture ties Daniel McNeff to Medisource Marketing	CONFIRMED
Legal Elf LLC → Big Blue Bungalow LLC	member of	Official Utah BES capture identifies Legal Elf as member of Big Blue Bungalow	CONFIRMED
BAM IP Holdings LLC → Ammon McNeff	managed by	Official BES shows managers Ammon and Mathew/Matthew McNeff	CONFIRMED
BAM IP Holdings LLC → Matthew McNeff	managed by	Official BES shows managers Ammon and Mathew/Matthew McNeff	CONFIRMED
BAM Franchising Inc. → JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA	debtor in UCC with secured party	Official UCC export for BAM Franchising	CONFIRMED
Legally Mine old operating entity → BAM Franchising Inc.	UCC collateral includes	Legally Mine UCC detail includes BAM Franchising stock collateral	CONFIRMED
Legally Mine old operating entity → FAVO	UCC includes future-receivables transactions with	Legally Mine UCC detail includes FAVO future-receivables transactions	CONFIRMED
Legally Mine old operating entity → John Masek	pledged BAM shares to	UCC chain 1 secured party for 450,000 BAM Franchising shares	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legally Mine old operating entity → David Ortiz	pledged BAM shares to	UCC chain 1 secured party for 450,000 BAM Franchising shares	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legally Mine old operating entity → Ammon McNeff	pledged membership/note collateral to	UCC chain 2 identifies Ammon McNeff as secured party	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legally Mine old operating entity → Matthew McNeff	pledged membership/note collateral to	UCC chain 2 identifies Matthew McNeff as secured party	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legally Mine old operating entity → Castle Funding Corp.	UCC secured party	UCC chain 12 ties Castle to Legally Mine and Daniel Jay McNeff	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legally Mine old operating entity → C T Corporation System	UCC representative secured party	Multiple Legally Mine UCC chains identify C T Corporation System as representative	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legally Mine old operating entity → Corporation Service Company	UCC representative secured party	Legally Mine UCC chain 13 identifies Corporation Service Company as representative	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legal Bear LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	appears as UCC chain-9 related debtor with	Official UCC chain 9 repeats the Swiss-style debtor cluster	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	appears as UCC chain-9 related debtor with	Official UCC chain 9 repeats the Swiss-style debtor cluster	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Procure LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	appears as UCC chain-9 related debtor with	Official UCC chain 9 repeats the Swiss-style debtor cluster	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
SHIELLD LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	appears as UCC chain-9 related debtor with	Official UCC chain 9 repeats the Swiss-style debtor cluster	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
Team Dentistry LLC → Legally Mine old operating entity	appears as UCC chain-9 related debtor with	Official UCC chain 9 repeats the Swiss-style debtor cluster	CONFIRMED	Utah UCC: Detail
BAM Franchising Inc. → JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA	UCC secured party	Official UCC export for BAM Franchising identifies JPMorgan Chase Bank	CONFIRMED	—
Castle Funding v. Legally Mine, 158140/2025 → DDL Investments LLC	service roster includes	Castle docket service entries name DDL Investments	METADATA	—
Castle Funding v. Legally Mine, 158140/2025 → Medisource Marketing LLC	service roster includes	Castle docket service entries name Medisource	METADATA	—
Castle Funding v. Legally Mine, 158140/2025 → Big Blue Bungalow LLC	service roster includes	Castle docket service entries name Big Blue Bungalow	METADATA	—
Castle Funding v. Legally Mine, 158140/2025 → Daniel J. McNeff	service roster includes	Castle docket service entries name Daniel Jay McNeff	METADATA	—
Legally Mine old operating entity → 1337 E 750 N, Orem, UT	uses business address	Orem 1337 address appears in official/contract sources	CORROBORATED
LMRA Services Inc → 1337 E 750 N, Orem, UT	uses business address	the Utah registry	CONFIRMED
BAM Franchising Inc. → 225 W 520 N, Orem, UT	uses address	UCC/TSDR source shows BAM Franchising at 225 W 520 N	CONFIRMED
BAM IP Holdings LLC → 4844 N 300 W, Provo, UT	uses business address	Official BES/FDD source	CONFIRMED
Centra Wealth Solutions LLC → 5255 W 11000 N Ste 250, Highland, UT	uses business address	the Utah registry	CONFIRMED
Daniel J. McNeff → Daniel McNeff residence (redacted)	has residence	Exact home address is held internal and redacted from outward-facing graph	CORROBORATED
Ohio State Bar v. Legally Mine, 2025-0037 → Legally Mine old operating entity	resulted in injunction against	Ohio Supreme Court final order	ADJUDICATED
Ohio State Bar v. Legally Mine, 2025-0037 → Daniel J. McNeff	resulted in injunction against	Ohio Supreme Court final order	ADJUDICATED
Ohio State Bar v. Legally Mine, 2025-0037 → Legally Mine old operating entity	imposed civil penalty	Ohio Supreme Court final order imposed $5,000 civil penalty	ADJUDICATED
Ohio State Bar Association → Legally Mine old operating entity	brought UPL matter against	Ohio UPL docket	CONFIRMED
Ohio State Bar Association → Daniel J. McNeff	brought UPL matter against	Ohio UPL docket	CONFIRMED
Eliasieh I, 3:18-cv-03622 → Legally Mine old operating entity	names defendant	Acquired Bloomberg/CourtListener materials. docket	CONFIRMED
Eliasieh II, 3:19-cv-05977 → Legally Mine old operating entity	names defendant	CourtListener public complaint acquired. docket	CONFIRMED
Eliasieh I, 3:18-cv-03622 → Legally Mine old operating entity	has unavailable defense declaration	CourtListener/Bloomberg metadata confirms Doc. 78/79 family but PDF unavailable	METADATA
Jace & Ace LLC, 20-40193 → BAM Franchising Inc.	matrix/notice recipient includes	Jace petition/matrix proves BAM Franchising as notice/matrix recipient, not claim amount	CONFIRMED	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc1 Pacermonitor
Jace & Ace LLC, 20-40193 → Jace top-20 unsecured claims: none	top-20 unsecured claims state	Jace petition top-20 unsecured list says none	CONFIRMED	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc1 Pacermonitor
Klima, 20-40192 → Jace & Ace LLC, 20-40193	affiliate/managing-members relationship with	Klima petition lists pending Jace & Ace affiliate case and relationship as members/managing members	CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition
Klima, 20-40192 → BAM Franchising Inc.	matrix/notice recipient includes	Klima petition matrix lists BAM Franchising as notice recipient, not claim amount	CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition
Jason Klima → Klima, 20-40192	joint debtor in	Klima petition identifies Jason Klima as debtor	CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition
Andrea Klima → Klima, 20-40192	joint debtor in	Klima petition identifies Andrea Klima as debtor	CONFIRMED	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition
John S. Peterson → Legally Mine old operating entity	judgment creditor/trustee in satisfaction against	Peterson satisfaction says the judgment against Legally Mine was fully satisfied	CONFIRMED	—
Klima, 20-40192 → Jace & Ace LLC, 20-40193	companion case to	Klima petition/docs acquired as companion individual case	CORROBORATED
Peterson v. Legally Mine, 19-01004 → Legally Mine old operating entity	names defendant/judgment debtor	Satisfaction proves judgment debtor and full payment; complaint theory and amount remain unavailable	CONFIRMED	—
BAM Products Inc. → BAM GOOD BRICKS	applied for mark	USPTO/TSDR application. uspto	CONFIRMED
BAM Franchising Inc. → BAM	owns registered mark	USPTO certificate identifies BAM Franchising as owner of registered BAM mark	CONFIRMED	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901
BAM Products Inc. → Brian Mayes	registered agent/officer	Texas Comptroller and USPTO application tie BAM Products to Brian Mayes	CONFIRMED	Texas Comptroller: TX Comptroller BAM Products 32002130931
BAM Franchising Inc. → Bricks & Minifigs	franchisor/brand system	FDD describes BAM Franchising's Bricks & Minifigs franchise system	CORROBORATED	—
BAM Franchising Inc. → TTAB 91299939	opposed application in	TTAB public docket. ttab	CONFIRMED
TTAB 91299939 → BAM Franchising Inc.	sustained opposition for	TTAB decision sustaining opposition	ADJUDICATED
BAM Franchising Inc. → Bricks and Minifigs Holdings LLC	FDD affiliate	Minnesota marked FDD text	CONFIRMED
BAM Franchising Inc. → Ammon McNeff	associated seller	Minnesota FDD receipt lists sellers	CONFIRMED
BAM Franchising Inc. → Matthew McNeff	associated seller	Minnesota FDD receipt lists sellers	CONFIRMED
BAM Franchising Inc. → Reed Brimhall	associated seller	Minnesota FDD receipt lists sellers	CONFIRMED
Josh Johnson → BAM Franchising Inc.	franchise development recruiter (corporate)	BAM's own FDD lists Josh as corporate staff since May 2023, contradicting the public claim that he is an 'independent franchise owner.'	CONFIRMED	—
Josh Johnson → Fortune Law Firm (Las Vegas)	executive VP	Places Josh inside a Las Vegas asset-protection firm shared with Art McOmber.	CORROBORATED
Josh Johnson → Legally Mine old operating entity	event booking director	Ties the 'independent' Salem buyer back into the Legally Mine organization.	CORROBORATED
Josh Johnson → Baker Salem / Baker Bricks LLC	co-owner	One of the two insiders behind the successor that took the seized store.	CONFIRMED	—
Brandon Best → Baker Salem / Baker Bricks LLC	co-owner	The other insider behind the successor.	CONFIRMED	—
Brandon Best → BAM Franchising Inc.	repossession inventory inspector	Best inspected and secured the very store he then 'acquired', the repo inspector became the buyer.	CONFIRMED	—
Baker Salem / Baker Bricks LLC → BAM Franchising Inc.	successor operator (pleaded 'bona fide acquisition')	BAM pleads an arm's-length sale but never filed the agreement, and both buyers are insiders.	CONFIRMED	—
The Gormans (Chrystal Law / Benjamin Gorman) → BAM Franchising Inc.	terminated franchisee / plaintiff	Terminated and repossessed ($97,393.70 demand); now suing BAM, alleging engineered defaults + FDD fraud.	ASSERTED	—
The Gormans (Chrystal Law / Benjamin Gorman) → Baker Salem / Baker Bricks LLC	store transferred to	The Gormans' store passed to the insider successor.	CONFIRMED	—
Bryan Mansell → The Gormans (Chrystal Law / Benjamin Gorman)	consigned collection via	Mansell consigned his father's Star Wars LEGO to the Gorman store on 11/22/2023.	CONFIRMED	—
BAM Franchising Inc. → “Reckless Ben” (Benjamin Schneider)	RICO plaintiff vs (with TRO)	BAM and the McNeff insiders sued the critic under Utah's racketeering statute and obtained a publication-restricting TRO.	ASSERTED	—
Ammon McNeff → “Reckless Ben” (Benjamin Schneider)	co-plaintiff	Ammon McNeff is a named co-plaintiff against the critic.	CONFIRMED
Josh Johnson → “Reckless Ben” (Benjamin Schneider)	co-plaintiff	The 'independent franchisee' is a co-plaintiff sharing BAM's counsel.	CONFIRMED
Brandon Best → “Reckless Ben” (Benjamin Schneider)	co-plaintiff	The repo-inspector-turned-buyer is a co-plaintiff sharing BAM's counsel.	CONFIRMED
Bryan Mansell → “Reckless Ben” (Benjamin Schneider)	co-defendant	Mansell is named with Schneider on the RICO defendant roster.	CONFIRMED
Victor Nguyen → “Reckless Ben” (Benjamin Schneider)	co-defendant	Named with Schneider on the RICO defendant roster.	CONFIRMED
American Fork PD / Judge Griffin → “Reckless Ben” (Benjamin Schneider)	warrant / arrest	Warrant #3352981 (stalking + a LEGO-seizure add-on) returned 'no items seized'; the bodycam was selectively redacted.	CONFIRMED	—
Ammon McNeff → BAM Franchising Inc.	CEO	Runs the franchisor; ex-Legally Mine president.	CONFIRMED	—
Matthew McNeff → BAM Franchising Inc.	COO / Treasurer	Runs the franchisor; ex-Legally Mine VP marketing.	CONFIRMED	—
Ammon McNeff → Kragle LLC	co-owner	BAM's CEO co-owns the franchisee BAM bought back.	CONFIRMED	—
Matthew McNeff → Kragle LLC	co-owner	BAM's COO co-owns the franchisee BAM bought back.	CONFIRMED	—
Kragle LLC → BAM Franchising Inc.	related-party reacquisition ($140k)	BAM bought back a store tied to its own CEO and COO, non-arm's-length self-dealing.	CONFIRMED	—
FDD self-contradiction: parent → BAM Franchising Inc.	parent of (undisclosed)	A parent the FDD never names sits above BAM; a decade-long Item 1 omission.	CONFIRMED	—
Reed Brimhall → FDD self-contradiction: parent	CFO of the parent	Brimhall's own bio names the parent he serves, exposing the omission.	CONFIRMED	—
Jay Mitton → National Foundation for Asset Protection (NFAP)	founded / built	The seminar pioneer's foundation is the brand bridge.	CORROBORATED
National Foundation for Asset Protection (NFAP) → Legally Mine old operating entity	lineage into	Dan McNeff acquired Legally Mine via the NFAP as a Mitton student.	CORROBORATED
Jay Mitton → Veil Corporate LLC (Orem)	lineage only (NOT common ownership)	Veil is a parallel Mitton-lineage mill, shared mentor, not shared owners.	CORROBORATED
Jay Mitton → Guardian Law LLC (Orem)	lineage only (NOT common ownership)	Guardian is a parallel Mitton-lineage mill, shared mentor, not shared owners.	CORROBORATED
Fortune Law Firm (Las Vegas) → Zachariah Parry	owned by	Establishes Fortune Law's ownership.	CORROBORATED	—
Fortune Law Firm (Las Vegas) → Art McOmber / Fortress	shared roster	McOmber and Josh Johnson appear on the same Fortune Law roster.	CORROBORATED
BAMF Orem 1 LLC → Ammon McNeff	manager / organizer	Official registry report names Ammon McNeff as manager and organizer.	CONFIRMED	—
BAMF Orem 1 LLC → Kragle LLC	BAMF-Orem reacquisition cluster	Both are McNeff-Orem franchise vehicles around the $140k BAMF-Orem reacquisition note.	CORROBORATED
Bricks by the Box (DBA) → Ammon McNeff	applicant	Official registry report names Ammon McNeff as applicant of this LEGO-resale DBA.	CONFIRMED	—
LMTA OLDCO LLC → Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC	renamed husk of	The tax arm was moved to an OLDCO husk, mirroring the LM OLDCO maneuver.	CORROBORATED
Protect Yourself, LLC → Daniel J. McNeff	AP-named shell (McNeff search)	Part of the McNeff asset-protection-named entity cluster.	CORROBORATED
LegalProcessThree, LLC → Daniel J. McNeff	AP-named shell (McNeff search)	Part of the McNeff asset-protection-named entity cluster.	CORROBORATED
NFM Marketing, LLC → Ammon McNeff	recent McNeff entity	Formed 11/22/2025, a fresh marketing vehicle in the McNeff portfolio.	CORROBORATED
Mark Comer → FTC v. iMall (Comer, 1999 stipulated judgment)	identified as ~95% (the iMall promoter)	Centra's Mark Comer, manager of the vehicle that now owns the Legally Mine 2026 brand, is corroborated, about 95%, as the Mark R. Comer named in the FTC's 1999 iMall stipulated judgment (a $3.25M redress judgment plus a five-year, $500k-bond-conditioned restraint on marketing business opportunities). The identity is not confirmed; drawn dashed.	CORROBORATED	FTC v. iMall, 2:99-CV-03650 (C.D. Cal. 1999) ↗
LEGALLY MINE LLC 2026 DBA → Legally Mine old operating entity	revives the “Legally Mine” brand of	The litigated Legally Mine LLC was renamed to the empty husk LM OLDCO (5/22/2026) while the “Legally Mine” name was re-registered as a 2026 DBA owned by Centra Wealth Solutions (Comer/Johnston), the brand carried forward to a new, FTC-shadowed operator and the litigated shell left behind.	CORROBORATED	—
DIB Capital Inc. → Legally Mine old operating entity	MCA creditor, sued Legally Mine	DIB Capital sued Legally Mine in the 2025 merchant-cash-advance siege (N.Y. 516236/2025), one of the advance creditors closing in alongside Swiss Fund and Castle Funding.	CONFIRMED	DIB v. Legally Mine (N.Y. 516236/2025) ↗
LMRA Services Inc → Daniel J. McNeff	Daniel McNeff's captive registered-agent corp	LMRA Services Inc (Anchorage; AK #10045051) is a proven Daniel McNeff holding, the captive registered agent / back-office that serves as the agent of record for thousands of Alaska and Utah entities. It is the connective tissue of the mill: the single name that ties the scattered shells back to one operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Legal Bear LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Legal Elf LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Big Blue Bungalow LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → LM OLDCO LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → LMTA OLDCO LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Procure LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Shield LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Team Dentistry LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → DDL Investments LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Kragle LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → Protect Yourself, LLC	agent of record for	LMRA Services Inc is the registered agent of record for this entity, one spoke of the captive-agent mill that ties the scattered McNeff shells back to a single operator.	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA Services Inc → LMRA mill: ~11,500 agented entities	anchors the wider mill	Beyond the named shells, LMRA Services is the agent of record for roughly 5,300 Alaska and 6,200 Utah entities, the bulk of the web this map can only sample.	CONFIRMED	—
Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine, FST-CV-25-6072810-S → Legally Mine old operating entity	names as defendant + cross-collateral pool	Swiss Fund's Connecticut complaint (FST-CV-25-6072810-S) names Legally Mine and Daniel McNeff with a sworn “McNeff owns and controls Legally Mine” and a cross-collateral addendum binding six commonly-controlled entities.	CONFIRMED	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (Conn. FST-CV-25-6072810-S) ↗

The sprawlThe McNeff entity portfolio

The enterprise wins through obfuscation, so here is the opposite: an official Utah registry search on the McNeff name returns the family’s whole entity portfolio, dozens of companies, most dormant, spanning the asset-protection firm and its OLDCO husks, the Bricks & Minifigs vehicles, asset-protection-named shells (Afraid of Lawsuits, Protect Yourself, LegalProcessThree), and personal holdings. The renaming pattern is the tell: the litigated Legally Mine LLC became LM OLDCO LLC (5/22/2026) and the tax arm became LMTA OLDCO LLC, leaving husks behind while fresh names carry forward.

11 rows are confirmed by an official Business Information Report we hold (principal named), these get a 📄 link. search rows appear in the McNeff registry search (principal not separately pulled). same-name? rows, older filtration/separations companies, appeared in the search but are not confirmed McNeff and may be a different McNeff or a pre-asset-protection venture; pull the report before relying.

Entity	Reg #	Type	Status	McNeff principal	Tie	Source
AFRAID OF LAWSUITS, LLC	11293087	LLC	Dissolved 2019	Ammon D. McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
ALIESHA'S WONDER, L.L.C.	13315112	LLC	Dissolved 2023	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
ALLIGATOR DIVIDEND MANAGEMENT, LLC	9629819	LLC	Dissolved 2015	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
ASSOCIATION MARKETING, LLC	8093469	LLC	Dissolved 2011	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
BAM IP HOLDINGS, LLC	14592179	LLC	Active	Ammon & Mathew McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
BAMF OREM 1 LLC	14522452	LLC	Dissolved 2024	Ammon McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
BEAR-ELF INC.	6107248	Corp	Dissolved	Daniel & Evelyn F. McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
BLACK HOUND PRODUCTIONS, LLC	7062353	LLC	Dissolved 2008	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
BRICKS BY THE BOX (DBA)	13447061	DBA	Cancelled	Ammon McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
BRINDLE BOXER, LLC, THE	8097979	LLC	Dissolved 2011	Ammon McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
CENTRAL UTAH FILM FUND	7459108	Nonprofit	Dissolved 2009	Ammon McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
CORNER COTTAGE, LLC	10331803	LLC	Dissolved 2017	Daniel McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
DARE TO DREAM HOLDINGS, LLC	6250523	LLC	Dissolved 2006	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
DDL INVESTMENTS, LLC	12343181	LLC	Active	Daniel McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
INTERMOUNTAIN FILTER SERVICE, INC.	1140950	Corp	Dissolved 1991	—	UNRESOLVED	registry ↗
KRAGLE, LLC	10416374	LLC	Active	Ammon, Karen, Matthew & Nicole McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
LEAGUE OF HEROES LEATHER, LLC	9284656	LLC	Dissolved 2015	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
LEGAL BEAR LLC	8097970	LLC	Active	Daniel McNeff	CONFIRMED	registry ↗
LEGALPROCESSTHREE, LLC	8132151	LLC	Dissolved 2011	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
LM OLDCO LLC	7228976	LLC	Active	Daniel J. McNeff	CONFIRMED	—
LMRA SERVICES, INC.	11676318	Corp (foreign)	Active	—	CONFIRMED	registry ↗
LMTA OLDCO LLC	11646910	LLC	Active (Delinquent)	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
MAKAMA LLC	8097964	LLC	Dissolved 2011	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
MEDISOURCE MARKETING, LLC	9224895	LLC	Active	Daniel McNeff	CONFIRMED	registry ↗
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ASSET PROTECTION, INC.	6705605	Corp	Dissolved 2007	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
NFM MARKETING, LLC	14633312	LLC	Active (2025)	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
NICOSH, LLC	8841774	LLC	Dissolved 2013	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
PROCURE SYSTEMS, LLC	13021278	LLC	Active	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
PROCURE, LLC	10875462	LLC	Active	Daniel McNeff	CONFIRMED	registry ↗
PROTECT YOURSELF, LLC	9015464	LLC	Dissolved 2014	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
PULSE JET FILTER SERVICES OF UTAH, LLC	4974406	LLC	Dissolved 2001	—	UNRESOLVED	registry ↗
PULSE JET, INC.	4853273	Corp	Dissolved 2000	—	UNRESOLVED	registry ↗
RIVENDELL ESTATES, LLC	9821053	LLC	Dissolved 2016	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FILTER SERVICE, INC.	1339335	Corp	Dissolved 1997	—	UNRESOLVED	registry ↗
ROSEPINE HAVEN PUBLISHING, LLC (DBA)	13630549	DBA	Active	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
TEAM DENTISTRY, LLC	13558625	LLC	Active	Daniel McNeff	CONFIRMED	registry ↗
UTAH SPORT FENCING CENTER, LLC	8139738	LLC	Dissolved 2011	—	CORROBORATED	registry ↗
ZIRCHROM SEPARATIONS, INC.	9888061	Corp (foreign)	Dissolved 2016	—	UNRESOLVED	registry ↗

★ The reckoningThe legal arguments, in full

This is the legal reckoning, told the way the story runs, strongest move first. Every claim is graded on its own, and every citation is a box you can open: a case or statute, or a numbered record, each carrying a flag for how far it has been checked. The honest headline: this is not a proven fraud case, and calling it one would be the overreach that sinks the rest. What is settled is an unlicensed-law operator; what is documented is a repeatable playbook for frustrating creditors, run by the family on its own collapsing franchise, and a matching habit of ending every dispute before it can be tested, by consent, dismissal, arbitration, or settlement rather than a ruling; and the most powerful move is not an accusation at all. It is Utah’s anti-SLAPP law, which can dissolve the whole retaliation suit and make Bricks & Minifigs pay the critic’s fees, with the fight to tear up its gag order close behind.

First, how the machine works, because the lawsuit is the last move in a pattern, not the start of one. The through-line that explains both halves of this story is one instinct: never let the facts be tested. The family sells a product for making assets hard to find, and it runs its own disputes so they stay hard to adjudicate, settled, consented, arbitrated, dismissed, or gagged before any neutral can weigh them. The asset-protection business and the litigation reflex are a single move pointed at two targets. The family sells asset protection: a vendor, Legally Mine, that for two decades taught clients to make themselves hard to sue and hard to collect from, a business an Ohio court has now ruled is the unlicensed practice of law. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History They then appear to have run the same creditor-frustration playbook on their own insolvent toy franchise, and it runs the same way every time: manufacture a default, seize the store and whatever is inside it, resell to insiders, then move the valuable parts out of reach, a fresh holding company stood up to receive the trademarks Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization BAM IP Holdings LLC 5227635 Certificate of Organization, the litigated company renamed to an empty husk, the brand handed to a man the FTC won a 1999 consumer-redress judgment against over the iMall internet venture. When the critic documented it, the answer was not a refund but every institution within reach at once: a racketeering suit BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint, a gag order BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction, and, after a traffic stop, a stalking warrant that seized nothing American-Fork-Police-Warrant-3352981-Search-Warrant, the same insider who took over the store having called the police on him. Each beat below is tied to a box.

The critic’s defense , strongest first

The most powerful cardCan he end the whole suit, and make them pay?

Utah has an anti-SLAPP law, written for exactly this situation: a lawsuit filed to punish someone for speaking on a matter of public concern. It is the single most powerful card the critic holds, because it does not merely defend against the racketeering claims one by one. It can end the entire suit at once and shift the cost of the fight back onto Bricks & Minifigs. And the window to use it has not run, so this is a live lever, not a lost one.

The vehicleUtah’s Public Expression Protection Act lets a speech defendant file a special motion that freezes all discovery the instant it is filed, forces the plaintiff to come forward with admissible proof that its case can actually win, and dismisses the suit with prejudice if it cannot, with the speaker’s attorney fees and costs shifted to the plaintiff. Utah Code 78B-25-101 et seq. (UPEPA)✓ Mackey v. Krause✓

Why it is the strongestEvery other defense answers one piece of the case. This one answers all of it at once. The automatic discovery stay stops the lawsuit itself from being used as the punishment; the merits screen reaches every count, speech and non-speech alike; and the mandatory fee-shift means a plaintiff that filed a SLAPP and loses pays for having filed it. On this motion the exposure runs toward BAM, not toward the critic. Utah Code 78B-25-101 et seq. (UPEPA)✓

Why it is especially dangerous to BAMThis enterprise has a habit of ending its disputes without a tested record: the Ohio unauthorized-practice case closed on consent, with an express waiver of any hearing Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History; the family’s own federal suit was voluntarily dismissed Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc12 Voluntary Dismissal 2021-02-10; the cash-advance actions ended in withdrawal and settlement rather than judgment Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Stipulation of Settlement; and the consumer case was steered into private arbitration. A special motion forces the one thing that pattern is built to avoid: BAM must prove its case on the record, in open court, or lose with prejudice. The move that quietly ends every other dispute, settle, dismiss, arbitrate, consent, is exactly the move this motion takes off the table. And BAM’s own exhibits cut against it: the videos it sued over show its principal franchise-seller daring critics to sue (“sue us, see what happens”) and its side threatening to ‘drag this out in court,’ the posture of a party that courted the fight, not one harassed into it.

And BAM would have to prove actual maliceThe merits screen reaches the defamation theory, so BAM must show not just falsity but fault, and a party that has thrust itself into a public controversy is a limited-purpose public figure that must prove the speaker acted with actual malice, knowing or reckless falsity, by clear and convincing evidence. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.✓ Courts have put exactly this kind of plaintiff in that box, a controversial, high-profile company that sues its critics. Resolute Forest Prods. v. Greenpeace Int'l✓ BAM put itself there: its own filed exhibits show its people daring the suit and engaging the fight in public, and on its own pleading no court or agency has found it was robbed, so the malice it would have to prove is a showing it cannot make. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan✓

Public concern is the gate, and it is wide openThe motion is available whenever the speech is on a matter of public concern, and a franchisor’s treatment of its franchisees and of consumers squarely qualifies. That is why BAM’s likely answer, that this is only a private commercial grudge, does not hold: a 400-store national franchise, an ‘authorized LEGO reseller’ pitch, and a missing customer collection are exactly the kind of subject the public has a stake in. Snyder v. Phelps✓

The timing is live, not forfeitedThe special-motion clock is keyed to the response date, and the statute leaves the court discretion to entertain the motion on a showing of good cause, which an out-of-state, self-represented defendant served by email has in abundance. The earlier worry that the window had simply lapsed does not survive a careful read of the statute. Utah Code 78B-25-103✓

The recommended move (for his counsel to weigh)Put together, the recommendation is straightforward: file the special motion, and press the prior-restraint challenge to the gag in parallel, because that harm is ongoing. The motion does the one thing this enterprise spends everything to avoid, it forces a tested record. One caution worth flagging: the motion belongs in state court, where this case sits, because the Tenth Circuit has held that a state anti-SLAPP special motion is a procedural device that may not carry into federal court, so any attempt to remove the case should be watched and resisted. Los Lobos Renewable Power, LLC v. Americulture, Inc.✓

Provable nowIs the gag order even legal?

A court can punish a lie after a trial decides it is one. What it almost never may do is order speech taken down before any trial has found it false. Lawyers call that a prior restraint, and it is the most urgent card on the table: the gag is silencing him right now, and the argument does not turn on who wins anything else.

Settled lawPrior restraints carry a heavy presumption against them, most of all when the speech is reporting on a public dispute. Near v. Minnesota✓ Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart✓ Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan✓

On the recordThe order was entered on a one-sided motion, no hearing, no finding that anything the critic said was false, yet it orders the videos “immediately removed.” BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction

BAM’s likely answerBAM will argue the order targets harassment and doxxing, not speech. That defends the no-contact clauses, but not the takedown clause, which reaches pure publication. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction

Utah agreesUtah’s own courts have struck speech restraints entered without notice and a hearing. KUTV, Inc. v. Conder✓

A reach, claim by claimCan they turn criticism into racketeering?

BAM sued the critic under Utah’s racketeering statute. The honest read: it is overbuilt, and it falls apart piece by piece, but not in one categorical blow, because the complaint pleads real (non-speech) crimes alongside the speech.

Strike the speech ‘crimes’Half of BAM’s listed ‘predicates’, defamation, disparagement, harassment, interference, simply aren’t on Utah’s closed list of racketeering acts, and courts strike them. Walker v. Beaumont Indep. Sch. Dist.✓ Utah Code 76-17-401(4)✓

Then test what’s leftWhat remains are fraud-type counts that, under the statute, must be pleaded ‘with particularity against each defendant.’ A vague group accusation does not clear that bar. Utah Code 76-17-403(7)✓ Holbrook v. Master Protection Corp.✓

The enterprise problemOn the main racketeering theory the ‘person’ sued must be distinct from the ‘enterprise’, hard when the defendants and the alleged enterprise are the same handful of people. It narrows the count, doesn’t end the case. State v. Hutchings✓

Where it does NOT dieOne honest caution: BAM clears the ‘pattern’ element comfortably, and Utah’s statute (unlike the federal one) reaches injury to a person’s reputation, so the win is by narrowing, not a knockout. Hill v. Estate of Allred✓ Utah Code 76-17-403(1)(a)✓

The core questionWas anything he actually said false?

Defamation turns on falsity, and the law splits the critic’s words into three buckets, each treated differently.

Opinion and insultsCalling the operation a ‘scam’ in heated commentary is protected opinion; only a provably-false statement of fact is actionable. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.✓ West v. Thomson Newspapers✓

Public concernA franchisor’s treatment of franchisees and consumers is a matter of public concern, which raises the bar BAM must clear. Snyder v. Phelps✓

The one that bitesThe defense is weakest on the specific, quantified charge that ‘these defendants stole $200,000’: substantial truth can’t save a false number, and the real unexplained gap is far smaller and points at the store, not the franchisor. Confine truth to the consignment ‘sting.’ Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.✓

Public figureIf BAM is a limited-purpose public figure, it must also prove ‘actual malice’, demanding, and a narrow wedge given the 5/23 doubling-down after a 5/21 correction. Wayment v. Clear Channel✓

Assertable, but exposedCan the critic counter-sue?

The strongest counter-claims are conduct-based, not about who wins the defamation fight.

Interference, nowThe suit-plus-gag-plus-takedown-demands, if done by improper means, is actionable interference with his channel’s economic relationships, and it doesn’t require BAM’s suit to end first. Eldridge v. Johndrow✓

Malicious prosecution, not yetSuing BAM for bringing the racketeering case has to wait until that case ends in the critic’s favor, premature while it is pending. Gilbert v. Ince✓

Abuse of processAvailable now in theory, but Utah recently rejected ‘bad-motive TRO’ and ‘takedown demand’ as the wrongful act, this authority cuts against him and must be confronted. Mackey v. Krause✓ Hatch v. Davis✓

Contingent on the recordAnd the police raid?

A warrant (No. 3352981) charging stalking, with a LEGO-seizure add-on, returned ‘no items seized’, and the department released bodycam only after blacking ~3 hours of video and muting ~94 minutes of audio against a leaked unredacted copy. The cleanest claims here aren’t even the critic’s.

The co-occupantsPeople merely present when the warrant ran have a strong false-arrest claim, presence is not probable cause to seize a person. Ybarra v. Illinois✓ Franks v. Delaware✓

The redaction patternA Monell theory against the department rides on the selective bodycam transparency, fact-dependent, and resting on the dossier’s own redaction analysis, which still needs authentication. Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs.✓

The affirmative case , what the record supports against the enterprise

These are conduct-anchored theories a plaintiff (the Gormans, the consignor, a former Legally Mine client, or a regulator) could bring. All are fact-dependent; none asserts proven fraud.

Settled in OhioThe unlicensed-law machine

The foundation is not an allegation, it is a ruling.

AdjudicatedThe Ohio Supreme Court found Legally Mine and Daniel McNeff engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, with an injunction, client notice/refunds, and a penalty. UPL is state-specific, so the pattern is reportable wherever it sold. Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History Utah Code 78A-9-103✓

Documented, fact-dependentThe manufactured default

The franchisee’s case is that BAM engineered the very defaults it used to terminate.

The contract splitBAM allegedly terminated under the no-cure clause (14.A) for what were payment defaults belonging in the 10-day notice-and-cure clause (14.B), after never transferring the bank account or assigning the lease, the two steps that would have prevented the defaults. And BAM’s own disclosure understates the cure rights it later invoked: the 2026 FDD’s Item 17 compresses the cure structure into a single five-day and thirty-day window, where the franchise agreement itself sets out several tiers, making the cure track look narrower on paper than the contract makes it. Exhibit A Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-A-LEGO-Email FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026

CorroborationBAM’s own June 2026 capitulation, closing the store, parting with the insider operators, contacting the consignor about restitution, supports the franchisee’s account.

Strong on titleThe collection that vanished

A father’s Star Wars LEGO collection went in on consignment and never fully came back.

Title stayed with the ownerThe consignment agreement says the goods ‘shall remain the property of Mansell until sold,’ so seizing and selling them is conversion regardless of the franchise fight. BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A Alta Industries Ltd. v. Hurst✓

The money cross-currentThe honest complication: part of the unexplained money traces to the store and its local operators, not a clean franchisor theft, but legal title to the unsold sets still favors the consignor.

Inference from the recordSeized, then sold to insiders

The store passed from the franchisee to BAM’s corporate hand to ‘independent’ buyers who were anything but.

Who bought itThe buyers were BAM’s own repossession inspector and a BAM corporate recruiter, now co-plaintiffs sharing BAM’s counsel, which can make the successor liable as a mere continuation if the deal was a fraudulent escape. Oregon Registry: Eugene Baker Bricks INC OR Filing Records Tabor v. Metal Ware Corp.✓

The missing paperBAM pleads a ‘bona fide acquisition’ but never filed the purchase agreement, the one document that would settle it, still behind discovery.

The signature moveMoving the assets out of reach

The same creditor-frustration pattern Legally Mine sold, run on BAM itself, while it was insolvent and the litigation peaked.

The IP carve-outThe trademarks were carved into a new holding company owned by the McNeff sons on 16 July 2025, with the operating company keeping the use and the new holding company giving nothing of value for them. The timing is the tell. BAM’s own audited financials show the operating company was insolvent when the carve-out happened, with negative equity of −$492,495 for FY2024 and −$621,091 for FY2025 under a clean audit opinion. A transfer of the crown-jewel assets to insiders, for less than fair value, while the transferor is insolvent and its litigation is peaking, is the textbook badge of a voidable transfer. Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization BAM IP Holdings LLC 5227635 Certificate of Organization FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 Utah Code 25-6-203✓

The husk + the brand handoffLegally Mine was renamed to an empty husk while the brand reappeared under Centra Wealth, run by a Mark Comer corroborated (~95%) as the iMall promoter the FTC won a 1999 redress judgment against. The MCA creditors (Swiss, Castle) had already sued. Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Additional Parties Page Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc14 Exhibit 1a Picture of Busine

Veil / alter-egoIf the entities are one in substance and the form is being used to dodge creditors, a court can disregard it, Utah’s two-prong test, applied against the cross-collateral pledge binding the McNeff entities. Jones & Trevor Marketing v. Lowry✓

Confirmed from BAM’s own filingsThe disclosure that wasn’t true

This is the one record the family could not keep off the table. To sell franchises at all, BAM had to commit sworn facts to a public filing, and that filing impeaches itself, more than once, in a document the CEO signs as factually true. It is the most regulator-ready piece, because the examiner already holds the paper.

Two facial contradictionsEvery FDD says BAM has ‘no parents,’ yet the CFO’s own bio names a parent since 2016; and the ‘independent’ Salem buyers are listed elsewhere as BAM corporate staff. A careful word on what this is and is not: these are contradictions inside BAM’s own filings, which is exactly what makes them hard to wave away, but whether the omissions were knowing is a question for a franchise examiner or a fact-finder, not something the paper settles by itself. FDD: MN Cards 31301-202404-06 FDD

Oregon or Delaware?The 2026 FDD calls BAM a ‘Delaware corporation, formed October 11, 2023’ in Item 1, and the audited financials agree (‘now recognized as a Delaware Corporation’). Yet the franchise agreements, the signature blocks, and the notarized consent-to-service in the very same document describe an Oregon corporation, and Oregon’s registry shows that Oregon entity dissolved in June 2024. A franchisor that does not state consistently what it even is, in the filing a buyer relies on. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026

The sale the filing leaves outBAM’s own complaint says it repossessed the Salem store on November 14, 2024 and sold it on March 27, 2025 to Baker (owned by Brandon Best and Josh Johnson), yet the FDD reports zero Oregon outlets reacquired in 2024 and zero sold to franchisees in 2025 and skips the note that should explain the sale. The sharper problem is what kind of sale it was. BAM calls it ‘arm’s-length,’ but a deal can be arm’s-length on its terms and still be a related-party transaction, and this one is: Johnson is a BAM corporate franchise-recruiter, and Baker holds both the Salem and the Eugene franchises. Related-party transactions must be disclosed, with their terms, in the footnotes to the audited financial statements every FDD requires, and there is no such footnote for either sale. The arm’s-length defense, even if true, does not cure that; it confirms there was a related-party deal to disclose. A franchise examiner can require corrected audited financials and could hold the registration until they are filed. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint Oregon Registry: Eugene Baker Bricks INC OR Filing Records

Even the arithmeticBeyond the contradictions, the FDD’s own figures do not reconcile: it labels quartiles as ‘percentiles,’ its franchise-revenue tables miss their stated totals by $301,251.59 and by $1,842,285.31, its performance tiers overlap impossibly, and its audited-statement notes run out of order. No single error is decided here, but a disclosure this internally unreliable is itself a regulator’s business. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026

And a LEGO letterThe ‘authorized LEGO reseller’ pitch is refuted by LEGO’s own 2/28/2025 letter disclaiming any affiliation, fraud-in-the-inducement on the franchise sale. Exhibit A Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-A-LEGO-Email ORS 650.020✓

The mark is weaker than the pitchItem 13 opens by saying BAM holds ‘registrations on the principal register’ of the federal trademark office, but the only registration it then lists is on the supplemental register, and the same item concedes it: ‘We do not have a federal registration on the principal register for our Bricks & Minifigs standard character mark.’ Supplemental registration carries weaker protection, and the FDD itself warns the buyer they may have to change the name if the mark is challenged, an odd footing for a national brand sold as established. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026

The sellers it will not introduceThe receipt pages name nine people selling the franchise, Josh Johnson and David Ortiz among them, but Item 2, which must give the business background of everyone who offers it, covers only five. Six are omitted, Johnson included, so the franchise-recruiter at the center of the Salem resale is a person the disclosure document is required to introduce and does not. FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026

How to read this. These are the strongest arguments each side could raise on the public record, analysis, not legal advice or a prediction; all allegations remain unproven and the criminal matter carries the presumption of innocence. The chips grade each point: settled / provable now on the record needs the facts a framing point or the other side’s answer. Every citation is a box, a case or statute opening to the free source, or a numbered record, each flagged ✓ verified or ⌛ pending a pinpoint check.

ReferenceThe litigation map

BAM v. Schneider / Mansell, Utah 4th Dist. 260402353 (racketeering + TRO; Judge Tony F. Graf Jr., who also has the McNeff divorce, appearance-of-conflict; co-plaintiffs BAM, Ammon, Matthew, Josh, Best, Baker Bricks, shared counsel).
Gorman / Law v. BAM, Oregon, Marion County (Judge Cornish).
Ohio State Bar v. Legally Mine, 2025-0037 (ADJUDICATED). docket
MCA siege 2025, Swiss (Conn. FST-CV-25-6072810-S link) · DIB (N.Y. 516236/2025 link) · Castle (N.Y. 158140/2025, 11 defendants link)
Eliasieh v. Legally Mine (N.D. Cal. 3:18-cv-03622 + 3:19-cv-05977 link) · Peterson clawback (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 19-01004 link) · McNeff v. McNeff link · FTC v. iMall (Comer’s 1999 FTC stipulated judgment, No. 2:99-CV-03650 FTC)

The full docket inventory is embedded below in the Evidence ledger.

MethodSame-name discipline, what we did NOT merge

Against operators who win by obfuscation, restraint is the credibility. We kept these split unless a document merged them: SHIELLD ≠ generic “Shield LLC” · the 2026 Centra-owned “Legally Mine” assumed names ≠ the old operating entity (no official bridge yet) · Daniel J. McNeff ≠ the look-alike “Jesse Daniel” / “Brian Daniel” McNeff · BAM Products (Brian Mayes, Texas) ≠ BAM Franchising (TTAB adversaries, no common control) · Veil Corporate & Guardian Law ≠ McNeff (Mitton lineage only) · the Alaska “Fortress Management LLC” ≠ McOmber’s Las Vegas Fortress · Driven Capital LLC ≠ BAM’s parent (a Boise lender the CFO separately serves) · John Masek (BAM seller) vs. a same-name 2011 Canby filer = inference, not fact · “Veil Corporate / 2016 Build Summit RICO” = a same-name dead-end · Mark Comer = the iMall figure at ~95%, not confirmed.

★ The receiptsEvidence ledger, the court dockets

The court dockets behind this record. Filter or search to find any case. The numbered primary-source documents that each DOC NNN citation points to are listed in the document index below, and the full archive is linked under Sources.

Court dockets (55)

Docket	Caption	Court	Filed	Grade
3:93-cv-00448	Sonic Dry Clean Inc v. Turner (3:93-cv-00448)	District Court, S.D. California	1993-03-26	METADATA
10-46659	Jesse Daniel McNeff and Kathrine Danielle McNeff (10-46659)	United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington	2010-08-13	METADATA
140400754	LEGALLY MINE LLC vs. DOE, JOHN, Docket No. 140400754 (Utah Dist. Ct. May 27, 2014), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2014-05-27	METADATA
146404514	WORKFORCE SERVICES vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 146404514 (Utah Dist. Ct. May 27, 2014), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2014-05-27	METADATA
146404515	WORKFORCE SERVICES vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 146404515 (Utah Dist. Ct. May 27, 2014), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2014-05-27	METADATA
146404566	WORKFORCE SERVICES vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 146404566 (Utah Dist. Ct. May 29, 2014), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2014-05-29	METADATA
146404571	WORKFORCE SERVICES vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 146404571 (Utah Dist. Ct. May 29, 2014), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2014-05-29	METADATA
146404951	WORKFORCE SERVICES vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 146404951 (Utah Dist. Ct. Jun 12, 2014), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2014-06-12	METADATA
140401736	DWS vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 140401736 (Utah Dist. Ct. Dec 11, 2014), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2014-12-11	METADATA
156401663	WORKFORCE SERVICES vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156401663 (Utah Dist. Ct. Feb 17, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-02-17	METADATA
156401664	WORKFORCE SERVICES vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156401664 (Utah Dist. Ct. Feb 17, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-02-17	METADATA
156402805	UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156402805 (Utah Dist. Ct. Apr 06, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-04-06	METADATA
150400521	LEGALLY MINE LLC vs. DOE, JOHN, Docket No. 150400521 (Utah Dist. Ct. Apr 13, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-04-13	METADATA
156404437	UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156404437 (Utah Dist. Ct. Jun 08, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-06-08	METADATA
156404444	UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156404444 (Utah Dist. Ct. Jun 08, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-06-08	METADATA
156404446	UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156404446 (Utah Dist. Ct. Jun 08, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-06-08	METADATA
156404450	UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156404450 (Utah Dist. Ct. Jun 08, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-06-08	METADATA
156404459	UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156404459 (Utah Dist. Ct. Jun 08, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-06-08	METADATA
156404473	UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156404473 (Utah Dist. Ct. Jun 08, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-06-08	METADATA
156404475	UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 156404475 (Utah Dist. Ct. Jun 08, 2015), Court Docket	Utah District Court	2015-06-08	METADATA
021428-15	Daniel J. McNeff & Evelyn F. McNeff v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Docket No. 021428-15 (U.S.T.C. Aug 24, 2015), Court Docket	U.S. Tax Court	2015-08-24	METADATA
2015CI14364	BARRY G WORTHAM MD vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC, Docket No. 2015CI14364 (Tex. Dist. Ct. Aug 28, 2015), Court Docket	Texas District Court	2015-08-28	METADATA
C-63-CV-201700683	RUBEN vs. LEGALLY, Docket No. C-63-CV-201700683 (Pa. Comm. Pleas Ct. Feb 09, 2017), Court Docket	Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas	2017-02-09	METADATA
3:18-cv-03622	Eliasieh v. Legally Mine, LLC, Docket No. 3:18-cv-03622 (N.D. Cal. Jun 18, 2018), Court Docket	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California	2018-06-18	METADATA
3:18-cv-03621	Kasra v. Legally Mine, LLC, Docket No. 3:18-cv-03621 (N.D. Cal. Jun 18, 2018), Court Docket	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California	2018-06-18	METADATA
19-01004	Peterson v. Legally Mine, LLC (19-01004)	United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington	2019-01-09	METADATA
2:19-ap-01004	Peterson v. Legally Mine, LLC, Docket No. 2:19-ap-01004 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Jan 09, 2019), Court Docket	U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington	2019-01-09	METADATA
A18-1554	In the Matter of Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-RM2, Docket No. A18-1554 (Minn. Sup. Ct. Jun 12, 2019), Court Docket	Minnesota Supreme Court	2019-06-12	METADATA
3:19-cv-05977	Eliasieh v. Legally Mine, LLC, Docket No. 3:19-cv-05977 (N.D. Cal. Sep 24, 2019), Court Docket	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California	2019-09-24	METADATA
20-40193	Jace & Ace, LLC (20-40193)	United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas	2020-01-21	METADATA
CL20000496-00	MCNEFF, AMMON vs. MCNEFF, DANIEL, Docket No. CL20000496-00 (Va. Cir. Ct. Jan 29, 2020), Court Docket	Virginia Circuit Court	2020-01-29	METADATA
N20M-02-006	CLOSED LEGALLY MINE LLC ET.AL V. DANIEL MCNEFF, Docket No. N20M-02-006 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb 07, 2020), Court Docket	Delaware Superior Court	2020-02-07	METADATA
2:21-cv-00048	McNeff et al v. McNeff et al, Docket No. 2:21-cv-00048 (D. Utah Jan 22, 2021), Court Docket	U.S. District Court for the District of Utah	2021-01-22	METADATA
23CV16003	BAM Franchising, Inc.vsMatthew Bauman, Sarah Bauman, Austin King, K2 Bricks LLC, Docket No. 23CV16003 (Or. Cir. Ct. Apr 18, 2023), Court Docket	Oregon Circuit Court	2023-04-18	METADATA
23-2-15156-9	ELMI ET ANO vs. BRECHT ET AL, Docket No. 23-2-15156-9 (Wa. Super. Ct. Aug 14, 2023), Court Docket	Washington Superior Court	2023-08-14	METADATA
23CV36974	BAM Franchising, Inc.vsPlastic Palette, LLC, David Alan Thornton, Leah Marie Brown, Christina Maria Cooper, Docket No. 23CV36974 (Or. Cir. Ct. Sep 12, 2023), Court Docket	Oregon Circuit Court	2023-09-12	METADATA
24CV06902	Plastic Palette LLC, Christina Maria CoopervsBAM Franchising, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, Docket No. 24CV06902 (Or. Cir. Ct. Feb 07, 2024), Court Docket	Oregon Circuit Court	2024-02-07	METADATA
98426865	BAM Franchising, Inc. v. BAM Products, Inc, Docket No. 98426865 (T.T.A.B. Mar 24, 2025), Agency Docket	Trademark Trial and Appeal Board	2024-02-29	CONFIRMED
98706031	Serial 98706031	USPTO document	2024-08-19	CONFIRMED
2025-0037	Ohio State Bar Association vs. Legally Mine, LLC, et al., Docket No. 2025-0037 (OH. Sup. Ct. Jan 09, 2025), Court Docket	Ohio Supreme Court	2025-01-09	CONFIRMED
	SWISS FUND, LLC v. LEGALLY MINE, LLC Et Al	Connecticut Superior Court	2025-04-07	CONFIRMED
	SWISS FUND, LLC v. LEGALLY MINE, LLC Et Al (FST-CV25-6072810-S)	P	2025-04-07	CONFIRMED
FST-CV-25- 6072810-S	SWISS FUND, LLC vs. LEGALLY MINE, LLC Et Al, Docket No. FST-CV-25- 6072810-S (Conn. Super. Ct. Apr 07, 2025), Court Docket	Court docket	2025-04-07	METADATA
FST-CV-25-6072810-S	SWISS FUND, LLC vs. LEGALLY MINE, LLC Et Al, Docket No. FST-CV-25-6072810-S (Conn. Super. Ct. Apr 07, 2025), Court Docket	Connecticut Superior Court	2025-04-07	METADATA
516236/2025	DIB CAPITAL INC vs. LEGALLY MINE LLC ET AL, Docket No. 516236/2025 (N.Y. Sup Ct. May 15, 2025), Court Docket	New York Supreme Court	2025-05-15	METADATA
91299939	BAM Franchising, Inc. v. BAM Products, Inc, Docket No. 91299939 (T.T.A.B. Jun 25, 2025), Agency Docket	Trademark Trial and Appeal Board	2025-06-25	CONFIRMED
158140/ 2025	CASTLE FUNDING CORP vs. LEGALLY MINE, LLC ET AL, Docket No. 158140/ 2025 (N.Y. Sup Ct. Jun 26, 2025), Court Docket	Court docket	2025-06-26	METADATA
158140/2025	CASTLE FUNDING CORP vs. LEGALLY MINE, LLC ET AL, Docket No. 158140/2025 (N.Y. Sup Ct. Jun 26, 2025), Court Docket	New York Supreme Court	2025-06-26	METADATA
	Eliasieh v. Legally Mine, LLC	CourtListener/RECAP		CONFIRMED
	Jace and Ace LLC	CourtListener/RECAP		CONFIRMED
	Jesse Daniel McNeff and Kathrine Danielle McNeff	CourtListener/RECAP		CONFIRMED
	Kasra v. Legally Mine LLC	CourtListener/RECAP		CONFIRMED
	McNeff v. McNeff	CourtListener/RECAP		CONFIRMED
	Peterson v. Legally Mine LLC	CourtListener/RECAP		CONFIRMED
	Sonic Dry Clean Inc v. Turner	CourtListener/RECAP		CONFIRMED

Appendix ADocument index, the numbered evidence vault

Each DOC NNN chip in this report cites one of these 639 consolidated, redacted primary-source documents. The full archive is public: browse all 639 source records ↗, every file is named by the same number shown on the chip, so any citation is one click and a search away. Published legal authority is linked externally, not vaulted (see the legal-arguments note).

#	Document	What it shows	Category
001	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Foreign Authority	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Foreign Authority [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
002	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
003	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 10	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 10 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
004	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 2	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 2 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
005	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 3	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 3 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
006	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 4	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 4 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
007	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 5	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 5 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
008	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 6	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 6 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
009	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 7	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 7 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
010	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 8	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 8 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
011	Alaska Registry: 10045051 Other 9	Alaska Registry, 10045051 Other 9 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
012	Alaska Registry: 10055588 Other	Alaska Registry, 10055588 Other [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
013	Alaska Registry: 10055588 Other 2	Alaska Registry, 10055588 Other 2 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
014	Alaska Registry: 10055588 Other 3	Alaska Registry, 10055588 Other 3 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
015	Alaska Registry: 10055588 Other 4	Alaska Registry, 10055588 Other 4 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
016	Alaska Registry: 10055588 Other 5	Alaska Registry, 10055588 Other 5 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
017	Alaska Registry: 10055588 Other 6	Alaska Registry, 10055588 Other 6 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
018	Alaska Registry: 10055588 Other 7	Alaska Registry, 10055588 Other 7 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
019	Alaska Registry: 10055588 Other 8	Alaska Registry, 10055588 Other 8 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
020	Alaska Registry: 10069745 Other	Alaska Registry, 10069745 Other [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
021	Alaska Registry: 10069745 Other 3	Alaska Registry, 10069745 Other 3 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
022	Alaska Registry: 10069745 Other 4	Alaska Registry, 10069745 Other 4 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
023	Alaska Registry: 10069745 Other 5	Alaska Registry, 10069745 Other 5 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
024	Alaska Registry: 10069745 Other 6	Alaska Registry, 10069745 Other 6 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
025	Alaska Registry: 10069745 Other 7	Alaska Registry, 10069745 Other 7 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
026	Alaska Registry: 10360899 Other 2	Alaska Registry, 10360899 Other 2 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
027	Alaska Registry: 10360899 Other 3	Alaska Registry, 10360899 Other 3 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
028	Alaska Registry: 10362858 Other	Alaska Registry, 10362858 Other [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
029	Alaska Registry: 10362858 Other 2	Alaska Registry, 10362858 Other 2 [Business registry / Alaska entity registry]	alaska_registry
030	USPTO SN98426865: 98426865 Ext 001 First 30 Day Request	USPTO SN98426865, 98426865 Ext 001 First 30 Day Request [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
031	USPTO SN98426865: 98426865 Ext 001 First 30 Day Request	USPTO SN98426865, 98426865 Ext 001 First 30 Day Request [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
032	USPTO SN98426865: 98426865 Ext 002 Ext Granted	USPTO SN98426865, 98426865 Ext 002 Ext Granted [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
033	USPTO SN98426865: 98426865 Ext 002 Ext Granted	USPTO SN98426865, 98426865 Ext 002 Ext Granted [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
034	USPTO SN98426865: 98426865 Ext 003 Addl 60 Day Request	USPTO SN98426865, 98426865 Ext 003 Addl 60 Day Request [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
035	USPTO SN98426865: 98426865 Ext 003 Addl 60 Day Request	USPTO SN98426865, 98426865 Ext 003 Addl 60 Day Request [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
036	USPTO SN98426865: 98426865 Ext 004 Ext Granted	USPTO SN98426865, 98426865 Ext 004 Ext Granted [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
037	USPTO SN98426865: 98426865 Ext 004 Ext Granted	USPTO SN98426865, 98426865 Ext 004 Ext Granted [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
042	FDD: MN Cards 31301-202404-06 FDD	FDD, MN Cards 31301-202404-06 FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	bam_trademark_franchise
043	Franchise Reg: MN Cards C037776C Order Registration	Franchise Reg, MN Cards C037776C Order Registration [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
044	Franchise Reg: MN Cards C037776C Order Registration	Franchise Reg, MN Cards C037776C Order Registration [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
045	FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C057 FDD	FDD, MN Cards E0034F88 C057 FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	bam_trademark_franchise
046	FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C057 FDD	FDD, MN Cards E0034F88 C057 FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	bam_trademark_franchise
047	Franchise Reg: MN Cards E0034F88 C095 Filing Letter	Franchise Reg, MN Cards E0034F88 C095 Filing Letter [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
048	Franchise Reg: MN Cards E0034F88 C095 Filing Letter	Franchise Reg, MN Cards E0034F88 C095 Filing Letter [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
049	FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C414 FDD	FDD, MN Cards E0034F88 C414 FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	bam_trademark_franchise
050	FDD: MN Cards E0034F88 C414 FDD	FDD, MN Cards E0034F88 C414 FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	bam_trademark_franchise
051	Franchise Reg: MN Cards E0034F88 C577 Consent	Franchise Reg, MN Cards E0034F88 C577 Consent [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
052	Franchise Reg: MN Cards E0034F88 C577 Consent	Franchise Reg, MN Cards E0034F88 C577 Consent [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
053	Franchise Reg: MN Cards E1722ECD Order Registration	Franchise Reg, MN Cards E1722ECD Order Registration [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
054	Franchise Reg: MN Cards E1722ECD Order Registration	Franchise Reg, MN Cards E1722ECD Order Registration [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
055	Franchise Reg: MN Cards F0161E64 C1A7 2018 Letter	Franchise Reg, MN Cards F0161E64 C1A7 2018 Letter [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
056	Franchise Reg: MN Cards F0161E64 C1A7 2018 Letter	Franchise Reg, MN Cards F0161E64 C1A7 2018 Letter [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
057	Franchise Reg: MN Cards F0161E64 C78F Order Amending Registration	Franchise Reg, MN Cards F0161E64 C78F Order Amending Registration [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
058	Franchise Reg: MN Cards F0161E64 C78F Order Amending Registration	Franchise Reg, MN Cards F0161E64 C78F Order Amending Registration [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
059	Franchise Reg: MN Cards FEA39BFE Order Cancelling Registration	Franchise Reg, MN Cards FEA39BFE Order Cancelling Registration [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
060	Franchise Reg: MN Cards FEA39BFE Order Cancelling Registration	Franchise Reg, MN Cards FEA39BFE Order Cancelling Registration [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
065	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Application APP20240229170757	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Application APP20240229170757 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
066	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Application APP20240229170757	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Application APP20240229170757 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
067	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Application APP20240229170757	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Application APP20240229170757 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
068	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Specimen SPE20240229170757	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Specimen SPE20240229170757 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
069	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Specimen SPE20240229170757	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-02-29 Specimen SPE20240229170757 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
070	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-11-20 Non Final Action NFIN20241120134457	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-11-20 Non Final Action NFIN20241120134457 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
071	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-11-20 Non Final Action NFIN20241120134457 Main	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-11-20 Non Final Action NFIN20241120134457 Main [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
072	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-11-20 Non Final Action NFIN20241120134457 Main	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-11-20 Non Final Action NFIN20241120134457 Main [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
073	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
074	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
075	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2024-12-12 Response Office Action ROA20241212191453 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
076	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2025-09-09 Abandonment After Inter Partes E0420250909102100	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2025-09-09 Abandonment After Inter Partes E0420250909102100 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
077	USPTO SN98426865: TSDR sn98426865 2025-09-09 Abandonment After Inter Partes E0420250909102100	USPTO SN98426865, TSDR sn98426865 2025-09-09 Abandonment After Inter Partes E0420250909102100 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
078	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Specimen SPE20240819232831	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Specimen SPE20240819232831 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
079	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Specimen SPE20240819232831	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Specimen SPE20240819232831 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
080	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Specimen SPE20240819232831	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Specimen SPE20240819232831 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
081	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Teas Plus Application FTK20240819232831	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Teas Plus Application FTK20240819232831 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
082	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Teas Plus Application FTK20240819232831	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Teas Plus Application FTK20240819232831 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
083	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Teas Plus Application FTK20240819232831	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2024-08-19 Teas Plus Application FTK20240819232831 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
084	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
085	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
086	USPTO SN98706031: TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901	USPTO SN98706031, TSDR sn98706031 2025-12-02 Registration Certificate ORC20251129121901 [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
087	USPTO SN98426865: Tsdrapi.USPTO.gov Ts Cd Casedocs sn98426865 Content.nonpdf	USPTO SN98426865, Tsdrapi.uspto.gov Ts Cd Casedocs sn98426865 Content.nonpdf [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
088	USPTO SN98706031: Tsdrapi.USPTO.gov Ts Cd Casestatus rn8046031 Info	USPTO SN98706031, Tsdrapi.uspto.gov Ts Cd Casestatus rn8046031 Info [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
089	USPTO SN98426865: Tsdrapi.USPTO.gov Ts Cd Casestatus sn98426865 Info	USPTO SN98426865, Tsdrapi.uspto.gov Ts Cd Casestatus sn98426865 Info [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
090	USPTO SN98706031: Tsdrapi.USPTO.gov Ts Cd Casestatus sn98706031 Info	USPTO SN98706031, Tsdrapi.uspto.gov Ts Cd Casestatus sn98706031 Info [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
091	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 001 Filed and Fee	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 001 Filed And Fee [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	bam_trademark_franchise
092	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 001 Filed and Fee	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 001 Filed And Fee [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	bam_trademark_franchise
093	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 002 Notice Trial Dates	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 002 Notice Trial Dates [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	bam_trademark_franchise
094	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 002 Notice Trial Dates	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Opp 002 Notice Trial Dates [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	bam_trademark_franchise
095	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition Motion for Default	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition Motion For Default [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	bam_trademark_franchise
096	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition Motion for Default	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition Motion For Default [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	bam_trademark_franchise
097	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition TTAB Decision (opp. Sustained)	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition TTAB Decision (opp. Sustained) [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	bam_trademark_franchise
098	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition TTAB Decision (opp. Sustained)	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition TTAB Decision (opp. Sustained) [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	bam_trademark_franchise
099	Texas Comptroller: TX Comptroller BAM Products 32002130931	Texas Comptroller, TX Comptroller BAM Products 32002130931 [Business registry / Texas Comptroller franchise-tax record]	bam_trademark_franchise
100	Texas Comptroller: TX Comptroller BAM Products Search	Texas Comptroller, TX Comptroller BAM Products Search [Business registry / Texas Comptroller franchise-tax record]	bam_trademark_franchise
101	USPTO SN98426865: USPTO sn98426865 BAM Good Bricks Mark	USPTO SN98426865, USPTO sn98426865 BAM Good Bricks Mark [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98426865)]	bam_trademark_franchise
102	USPTO SN98706031: USPTO sn98706031 BAM Mark	USPTO SN98706031, USPTO sn98706031 BAM Mark [Trademark (USPTO) / BAM word/figurative mark prosecution (SN 98706031)]	bam_trademark_franchise
103	Franchise Reg: WI Dfi BAM Franchising Registration Detail	Franchise Reg, WI Dfi BAM Franchising Registration Detail [Franchise (state registration) / State franchise registration (MN/WI)]	bam_trademark_franchise
104	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Inforuptcy Jace Ace 20-40193	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Inforuptcy Jace Ace 20-40193 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	bankruptcy
105	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc1 Pacermonitor	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc1 Pacermonitor [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	bankruptcy
106	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc1 Pacermonitor	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc1 Pacermonitor [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	bankruptcy
107	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc13 Application Employ hersh.403	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc13 Application Employ hersh.403 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	bankruptcy
108	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc13 Application Employ hersh.429	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc13 Application Employ hersh.429 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	bankruptcy
109	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc30 Public pdf.403	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc30 Public pdf.403 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	bankruptcy
110	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc30 Public pdf.429	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Jace Ace 20-40193 doc30 Public pdf.429 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	bankruptcy
111	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
112	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc1 Petition [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
113	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc5 ch11 Meeting Creditors Notice 2020-01-22 PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc5 ch11 Meeting Creditors Notice 2020-01-22 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
114	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc5 ch11 Meeting Creditors Notice 2020-01-22 PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc5 ch11 Meeting Creditors Notice 2020-01-22 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
115	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc6 Notice of Appearance Dallas County 2020-01 PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc6 Notice Of Appearance Dallas County 2020-01 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
116	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc6 Notice of Appearance Dallas County 2020-01 PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc6 Notice Of Appearance Dallas County 2020-01 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
117	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc6 Notice of Appearance Dallas County 2020-01 PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc6 Notice Of Appearance Dallas County 2020-01 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
118	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc7 Status Hearing Notice 2020-01-22 PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc7 Status Hearing Notice 2020-01-22 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
119	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc7 Status Hearing Notice 2020-01-22 PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc7 Status Hearing Notice 2020-01-22 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
120	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc7 Status Hearing Notice 2020-01-22.404 PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Klima 20-40192 doc7 Status Hearing Notice 2020-01-22.404 [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	bankruptcy
121	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction of Judgment PII	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction Of Judgment [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	bankruptcy
122	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction of Judgment PII	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction Of Judgment [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	bankruptcy
123	Legally Mine, LLC: Default Judgment (2019-02-25)	Legally Mine, LLC, Default Judgment (2019-02-25) [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	court
124	Legally Mine, LLC: Satisfaction of Judgment (2019-05-24)	Legally Mine, LLC, Satisfaction of Judgment (2019-05-24) [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	court
125	Federal Trade Commission: Order to Show Cause (1999-09-09)	Federal Trade Commission, Order to Show Cause (1999-09-09) [Litigation / Federal, FTC matter (2:99-cv-03650)]	court
126	Jason Klima, Andrea Klima: Summary of Assets/Liabilities (2020-09-21)	Jason Klima, Andrea Klima, Summary of Assets/Liabilities (2020-09-21) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	court
127	Jason Klima, Andrea Klima: Creditors List (2020-02-11)	Jason Klima, Andrea Klima, Creditors List (2020-02-11) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	court
128	Jason Klima, Andrea Klima: Property Schedule (2020-09-21)	Jason Klima, Andrea Klima, Property Schedule (2020-09-21) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	court
129	Jason and Andrea Klima: Proof of Claim (2020-02-26)	Jason and Andrea Klima, Proof of Claim (2020-02-26) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	court
130	Jace & Ace, LLC: Proof of Claim (2020-02-06)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Proof of Claim (2020-02-06) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	court
131	Jace & Ace, LLC: Proof of Claim (2020-05-20)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Proof of Claim (2020-05-20) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	court
132	Jace & Ace, LLC: Ballot Summary (2020-09-29)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Ballot Summary (2020-09-29) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	court
133	Jace & Ace, LLC: Monthly Operating Report (2020-10-20)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Monthly Operating Report (2020-10-20) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	court
134	Jace & Ace, LLC: Quarterly Operating Report (2021-01-28)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Quarterly Operating Report (2021-01-28) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	court
135	Jace & Ace, LLC: Quarterly Bank Reconciliation (2021-01-28)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Quarterly Bank Reconciliation (2021-01-28) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	court
136	Jace & Ace, LLC: Projections/Cash Flow (2020-09-29)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Projections/Cash Flow (2020-09-29) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	court
137	Delaware Registry: Delaware BAM Franchising Entity Status	Delaware Registry, Delaware BAM Franchising Entity Status [Business registry / Delaware entity status]	delaware_corp
138	FDD: 2022 23080-202204-14 Other	FDD, 2022 23080-202204-14 Other [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
139	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2018 3968-201804-05 Clean FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2018 3968-201804-05 Clean FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
140	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2018 3968-201804-06 Clean FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2018 3968-201804-06 Clean FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
141	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2018 3968-201804-09 Clean FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2018 3968-201804-09 Clean FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
142	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2018 3968-201804-10 Clean FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2018 3968-201804-10 Clean FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
143	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2024 31301-202404-06 Marked FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2024 31301-202404-06 Marked FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
144	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2024 31301-202404-07 Clean FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2024 31301-202404-07 Clean FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
145	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2025 33584-202504-07 Marked FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2025 33584-202504-07 Marked FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
146	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2025 33584-202504-09 Clean FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2025 33584-202504-09 Clean FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
147	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2025 33584-202504-14 Marked FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2025 33584-202504-14 Marked FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
148	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document 2025 33584-202504-15 Clean FDD	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document 2025 33584-202504-15 Clean FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
149	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2012 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2012 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
150	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2012 FDD Preview Franchisepanda	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2012 FDD Preview Franchisepanda [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
151	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2014 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2014 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
152	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2014 FDD Preview Franchisepanda	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2014 FDD Preview Franchisepanda [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
153	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2016 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2016 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
154	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2016 FDD Preview Franchisepanda	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2016 FDD Preview Franchisepanda [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
155	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2018 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2018 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
156	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2018 FDD Preview Franchisepanda	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2018 FDD Preview Franchisepanda [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
157	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2019 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2019 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
158	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2019 FDD Preview Franchisepanda	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2019 FDD Preview Franchisepanda [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
159	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2020 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2020 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
160	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2020 FDD Preview Franchisepanda	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2020 FDD Preview Franchisepanda [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
161	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2021 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2021 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
162	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2021 FDD Preview Franchisepanda	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2021 FDD Preview Franchisepanda [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
163	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2022 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2022 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
164	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2022 FDD Preview Franchisepanda	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2022 FDD Preview Franchisepanda [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
165	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2024 FDD Franchimp Unlocked	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks Minifigs 2024 FDD Franchimp Unlocked [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
166	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document WI BAM Franchising 2026 FDD Official WI	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document WI BAM Franchising 2026 FDD Official WI [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	fdd
167	Franchise Reg: 33584 202504 06 Auditor S Consent Form F	Franchise Reg, 33584 202504 06 Auditor S Consent Form F [Franchise (state registration) / FDD exhibit / auditor consent (MN filing)]	general
168	Legal Elf, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2017-10-12)	Legal Elf, LLC, Initial Biennial Report (2017-10-12) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
169	Wize Grizzly, LLC: Initial Biennial Report (2026-04-24)	Wize Grizzly, LLC, Initial Biennial Report (2026-04-24) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
170	Bear-Elf INC.: Summary of Online Changes (2018-03-15)	Bear-elf Inc., Summary of Online Changes (2018-03-15) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
171	Rivendell Estates, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2017-04-19)	Rivendell Estates, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2017-04-19) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
172	Legally Mine, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2019-02-19)	Legally Mine, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2019-02-19) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
173	Legally Mine, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2017-01-16)	Legally Mine, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2017-01-16) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
174	Legally Mine, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2014-04-01)	Legally Mine, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2014-04-01) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
175	Legally Mine, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2014-03-28)	Legally Mine, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2014-03-28) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
176	Legally Mine, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2012-11-14)	Legally Mine, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2012-11-14) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
177	Afraid OF Lawsuits, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2019-11-12)	Afraid OF Lawsuits, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2019-11-12) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
178	Bear-Elf INC: Summary of Online Changes (2006-11-28)	Bear-elf INC, Summary of Online Changes (2006-11-28) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
179	Corner Cottage, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2018-03-07)	Corner Cottage, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2018-03-07) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
180	League OF Heroes Leather, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2016-12-28)	League OF Heroes Leather, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2016-12-28) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
181	Legal Bear LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2016-07-14)	Legal Bear LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2016-07-14) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
182	Legal Bear LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2020-04-13)	Legal Bear LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2020-04-13) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
183	Legally Mine TAX AND Accounting, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2021-04-22)	Legally Mine TAX AND Accounting, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2021-04-22) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
184	Legally Mine, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2021-02-11)	Legally Mine, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2021-02-11) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
185	Protect Yourself, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2017-04-19)	Protect Yourself, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2017-04-19) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
186	Procure, LLC: Summary of Online Changes (2023-06-22)	Procure, LLC, Summary of Online Changes (2023-06-22) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
187	Utah Registry: Application for Authority BAM Franchising INC 3492719 Application for Authority to Transac	Utah Registry, Application For Authority BAM Franchising Inc 3492719 Application For Authority To Transac [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
188	Central Utah Film Fund: Articles of Incorporation (2009-05-14)	Central Utah Film Fund, Articles of Incorporation (2009-05-14) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
189	Bear-Elf INC.: Articles of Incorporation (2006-01-26)	Bear-Elf Inc., Articles of Incorporation (2006-01-26) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
190	Utah Registry: Assumed Name (DBA) Legally Mine 2026 Entity 6069703 Certificate of Assumed and of True Nam	Utah Registry, Assumed Name (DBA) Legally Mine 2026 Entity 6069703 Certificate Of Assumed And Of True Nam [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
191	Utah Registry: Assumed Name (DBA) Legally Mine Tax and Accounting 2026 Entity 6069756 Certificate of Assu	Utah Registry, Assumed Name (DBA) Legally Mine Tax And Accounting 2026 Entity 6069756 Certificate Of Assu [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
192	Bricks by the Box: Assumed Name (DBA) (UT 2023-06-08)	Bricks by the Box, Assumed Name (DBA) (UT 2023-06-08) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
193	Bricks-Minifigs-financing-records	Bricks-minifigs-financing-records [UCC filing / Bricks & Minifigs financing / UCC records]	general
194	Utah Registry: Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 6061489 Registration Information Change Form	Utah Registry, Centra Wealth Solutions Llc 6061489 Registration Information Change Form [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
195	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization BAM IP Holdings LLC 5227635 Certificate of Organization	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization BAM IP Holdings Llc 5227635 Certificate Of Organization [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
196	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization BTJD Corporate Services LLC 1299920 Certificate of Organizatio	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization BTJD Corporate Services Llc 1299920 Certificate Of Organizatio [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
197	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 5892820 Certificate of Organizatio	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization Centra Wealth Solutions Llc 5892820 Certificate Of Organizatio [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
198	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization LM OLDCO LLC 1778195 Certificate of Organization	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization LM Oldco Llc 1778195 Certificate Of Organization [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
199	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization LM OLDCO LLC 6045616 Amendment to Certificate of Organization	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization LM Oldco Llc 6045616 Amendment To Certificate Of Organization [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
200	Kragle, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2017-06-15)	Kragle, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2017-06-15) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
201	Afraid of Lawsuits, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2019-05-10)	Afraid of Lawsuits, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2019-05-10) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
202	Team Dentistry, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2023-08-23)	Team Dentistry, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2023-08-23) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
203	Rivendell Estates, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2016-05-26)	Rivendell Estates, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2016-05-26) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
204	Alligator Dividend Management, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2015-12-11)	Alligator Dividend Management, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2015-12-11) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
205	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Other Unknown Certificate of Organization 14	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization Other Unknown Certificate Of Organization 14 [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
206	Corner Cottage, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2017-04-12)	Corner Cottage, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2017-04-12) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
207	Dare TO Dream Holdings, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2006-06-20)	Dare TO Dream Holdings, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2006-06-20) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
208	DDL Investments, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2021-06-14)	DDL Investments, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2021-06-14) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
209	Legally Mine, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2009-01-05)	Legally Mine, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2009-01-05) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
210	League of Heroes Leather, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2015-01-20)	League of Heroes Leather, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2015-01-20) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
211	Legal Bear LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2011-09-02)	Legal Bear LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2011-09-02) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
212	LegalProcess Three, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2011-10-19)	LegalProcess Three, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2011-10-19) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
213	Legally Mine Tax and Accounting, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2020-03-20)	Legally Mine Tax and Accounting, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2020-03-20) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
214	Nicosh, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2013-10-31)	Nicosh, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2013-10-31) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
215	ProCure Systems, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2022-09-13)	ProCure Systems, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2022-09-13) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
216	Protect Yourself, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2014-04-21)	Protect Yourself, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2014-04-21) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
217	PROcure, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2018-06-14)	PROcure, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2018-06-14) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
218	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Shielld LLC 3103179 Certificate of Organization	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization Shielld Llc 3103179 Certificate Of Organization [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
219	Kerala House 101, LLC: Articles of Organization (2026-05-04)	Kerala House 101, LLC, Articles of Organization (2026-05-04) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
220	Utah Registry: Filing History BAM Franchising INC 11984597 Filing History All Internal	Utah Registry, Filing History BAM Franchising Inc 11984597 Filing History All Internal [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
221	Utah Registry: Filing History BAM IP Holdings LLC 14333873 Filing History All Internal	Utah Registry, Filing History BAM IP Holdings Llc 14333873 Filing History All Internal [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
222	Utah Registry: Filing History BTJD Corporate Services Commercial Registered Agent 7187183 Filing History	Utah Registry, Filing History BTJD Corporate Services Commercial Registered Agent 7187183 Filing History [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
223	Utah Registry: Filing History BTJD Corporate Services LLC 5746616 Filing History All Internal	Utah Registry, Filing History BTJD Corporate Services Llc 5746616 Filing History All Internal [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
224	Utah Registry: Filing History Centra Wealth Solutions LLC 14421835 Filing History All Internal	Utah Registry, Filing History Centra Wealth Solutions Llc 14421835 Filing History All Internal [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
225	Utah Registry: Filing History Legally Mine 2026 Entity 14441858 Filing History All Internal	Utah Registry, Filing History Legally Mine 2026 Entity 14441858 Filing History All Internal [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
226	Utah Registry: Filing History Legally Mine Tax and Accounting 2026 Entity 14441864 Filing History All Int	Utah Registry, Filing History Legally Mine Tax And Accounting 2026 Entity 14441864 Filing History All Int [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
227	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History All Internal	Utah Registry, Filing History LM Oldco Llc 7228976 Filing History All Internal [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
228	Utah Registry: Filing History LM OLDCO LLC 7228976 Filing History Default	Utah Registry, Filing History LM Oldco Llc 7228976 Filing History Default [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
229	Utah Registry: Filing History Shielld LLC 10950141 Filing History All Internal	Utah Registry, Filing History Shielld Llc 10950141 Filing History All Internal [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
230	Utah Registry: LM OLDCO LLC 1950749 Amendment Art of Org Issuance of Member Interest	Utah Registry, LM Oldco Llc 1950749 Amendment Art Of Org Issuance Of Member Interest [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
231	Utah Registry: LM OLDCO LLC 2003934 Amendment Art of Org Issuance of Member Interest	Utah Registry, LM Oldco Llc 2003934 Amendment Art Of Org Issuance Of Member Interest [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	general
232	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc12 Voluntary Dismissal 2021-02-10	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc12 Voluntary Dismissal 2021-02-10 [Litigation / Federal, McNeff v. McNeff (UTD 2:21-cv-00048)]	general
233	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc12 Voluntary Dismissal 2021-02-10 ↗	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc12 Voluntary Dismissal 2021-02-10 [Litigation / Federal, McNeff v. McNeff (UTD 2:21-cv-00048)]	general
234	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 att2 Exhibit A Legally Mine 2021-01-22	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 att2 Exhibit A Legally Mine 2021-01-22 [Litigation / Federal, McNeff v. McNeff (UTD 2:21-cv-00048)]	general
235	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 att2 Exhibit A Legally Mine 2021-01-22	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 att2 Exhibit A Legally Mine 2021-01-22 [Litigation / Federal, McNeff v. McNeff (UTD 2:21-cv-00048)]	general
236	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 Complaint 2021-01-22	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 Complaint 2021-01-22 [Litigation / Federal, McNeff v. McNeff (UTD 2:21-cv-00048)]	general
237	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 Complaint 2021-01-22 ↗	Mcneff V Mcneff Utd 2-21-cv-00048 doc2 Complaint 2021-01-22 [Litigation / Federal, McNeff v. McNeff (UTD 2:21-cv-00048)]	general
238	Kragle, LLC: Name History/Search (2017-06-15)	Kragle, LLC, Name History/Search (2017-06-15) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
239	Lmta OLDCO LLC: Name History/Search (2026-05-22)	Lmta Oldco LLC, Name History/Search (2026-05-22) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
240	Lmta OLDCO LLC: Name History/Search (2020-03-04)	Lmta Oldco LLC, Name History/Search (2020-03-04) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
241	Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896	Oregon Registry, BAM Franchising 76881896 [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
242	Oregon Registry: BAM Franchising 76881896	Oregon Registry, BAM Franchising 76881896 [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
243	Jace & Ace, LLC: Bankruptcy Claims Register (2020-02-06)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Bankruptcy Claims Register (2020-02-06) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	general
244	Jace & Ace, LLC: Bankruptcy Certificate of Service (2020-08-20)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Bankruptcy Certificate of Service (2020-08-20) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	general
245	Legally Mine, LLC: Amendment of Member Interest (2011-01-04)	Legally Mine, LLC, Amendment of Member Interest (2011-01-04) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
246	Asset Protection Leader, LLC: Amendment of Member Interest (2010-07-08)	Asset Protection Leader, LLC, Amendment of Member Interest (2010-07-08) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
247	LMRA Services, INC.: Foreign Authority Application (2016-11-18)	LMRA Services, Inc., Foreign Authority Application (2016-11-18) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
248	L2 Bricks, LLC: Oregon Filing Record (2016-10-17)	L2 Bricks, LLC, Oregon Filing Record (2016-10-17) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
249	Plastic Palette LLC: Oregon Annual Report (OR 2018-04-11)	Plastic Palette LLC, Oregon Annual Report (OR 2018-04-11) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
250	K2 Bricks LLC: Oregon Annual Report (OR 2022-02-15)	K2 Bricks LLC, Oregon Annual Report (OR 2022-02-15) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
251	BAMF Salem 1, LLC: Oregon Articles of Amendment (2022-06-22)	BAMF Salem 1, LLC, Oregon Articles of Amendment (2022-06-22) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
252	BAM Franchising, INC.: Oregon Information Change (2017-06-06)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Oregon Information Change (2017-06-06) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
253	BAM Franchising, INC.: Information Change (2017-01-30)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Information Change (2017-01-30) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
254	Cerebral Plastics, INC.: Information Change (2020-12-11)	Cerebral Plastics, Inc., Information Change (2020-12-11) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
255	Legal Bear, LLC: Articles of Amendment (2017-04-19)	Legal Bear, LLC, Articles of Amendment (2017-04-19) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
256	Legal Elf, LLC: Articles of Amendment (2017-10-12)	Legal Elf, LLC, Articles of Amendment (2017-10-12) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
257	LMRA Services, INC.: Statement of Change (2019-01-11)	LMRA Services, Inc., Statement of Change (2019-01-11) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
258	Legal Bear, LLC: Address Change (2019-11-29)	Legal Bear, LLC, Address Change (2019-11-29) [Business registry / Entity registry filing (jurisdiction per content)]	general
259	Other Unknown Other 13	Other Unknown Other 13 [Litigation / Other court / discovery]	general
260	ISN Software Corporation: Subpoena Ad Testificandum (2020-02-28)	ISN Software Corporation, Subpoena Ad Testificandum (2020-02-28) [Litigation / Other court / discovery]	general
261	Other Unknown Other 16	Other Unknown Other 16 [Litigation / Other court / discovery]	general
262	Other Unknown Other 17	Other Unknown Other 17 [Litigation / Other court / discovery]	general
263	Other Unknown Other 2	Other Unknown Other 2 [Litigation / Other court / discovery]	general
264	Other Unknown Other 4	Other Unknown Other 4 [Litigation / Other court / discovery]	general
265	Other Unknown Other 7	Other Unknown Other 7 [Litigation / Other court / discovery]	general
266	Other Unknown Other 9	Other Unknown Other 9 [Litigation / Other court / discovery]	general
269	Brindle Boxer, LLC: Reinstatement (OR 2013-04-09)	Brindle Boxer, LLC, Reinstatement (OR 2013-04-09) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
270	Corner Cottage, LLC: Reinstatement (OR 2020-10-09)	Corner Cottage, LLC, Reinstatement (OR 2020-10-09) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
271	Kragle, LLC: Reinstatement (OR 2023-02-08)	Kragle, LLC, Reinstatement (OR 2023-02-08) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
272	Legal Bear LLC: Reinstatement (OR 2014-03-26)	Legal Bear LLC, Reinstatement (OR 2014-03-26) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
273	Kragle, LLC: Reinstatement (OR 2023-02-08)	Kragle, LLC, Reinstatement (OR 2023-02-08) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
274	League OF Heroes Leather, LLC: Reinstatement (OR 2016-05-02)	League OF Heroes Leather, LLC, Reinstatement (OR 2016-05-02) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
275	Afraid OF Lawsuits, LLC: Reinstatement (OR 2020-10-14)	Afraid OF Lawsuits, LLC, Reinstatement (OR 2020-10-14) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
276	Rivendell Estates, LLC: Reinstatement (OR 2020-11-16)	Rivendell Estates, LLC, Reinstatement (OR 2020-11-16) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
278	Jace & Ace, LLC: Bankruptcy Operating Report (2020-08-20)	Jace & Ace, LLC, Bankruptcy Operating Report (2020-08-20) [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	general
279	Plastic Palette LLC: UCC Initial Filing (2022-12-09)	Plastic Palette LLC, UCC Initial Filing (2022-12-09) [UCC filing / Oregon UCC / secured filing]	general
280	Bricks AND Minifigs Canby: Business Renewal (OR 2026-01-05)	Bricks AND Minifigs Canby, Business Renewal (OR 2026-01-05) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	general
281	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Additional Parties Page	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Additional Parties Page [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
282	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Appearance 2025-06-30	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Appearance 2025-06-30 [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
283	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Appearance 2025-06-30	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Appearance 2025-06-30 [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
284	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07 [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
285	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07 [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
286	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
287	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Complaint 2025-04-07.oc [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
288	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Summons 2025-04-07	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Summons 2025-04-07 [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
289	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Summons 2025-04-07	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Doc Summons 2025-04-07 [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
290	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 100 30 Return of Serv	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 100 30 Return Of Serv [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
291	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 100 30 Return of Serv	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 100 30 Return Of Serv [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
292	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 101 01 Order Default	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 101 01 Order Default [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
293	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 101 01 Order Default	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 101 01 Order Default [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
294	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 102 00 Demand for Dis	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 102 00 Demand For Dis [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
295	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 102 00 Demand for Dis	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 102 00 Demand For Dis [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
296	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 103 00 Notice Service	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 103 00 Notice Service [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
297	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 103 00 Notice Service	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 103 00 Notice Service [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
298	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 104 00 Withdrawal of	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 104 00 Withdrawal Of [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
299	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 104 00 Withdrawal of	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) CT fst-cv-25-6072810-s Entry 104 00 Withdrawal Of [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
300	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) Motion for Default	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) Motion For Default [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
301	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) Motion for Default	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) Motion For Default [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	general
306	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) Docket Case History	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) Docket Case History [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	mca_funder
307	Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT) Docket Case History	Swiss Fund V. Legally Mine (CT) Docket Case History [Litigation / MCA collection, Swiss Fund v. Legally Mine (CT FST-CV-25-6072810)]	mca_funder
308	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc14 Exhibit 1a Picture of Busine	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc14 Exhibit 1a Picture Of Busine [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
309	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc15 Exhibit 1b Picture of Busine	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc15 Exhibit 1b Picture Of Busine [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
310	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc16 Exhibit 1c Picture of Busine	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc16 Exhibit 1c Picture Of Busine [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
311	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc2 Exhibit A Notice of Commencem	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) 158140-2025 doc2 Exhibit A Notice Of Commencem [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
312	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
313	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
314	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
315	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
316	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
317	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
318	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
319	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
320	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
321	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
322	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
323	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Notice of Discontinuance	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Notice Of Discontinuance [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
324	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
325	Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint	Castle Funding V. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint [Litigation / MCA collection, Castle Funding v. Legally Mine (NY 158140/2025)]	mca_nyscef
326	Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) 516236-2025 doc2 Exhibit Utah Disclosure Accounts	Dib Capital V. Legally Mine (NY) 516236-2025 doc2 Exhibit Utah Disclosure Accounts [Litigation / MCA collection, DIB Capital v. Legally Mine (NY 516236/2025)]	mca_nyscef
327	Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) 516236-2025 doc4 Answer	Dib Capital V. Legally Mine (NY) 516236-2025 doc4 Answer [Litigation / MCA collection, DIB Capital v. Legally Mine (NY 516236/2025)]	mca_nyscef
328	Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation PII	Dib Capital V. Legally Mine (NY) Affidavit Affirmation [Litigation / MCA collection, DIB Capital v. Legally Mine (NY 516236/2025)]	mca_nyscef
329	Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Notice of Rejection	Dib Capital V. Legally Mine (NY) Notice Of Rejection [Litigation / MCA collection, DIB Capital v. Legally Mine (NY 516236/2025)]	mca_nyscef
330	Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Stipulation of Settlement	Dib Capital V. Legally Mine (NY) Stipulation Of Settlement [Litigation / MCA collection, DIB Capital v. Legally Mine (NY 516236/2025)]	mca_nyscef
331	Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint	Dib Capital V. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint [Litigation / MCA collection, DIB Capital v. Legally Mine (NY 516236/2025)]	mca_nyscef
332	Dib Capital v. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint	Dib Capital V. Legally Mine (NY) Summons & Complaint [Litigation / MCA collection, DIB Capital v. Legally Mine (NY 516236/2025)]	mca_nyscef
333	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc23 Schedules Original Jace Ace LLC	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc23 Schedules Original Jace Ace Llc [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
334	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc23 Schedules Original Jace Ace LLC	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc23 Schedules Original Jace Ace Llc [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
335	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc29 Disclosure Statement for Small Business	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc29 Disclosure Statement For Small Business [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
336	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc29 Disclosure Statement for Small Business	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc29 Disclosure Statement For Small Business [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
337	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc36 Exhibit and Witness List	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc36 Exhibit And Witness List [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
338	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc36-2 Exhibit 2 Disclosure Statement	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc36-2 Exhibit 2 Disclosure Statement [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
339	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc38 Order Confirming Chapter 11 Plan	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc38 Order Confirming Chapter 11 Plan [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
340	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc45 Post Confirmation Report and Application Fo	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc45 Post Confirmation Report And Application Fo [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
341	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc45-1 Proposed Final Decree	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc45-1 Proposed Final Decree [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
342	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc45-2 Service List	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) 20-40193 doc45-2 Service List [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
343	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Declaration	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Declaration [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
344	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Liquidation Analysis	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Liquidation Analysis [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
345	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Plan	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Plan [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
346	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Plan	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Plan [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
347	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Plan	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Plan [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
348	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Plan	Jace & Ace (bankruptcy) Plan [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Jace & Ace LLC (Ch.11, 20-40193)]	mca_nyscef
349	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 claim13-1 Lipt Oak Grove Personal Guaranty Lease Rejec PII	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 claim13-1 Lipt Oak Grove Personal Guaranty Lease Rejec [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
350	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc62-1 Proposed Order Attachment to Conversion Motion	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc62-1 Proposed Order Attachment To Conversion Motion [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
351	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc63 Motion to End Joint Administration	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc63 Motion To End Joint Administration [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
352	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc63-1 Proposed Order Attachment to End Joint Adminis	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc63-1 Proposed Order Attachment To End Joint Adminis [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
353	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc69 Exhibit and Witness List	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc69 Exhibit And Witness List [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
354	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc86 Trustee Notice of Intent to Abandon Litigation C	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc86 Trustee Notice Of Intent To Abandon Litigation C [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
355	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc86-1 Proposed Order Attachment to Abandonment Notic	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc86-1 Proposed Order Attachment To Abandonment Notic [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
356	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc87 Order Approving Abandonment of Litigation Claims	Klima (bankruptcy) 20-40192 doc87 Order Approving Abandonment Of Litigation Claims [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
357	Klima (bankruptcy) Declaration PII	Klima (bankruptcy) Declaration [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
358	Klima (bankruptcy) Motion to Convert	Klima (bankruptcy) Motion To Convert [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
359	Klima (bankruptcy) Motion to Convert	Klima (bankruptcy) Motion To Convert [Litigation / Bankruptcy, Klima (Ch.11, 20-40192)]	mca_nyscef
360	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc1 Complaint	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc1 Complaint [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	mca_nyscef
361	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc1 Complaint	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc1 Complaint [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	mca_nyscef
362	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc4-1 Proposed Default Order Attac	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc4-1 Proposed Default Order Attac [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	mca_nyscef
363	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc8 Judgment.ocr	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) 19-01004-CMA doc8 Judgment.ocr [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	mca_nyscef
364	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) Declaration	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) Declaration [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	mca_nyscef
365	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) Motion for Default	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) Motion For Default [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	mca_nyscef
366	Peterson v. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction of Judgment	Peterson V. Legally Mine (bankr.) Satisfaction Of Judgment [Litigation / Bankruptcy adversary, Peterson v. Legally Mine (19-01004)]	mca_nyscef
367	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
368	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Docket Case History [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
369	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order ↗	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
370	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order ↗	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Final Order [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
371	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-09 Statement of Costs	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-09 Statement Of Costs [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
372	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-09 Statement of Costs	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-09 Statement Of Costs [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
373	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-10 Order Submitted on Board	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-10 Order Submitted On Board [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
374	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-10 Order Submitted on Board	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-10 Order Submitted On Board [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
375	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-xx Certified Mail Legally Mi	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-xx Certified Mail Legally Mi [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
376	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-xx Certified Mail Legally Mi	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-01-xx Certified Mail Legally Mi [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
377	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-02-xx Return Receipt Legally Mi	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-02-xx Return Receipt Legally Mi [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
378	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-02-xx Return Receipt Legally Mi	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-02-xx Return Receipt Legally Mi [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
379	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-ohio-539 Case Announcement	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-ohio-539 Case Announcement [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
380	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-ohio-539 Case Announcement	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Ohio 2025-0037 2025-ohio-539 Case Announcement [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	ohio_upl
407	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 1218441-95 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 1218441-95 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
408	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 1310586-95 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 1310586-95 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
409	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 1772892-96 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 1772892-96 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
410	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 1919115-94 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 1919115-94 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
411	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 2226368-96 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 2226368-96 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
412	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 2227106-91 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 2227106-91 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
413	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 2227110-95 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 2227110-95 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
414	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 2227110-95 Name History OR Search 2	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 2227110-95 Name History OR Search 2 [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
415	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 2227110-95 Name History OR Search 3	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 2227110-95 Name History OR Search 3 [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
416	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 2300936-92 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 2300936-92 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
417	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 2332041-97 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 2332041-97 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
418	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 2367607-99 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 2367607-99 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
419	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 744749-91 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 744749-91 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
420	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 768818-96 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 768818-96 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
421	Oregon Registry: Name History Search Oregon 848854-91 Name History OR Search	Oregon Registry, Name History Search Oregon 848854-91 Name History OR Search [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
422	BRICKS name search: Name Search Results (OR 2026-06-16)	BRICKS name search, Name Search Results (OR 2026-06-16) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
423	Oregon Registry: 1919115-94 OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, 1919115-94 OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
424	Oregon Registry: 848854-91 OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, 848854-91 OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
425	Oregon Registry: Bamf Holdings LLC OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, Bamf Holdings Llc OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
426	Oregon Registry: Bamf Salem 1 LLC OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, Bamf Salem 1 Llc OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
427	Oregon Registry: Bricks and Minifigs Canby Other	Oregon Registry, Bricks And Minifigs Canby Other [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
428	Oregon Registry: Bricks Minifigs 002 Other	Oregon Registry, Bricks Minifigs 002 Other [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
429	Oregon Registry: Bricks Minifigs 002 Other 2	Oregon Registry, Bricks Minifigs 002 Other 2 [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
430	Oregon Registry: Eugene Baker Bricks INC OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, Eugene Baker Bricks Inc OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
431	Oregon Registry: Eugene Baker Bricks INC OR Filing Records 2	Oregon Registry, Eugene Baker Bricks Inc OR Filing Records 2 [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
432	Oregon Registry: k2 Bricks LLC OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, k2 Bricks Llc OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
433	Oregon Registry: Kornish Bricks LLC OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, Kornish Bricks Llc OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
434	Oregon Registry: l2 Bricks LLC OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, l2 Bricks Llc OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
435	Oregon Registry: Plastic Palette LLC OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, Plastic Palette Llc OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
436	Oregon Registry: Salem Baker Bricks INC OR Filing Records	Oregon Registry, Salem Baker Bricks Inc OR Filing Records [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
437	L2 Bricks, LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2017-06-06)	L2 Bricks, LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2017-06-06) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
438	Plastic Palette LLC: Reinstatement Amended (OR 2023-01-06)	Plastic Palette LLC, Reinstatement Amended (OR 2023-01-06) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
439	Plastic Palette LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2023-05-24)	Plastic Palette LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2023-05-24) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
440	K2 Bricks LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2023-03-22)	K2 Bricks LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2023-03-22) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
441	Bamf Salem 1, LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2022-12-14)	Bamf Salem 1, LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2022-12-14) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
442	Bamf Salem 1, LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2024-01-29)	Bamf Salem 1, LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2024-01-29) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
443	Kornish Bricks LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2025-02-07)	Kornish Bricks LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2025-02-07) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
444	Kornish Bricks LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2025-12-27)	Kornish Bricks LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2025-12-27) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
445	BAM Franchising, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2022-03-28)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2022-03-28) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
446	BAM Franchising, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2021-03-11)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2021-03-11) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
447	BAM Franchising, INC.: Reinstatement Amended (OR 2020-08-05)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Reinstatement Amended (OR 2020-08-05) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
448	L2 Bricks, LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2017-06-06)	L2 Bricks, LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2017-06-06) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
449	BAM Franchising, INC.: Reinstatement Amended (OR 2020-08-05)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Reinstatement Amended (OR 2020-08-05) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
450	BAM Franchising, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2019-05-21)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2019-05-21) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
451	BAM Franchising, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2018-03-19)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2018-03-19) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
452	BAM Franchising, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2017-05-09)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2017-05-09) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
453	BAM Franchising, INC.: Reinstatement Amended (OR 2023-09-06)	BAM Franchising, Inc., Reinstatement Amended (OR 2023-09-06) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
454	Cerebral Plastics, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2022-02-25)	Cerebral Plastics, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2022-02-25) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
455	Cerebral Plastics, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2021-04-10)	Cerebral Plastics, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2021-04-10) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
456	Cerebral Plastics, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2021-04-10)	Cerebral Plastics, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2021-04-10) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
457	Cerebral Plastics, INC.: Reinstatement Amended (OR 2020-03-11)	Cerebral Plastics, Inc., Reinstatement Amended (OR 2020-03-11) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
458	Cerebral Plastics, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2018-04-30)	Cerebral Plastics, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2018-04-30) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
459	L2 Bricks, LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2018-05-29)	L2 Bricks, LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2018-05-29) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
460	Cerebral Plastics, INC.: Amended Annual Report (OR 2023-02-27)	Cerebral Plastics, Inc., Amended Annual Report (OR 2023-02-27) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
461	L2 Bricks, LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2019-06-08)	L2 Bricks, LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2019-06-08) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
462	L2 Bricks, LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2020-06-03)	L2 Bricks, LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2020-06-03) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
463	Plastic Palette LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2019-03-11)	Plastic Palette LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2019-03-11) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
464	Plastic Palette LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2020-02-24)	Plastic Palette LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2020-02-24) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
465	Plastic Palette LLC: Amended Annual Report (OR 2021-02-22)	Plastic Palette LLC, Amended Annual Report (OR 2021-02-22) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
466	Plastic Palette LLC: Reinstatement Amended (OR 2023-01-06)	Plastic Palette LLC, Reinstatement Amended (OR 2023-01-06) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
467	Plastic Palette LLC: UCC-1 (OR 2022-12-09)	Plastic Palette LLC, UCC-1 (OR 2022-12-09) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
468	Plastic Palette LLC: UCC-1 (OR 2022-12-09)	Plastic Palette LLC, UCC-1 (OR 2022-12-09) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
469	Bricks AND Minifigs Canby: Renewal of Registration (OR 2026-01-05)	Bricks AND Minifigs Canby, Renewal of Registration (OR 2026-01-05) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
470	Bricks & Minifigs #002: Renewal of Registration (OR 2026-01-05)	Bricks & Minifigs #002, Renewal of Registration (OR 2026-01-05) [Business registry / Oregon entity registry]	oregon_registry
472	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Page	TTAB BAM Franchising Opposition 91299939 Page [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	source_inventory
473	TTAB Page	TTAB Page [Litigation / TTAB opposition, BAM Franchising (91299939)]	source_inventory
474	Utah UCC: Detail	Utah UCC, Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	source_inventory
475	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Bating Paradise LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Bating Paradise Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
476	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah DDL Investments LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah DDL Investments Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
477	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah DDL Investments LLC Annual Report 2	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah DDL Investments Llc Annual Report 2 [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
478	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Flying Wing Management LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Flying Wing Management Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
479	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Flying Wing Management LLC Annual Report 2	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Flying Wing Management Llc Annual Report 2 [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
480	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Legal Bear LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Legal Bear Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
481	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Legally Mine LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Legally Mine Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
482	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Legally Mine LLC Annual Report 2	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Legally Mine Llc Annual Report 2 [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
483	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Legally Mine Tax and Accounting LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
484	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah LMRA Services INC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah LMRA Services Inc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
485	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah LMRA Services INC Annual Report 2	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah LMRA Services Inc Annual Report 2 [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
486	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Procure LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Procure Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
487	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Procure Systems LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Procure Systems Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
488	Utah Registry: Annual Report Utah Team Dentistry LLC Annual Report	Utah Registry, Annual Report Utah Team Dentistry Llc Annual Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
489	Bricks AND Minifigs #051: Assumed Name Registration (UT 2017-07-25)	Bricks AND Minifigs #051, Assumed Name Registration (UT 2017-07-25) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
490	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Utah Bamf Orem 1 LLC Certificate of Organization	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization Utah Bamf Orem 1 Llc Certificate Of Organization [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
491	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Utah Bamf Orem 1 LLC Certificate of Organization 2	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization Utah Bamf Orem 1 Llc Certificate Of Organization 2 [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
492	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Utah Bating Paradise LLC Certificate of Organization	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization Utah Bating Paradise Llc Certificate Of Organization [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
493	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Utah Hurry Home Honey LLC Certificate of Organization	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization Utah Hurry Home Honey Llc Certificate Of Organization [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
494	Utah Registry: Certificate of Organization Utah Nfm Marketing LLC Certificate of Organization	Utah Registry, Certificate Of Organization Utah Nfm Marketing Llc Certificate Of Organization [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
495	LMTA OLDCO, LLC: Amendment to Certificate of Organization (UT 2026-05-21)	LMTA Oldco, LLC, Amendment to Certificate of Organization (UT 2026-05-21) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
496	LM OLDCO, LLC: Amendment to Certificate of Organization (UT 2026-05-21)	LM Oldco, LLC, Amendment to Certificate of Organization (UT 2026-05-21) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
497	BAM IP Holdings, LLC: Certificate of Organization (UT 2025-07-10)	BAM IP Holdings, LLC, Certificate of Organization (UT 2025-07-10) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
498	Utah Registry: Name History Search Utah Name Name History OR Search	Utah Registry, Name History Search Utah Name Name History OR Search [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
499	Centra Wealth Solutions, LLC: Entity Information Search (UT 2026-04-06)	Centra Wealth Solutions, LLC, Entity Information Search (UT 2026-04-06) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
500	Utah Registry: 10165814-0143 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 10165814-0143 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
501	Utah Registry: 10331803-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 10331803-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
502	Utah Registry: 10416374-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 10416374-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
503	Utah Registry: 10462872-0151 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 10462872-0151 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
504	Utah Registry: 10875462-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 10875462-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
505	Utah Registry: 11293087-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 11293087-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
506	Utah Registry: 11622562-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 11622562-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
507	Utah Registry: 11646910-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 11646910-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
508	Utah Registry: 11676318-0143 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 11676318-0143 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
509	Utah Registry: 12343181-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 12343181-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
510	Utah Registry: 13021278-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 13021278-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
511	Utah Registry: 13447061-0151 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 13447061-0151 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
512	Utah Registry: 13558625-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 13558625-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
513	Utah Registry: 14514763-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 14514763-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
514	Utah Registry: 14522452-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 14522452-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
515	Utah Registry: 14522452-0160 Business Info Report 2	Utah Registry, 14522452-0160 Business Info Report 2 [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
516	Utah Registry: 14588263-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 14588263-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
517	Utah Registry: 14592179-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 14592179-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
518	Utah Registry: 14633312-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 14633312-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
519	Utah Registry: 6107248-0142 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 6107248-0142 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
520	Utah Registry: 6250523-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 6250523-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
521	Utah Registry: 7228976-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 7228976-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
522	Utah Registry: 7459108-0140 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 7459108-0140 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
523	Utah Registry: 8097970-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 8097970-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
524	Utah Registry: 8097979-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 8097979-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
525	Utah Registry: 8132151-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 8132151-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
526	Utah Registry: 8841774-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 8841774-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
527	Utah Registry: 9015464-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 9015464-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
528	Utah Registry: 9284656-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 9284656-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
529	Utah Registry: 9629819-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 9629819-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
530	Utah Registry: 9821053-0160 Business Info Report	Utah Registry, 9821053-0160 Business Info Report [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
531	Utah Registry: Legally Mine LLC Entity No 7228976 0142 Other	Utah Registry, Legally Mine Llc Entity No 7228976 0142 Other [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
532	Bricks BY THE BOX: Cancellation of DBA (UT 2024-11-07)	Bricks BY THE BOX, Cancellation of DBA (UT 2024-11-07) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
533	Flying Wing Management, LLC: Statement of Domestication (UT 2024-02-14)	Flying Wing Management, LLC, Statement of Domestication (UT 2024-02-14) [Business registry / Utah entity registry]	utah_registry
534	American-Fork-Police-26AF01974-Trespass-Incident-Report PII	American-Fork-Police-26AF01974-Trespass-Incident-Report [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
535	American-Fork-Police-26AF02007-Harassment-Incident-Report PII	American-Fork-Police-26AF02007-Harassment-Incident-Report [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
536	American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Booking-Sheet ↗ PII	American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Booking-Sheet [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
537	American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Stalking-Harassment-Incident-Report ↗ PII	American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Stalking-Harassment-Incident-Report [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
538	American-Fork-Police-Warrant-3352981-Search-Warrant ↗ PII	American-Fork-Police-Warrant-3352981-Search-Warrant [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
539	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Docket Case History ↗	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Docket Case History [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
540	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Errata PII	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Errata [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
541	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A ↗ PII	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit A [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
542	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit B PII	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit B [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
543	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit G ↗	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit G [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
544	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit I PII	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit I [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
545	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit J	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit J [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
546	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit K	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Exhibit K [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
547	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Filing Receipt PII	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Filing Receipt [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
548	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Order PII	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Order [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
549	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction ↗	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Tro Prelim. Injunction [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
550	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Tro Prelim. Injunction [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
551	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) TRO Prelim. Injunction	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Tro Prelim. Injunction [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
552	BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint ↗ PII	BAM V. Schneider-mansell (UT RICO 260402353) Verified Complaint [Litigation / RICO, BAM v. Schneider-Mansell (UT 260402353)]	utah_rico_260402353
553	Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint ↗	Complaint Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Complaint [Litigation / Franchise dispute, Bricks & Minifigs (260200029, arbitration/termination)]	utah_rico_260402353
554	Complaint Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-small-claim-com ↗	Complaint Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-small-claim-com [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
555	Complaint Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-small-claim-com ↗	Complaint Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-small-claim-com [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
556	Docket Case History Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Docket-Events ↗	Docket Case History Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Docket-Events [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
557	Exhibit A Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-A-LEGO-Email ↗	Exhibit A Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-A-LEGO-Email [Litigation / Franchise dispute, Bricks & Minifigs (260200029, arbitration/termination)]	utah_rico_260402353
558	Exhibit B Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-B-Franchise-Agreement ↗	Exhibit B Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-B-Franchise-Agreement [Litigation / Franchise dispute, Bricks & Minifigs (260200029, arbitration/termination)]	utah_rico_260402353
559	Exhibit D Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-D-Termination-Letter ↗	Exhibit D Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Exhibit-D-Termination-Letter [Litigation / Franchise dispute, Bricks & Minifigs (260200029, arbitration/termination)]	utah_rico_260402353
560	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 ↗	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document BAM FDD 2026 [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	utah_rico_260402353
561	FDD: Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks & Minifigs 2023 FDD ↗	FDD, Franchise Disclosure Document Bricks & Minifigs 2023 FDD [Franchise (FDD) / Bricks & Minifigs / BAM Franchise Disclosure Document]	utah_rico_260402353
562	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-judgment-housecl	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-judgment-housecl [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
563	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-notice-entry-of	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-notice-entry-of [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
564	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-notice-entry-of	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-notice-entry-of [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
565	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-judgment-housecl	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-judgment-housecl [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
566	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-notice-entry-of	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-notice-entry-of [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
567	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-notice-entry-of	Judgment Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-notice-entry-of [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
568	Motion Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Motion-to-Stay-Compel-Mediation-Arbitration	Motion Bricks-and-Minifigs-Case-260200029-Motion-To-Stay-Compel-Mediation-Arbitration [Litigation / Franchise dispute, Bricks & Minifigs (260200029, arbitration/termination)]	utah_rico_260402353
569	Motion for Default Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-motion	Motion For Default Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-motion [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
570	Motion for Default Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-motion	Motion For Default Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-motion [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
571	Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (UPL) Order	Ohio Bar V. Legally Mine (UPL) Order [Litigation / UPL discipline, Ohio Bar v. Legally Mine (2025-0037)]	utah_rico_260402353
572	Order Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-order-denial-170474	Order Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-order-denial-170474 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
573	Order Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-order-denial-170485	Order Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-order-denial-170485 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
574	Order Reckless-Ben-Provo-Misdemeanor-Case-261000376-Pretrial-Protective-Order ↗	Order Reckless-Ben-Provo-Misdemeanor-Case-261000376-Pretrial-Protective-Order [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
575	Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-claim-amended-cca	Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC26531-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-claim-amended-cca [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
576	Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-letter-168333371	Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-letter-168333371 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
577	Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-proof-service-prs	Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-proof-service-prs [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
578	Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-LLC-proof-service-prs	Oregon-Small-Claims-25SC30722-benjamin-schneider-v-l2-bricks-llc-proof-service-prs [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. L2 Bricks (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
579	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-claim-cc-1726577 ↗	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-claim-cc-1726577 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
580	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-consent-cn-17621	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-consent-cn-17621 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
581	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-mediation-no-agr	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-mediation-no-agr [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
582	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-1	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-1 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
583	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-1	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-1 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
584	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-1	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-1 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
585	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-1	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-1 [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
586	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
587	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
588	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
589	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
590	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
591	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
592	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-notice-hearing-m [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
593	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-small-claim-resp	Oregon-Small-Claims-26SC06134-benjamin-schneider-v-joshua-johnson-small-claim-resp [Litigation / Small claims, Schneider v. Johnson (OR)]	utah_rico_260402353
594	Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Advisement-of-Rights ↗	Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Advisement-of-Rights [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
595	Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Information-and-Indictment ↗	Reckless-Ben-Utah-Case-261000376-Information-and-Indictment [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
596	Statement American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Probable-Cause-Statement ↗ PII	Statement American-Fork-Police-26AF02033-Probable-Cause-Statement [Litigation / Criminal, UT State v. Schneider (261000376) + American Fork PD]	utah_rico_260402353
597	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Detail ↗	Utah UCC, BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
598	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Detail	Utah UCC, BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
599	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Name History	Utah UCC, BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
600	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Name History	Utah UCC, BAM Franchising Business 11984597 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
603	Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail	Utah UCC, BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
604	Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail	Utah UCC, BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
605	Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Name History	Utah UCC, BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
606	Utah UCC: BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Name History	Utah UCC, BAM IP Holdings Business 14333873 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
609	Utah UCC: Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Detail	Utah UCC, Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
610	Utah UCC: Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Detail	Utah UCC, Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
611	Utah UCC: Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Name History	Utah UCC, Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
612	Utah UCC: Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Name History	Utah UCC, Big Blue Bungalow Business 10331756 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
615	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 12343181 Detail	Utah UCC, DDL Investments Business 12343181 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
616	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 12343181 Detail	Utah UCC, DDL Investments Business 12343181 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
617	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 12343181 Name History	Utah UCC, DDL Investments Business 12343181 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
618	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 12343181 Name History	Utah UCC, DDL Investments Business 12343181 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
619	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 9234745 Detail	Utah UCC, DDL Investments Business 9234745 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
620	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 9234745 Detail	Utah UCC, DDL Investments Business 9234745 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
621	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 9234745 Name History	Utah UCC, DDL Investments Business 9234745 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
622	Utah UCC: DDL Investments Business 9234745 Name History	Utah UCC, DDL Investments Business 9234745 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
625	Utah UCC: Legal Bear Business 8097970 Detail	Utah UCC, Legal Bear Business 8097970 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
626	Utah UCC: Legal Bear Business 8097970 Detail	Utah UCC, Legal Bear Business 8097970 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
627	Utah UCC: Legal Bear Business 8097970 Name History	Utah UCC, Legal Bear Business 8097970 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
628	Utah UCC: Legal Bear Business 8097970 Name History	Utah UCC, Legal Bear Business 8097970 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
631	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14261919 Detail	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Business 14261919 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
632	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14261919 Detail	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Business 14261919 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
633	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14261919 Name History	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Business 14261919 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
634	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14261919 Name History	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Business 14261919 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
635	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
636	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Business 14441858 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
637	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Name History	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Business 14441858 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
638	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Business 14441858 Name History	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Business 14441858 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
641	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 11521063 Detail	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Business 11521063 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
642	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 11521063 Detail	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Business 11521063 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
643	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 11521063 Name History	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Business 11521063 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
644	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 11521063 Name History	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Business 11521063 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
645	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 14441864 Detail	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Business 14441864 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
646	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 14441864 Detail	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Business 14441864 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
647	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 14441864 Name History	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Business 14441864 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
648	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Tax and Accounting Business 14441864 Name History	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Tax And Accounting Business 14441864 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
651	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10165814 Detail	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 10165814 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
652	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10165814 Detail	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 10165814 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
653	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10165814 Name History	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 10165814 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
654	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10165814 Name History	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 10165814 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
655	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10694354 Detail	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 10694354 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
656	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10694354 Detail	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 10694354 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
657	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10694354 Name History	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 10694354 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
658	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 10694354 Name History	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 10694354 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
659	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 11676318 Detail	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 11676318 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
660	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 11676318 Detail	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 11676318 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
661	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 11676318 Name History	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 11676318 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
662	Utah UCC: LMRA Services Business 11676318 Name History	Utah UCC, LMRA Services Business 11676318 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
665	Utah UCC: Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Detail	Utah UCC, Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
666	Utah UCC: Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Detail	Utah UCC, Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
667	Utah UCC: Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Name History	Utah UCC, Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
668	Utah UCC: Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Name History	Utah UCC, Medisource Marketing Business 9224895 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
671	Utah UCC: Procure Business 10875462 Detail	Utah UCC, Procure Business 10875462 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
672	Utah UCC: Procure Business 10875462 Detail	Utah UCC, Procure Business 10875462 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
673	Utah UCC: Procure Business 10875462 Name History	Utah UCC, Procure Business 10875462 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
674	Utah UCC: Procure Business 10875462 Name History	Utah UCC, Procure Business 10875462 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
677	Utah UCC: Shield Business 4916731 Detail	Utah UCC, Shield Business 4916731 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
678	Utah UCC: Shield Business 4916731 Detail	Utah UCC, Shield Business 4916731 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
679	Utah UCC: Shield Business 4916731 Name History	Utah UCC, Shield Business 4916731 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
680	Utah UCC: Shield Business 4916731 Name History	Utah UCC, Shield Business 4916731 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
681	Utah UCC: Shield Business 7763582 Detail	Utah UCC, Shield Business 7763582 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
682	Utah UCC: Shield Business 7763582 Detail	Utah UCC, Shield Business 7763582 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
683	Utah UCC: Shield Business 7763582 Name History	Utah UCC, Shield Business 7763582 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
684	Utah UCC: Shield Business 7763582 Name History	Utah UCC, Shield Business 7763582 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
687	Utah UCC: Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Detail	Utah UCC, Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
688	Utah UCC: Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Detail	Utah UCC, Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
689	Utah UCC: Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Name History	Utah UCC, Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
690	Utah UCC: Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Name History	Utah UCC, Team Dentistry Business 13558625 Name History [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
697	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Detail Secondary Copy	Utah UCC, BAM Franchising Detail Secondary Copy [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
698	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Detail Secondary Copy	Utah UCC, BAM Franchising Detail Secondary Copy [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
699	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising INC Summary 2026-06-02	Utah UCC, BAM Franchising Inc Summary 2026-06-02 [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
700	Utah UCC: BAM Franchising Summary Secondary Copy	Utah UCC, BAM Franchising Summary Secondary Copy [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
702	Utah UCC: Legally Mine Detail Secondary Copy	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Detail Secondary Copy [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
703	Utah UCC: Legally Mine LLC Summary 2026-06-02	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Llc Summary 2026-06-02 [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
704	Utah UCC: Legally Mine LLC Summary 2026-06-02	Utah UCC, Legally Mine Llc Summary 2026-06-02 [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
706	Utah UCC: Utah-UCC-legally-mine-detail	Utah UCC, Utah-ucc-legally-mine-detail [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
707	Utah UCC: Utah-UCC-legally-mine-summary	Utah UCC, Utah-ucc-legally-mine-summary [UCC filing / Utah SOS UCC lien / financing statement]	utah_sos_ucc
902	Delaware Certificate of Merger: BAM Franchising (Oregon) into Delaware (File No. 2482543)	Delaware Certificate of Merger (DGCL 252): Oregon BAM Franchising Inc. merged into a same-named Delaware corporation (survivor); signed Ammon McNeff President; effective 12/18/2023 for accounting only; filed 4/18/2024; SR 20241516656; File 2482543 [Delaware entity / certificate of merger]	delaware_corp
903	Criminal - American Fork Probable Cause Affidavit - Stalking + Targeted Residential Picketing (261401094)	American Fork PD probable-cause affidavit (case 261401094; arrest 3/10/2026): charges STALKING (76-5-106.5) + TARGETED RESIDENTIAL PICKETING (76-9-109); State's narrative of repeated residential appearances after a trespass, photographing the home, a yard sign with the resident's face, and an impersonation/postal-worker signature ruse; notes Provo + Sandy referrals [Criminal / probable-cause affidavit]	criminal
904	Civil 260402353 - Intervenors (Law-Gorman-BAMF Salem) Motion to Dissolve TRO	Proposed intervenors (Chrystal Law, Benjamin Gorman, BAMF Salem 1 LLC) Rule 65A(b)(4) motion to modify/dissolve the June 2 2026 TRO: unconstitutional prior restraint (Near; NYT v US; KUTV v Conder), overbroad (Tory v Cochran), binds non-parties never served (Regal Knitwear; Alemite; Zenith; Taylor v Sturgell), Rule 65A non-compliant, UPEPA rights reserved; expressly takes NO position on relief vs defendants alleged to have engaged in true threats, doxxing, trespass, or impersonation [Civil filing / anti-SLAPP / prior restraint]	civil_filing
905	Civil 260402353 Exhibit K - Threat Screenshots (messages BAM and the McNeff family received)	Exhibit K to BAM's verified complaint (260402353): compiled messages BAM and the McNeff family received after the videos went viral - pseudonymous emails/DMs/comments including arson and 'explosive Lego sets' threats, a death threat naming the CEO, wishes of cancer on the family, racist abuse, and violent online comments. Offered by BAM as its harassment/threat evidence; senders overwhelmingly pseudonymous, attribution to Schneider contested (BAM's 'Schneider Group' RICO theory) [Civil filing / complaint exhibit / threats]	civil_filing

The recordSources & the records archive

The complete source-records archive, all 639 redacted primary documents behind the citations, is public: open the archive on Proton Drive ↗. Every file is named by the same DOC NNN number cited throughout the piece, so any chip is one search away.

How the citations work: a DOC NNN chip cites a held record in the archive above; an authority box opens the case or statute on a free public source (CourtListener / Cornell / Utah Legislature / Google Scholar); and a source ↗ link opens a live public record, court dockets (Utah XChange, Oregon eCourt, NYSCEF, CourtListener/RECAP), the Utah business & UCC registries, FINRA, the FTC and state franchise portals. Built from official court dockets; state business, UCC and franchise registries (Utah, Oregon, Alaska, Delaware, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Washington, California); franchise disclosure documents 2012→2026; USPTO/TTAB; SBA PPP data; the Ohio Supreme Court; FINRA and FTC records; and the public bodycam and media record.